[SeaBiscuit]

No, the rudybots were trashing legitimate conservative candidates.

[de meanr]

Thanks. I stand corrected. Like I said, I didn’t follow it that closely.

Any Ron Paul Supporters here? You know how one drop of Fred!’s blood sprayed into the atmosphere would stop global warming? Well, Ron Paul killed a rabbit with his teeth. It was a Peeps Bunny, though. Does that count?

[Principled]

I think, and it's only a think, is that being pro someone (Rudy in this case) isn't going to be a problem but being vitriolic and slamming other candidates with unsubstantiated crap IS going to be a problem.

Makes perfect sense that a conservative site would want to eliminate liberal debate "tactics". There is a preference for facts and logic over hysteria and attacks - no surprise.

I'm glad a line was drawn. I've been absolutely laser beamed by this kind of stuff for years when discussing another topic - it just kept getting worser and worser. Now it ain't so bad - can actually discuss. Thanks JR.

[calcowgirl]

No, the rudybots were trashing legitimate conservative candidates.

And continuously lying about history and Reagan, just to make Rudy look better
(despite being proved wrong, over and over and over).