Well, that's pretty handy, isn't it? The evolutionary scientists who publish the journals refuse to publish the work of young earth creationist scientists, then say their work is not valid because it isn't published in scientific journals.
Circular reasoning, anyone?
Science that is published must meet a standard for recognized methodology. Apparently their work doesn't meet this standard.
Actually, scientific journals set actual rules, and for research and science that is necessary. Case in point, just yelling "its in the bible" doesn't cut it. You gotta collect some physical evidence, make some acutal data, propose actual hypotheses.
There is a reason for that, it seperates the junk from the science, sorry that it doesn't fit with your beliefs, but are your beliefs so thin that they can't stand some discovery?