Excellent column.
TY for posting it.
LOL....gee, what many have been saying for awhile on FR. I can't wait for Michael now to be labeled a RINO, traitor and POS....
BOOKMARKED
Michael Reagan is correct.
Dutch should come back from the dead and slap the hell out of his idiot son.
One word---Newt.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Ronald Reagan had one litmus test he applied to candidates. Were they Republicans? If they were he backed them all the way. He would let the party choose the candidate and he would support and vote for the candidate. He didn’t go sniffing around trying to find some flaw in their character or their past.
That's right. It's the voters decision to make. This is just another attempt to force a decision not made by the voters down our throats.
It's outrageous that many will not support Rudy because of just one single particular issue---
WHEN THERE ARE JUST SO DARN MANY OTHER ISSUES TO JUSTIFY OPPOSING HIM!
About Giuliani: "but because he backs abortion and some form of gun control"
Some form of gun control? How about complete gun control, except for his fellow elitist cronies, coupled with an unprecedented assault on the 2nd Amendment via legal decimation of lawful businesses.
So many republicans are so convinced that if their values aren't represented, they are going to stay home or vote 3rd party. If people are going to be "1 issue" voters, for crying out loud, let that issue be "THE WAR AGAINST TERRORISM IN AMERICA". I believe that my values are not changeable - I believe in Pro-Life, the 2nd amendment, against embryonic stem cell research (but for adult cells like ambilical cord research), etc. I also believe that we have put the gov't in charge of these values and they need to be local and people oriented. We talk about reduced government control and yet complain about a candidate that won't do this or that about a gov't controlled agenda to wipe out something we're against. Let's stick to the basics and get together on someone who will lead us against terrorism, crime and taxes on the US citizens.
Another Rudy shill? Good thing his show is heard by about 9 people.
Here's a brilliant idea. Let's let the media decide who we should vote for. Obviously the media's vast integrity stands for something.
Clearly they only want an honest government regardless of party. They only want a good clean race and are promoting the best candidates.
(yeah, it's what you think it is)
Yes, it is. As Reagan the elder liked to say, don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Very good piece.
I guess Michael forgot his dad ran against a sitting Republican president.
Excuse me Michael for wanting all the dirty laundry revealed BEFORE the nomination is given. All we need is for Hillary's secret police dropping a scandal bomb the week before the election and the Republicans not having the MSM on their side to offer a response.
Mike, Mike, Mike...
Where have you been? Stand up for your dad. The Rats are died-in-the-wool LIBERALS. First, foremost, and ALWAYS. They have "An America is Always Wrong" Foreign Policy Litmus test. They tried to drum Lieberman out of their party.
And they also manifestly DO have an explicit social litmus test on abortion. They are for "the right of the women (note not mother) to choose" infanticide in all but name.
How many truly Pro-Life candidates are there amongst the Rats who waffled and postured on the issue? How many Rats would openly declare themselves against the abomination of Roe v. Wade?
None that I recall.