Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: conniew

Actually, scientific journals set actual rules, and for research and science that is necessary. Case in point, just yelling "its in the bible" doesn't cut it. You gotta collect some physical evidence, make some acutal data, propose actual hypotheses.

There is a reason for that, it seperates the junk from the science, sorry that it doesn't fit with your beliefs, but are your beliefs so thin that they can't stand some discovery?


147 posted on 01/14/2007 10:10:21 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (Never Let a Theocon Near a Textbook. Teach evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: Central Scrutiniser

no no- it doesn't go against our beliefs- infact- science just strengthens our belief-- you aren't going to state that creation science is junk now are you? Because they use the very same science that you call real science and come up with very real evidences based on scientific facts-

Stand some discovery? Where? Discovery? Like the couple of truckloads of fossil bones and fragments that supposedly rtepresent millions of species evolution despite the fact that NO transitional species were ever found? NONE? Nadda? Zip? Zilch? Feathered dinos? Nope- sorry- not even close to being feathers- BUT- your 'peer review' magazines touted them to be feathers- that is until they were looked into by those who didn't just take hteir word for it and used scientific fact to prove they weren't feathers. Eukoroytes being transitional species? Nope- Sure- it was taught in schools (probably still is) UNTIL it was exposed that Eukoryotes were nothign but a symbiotic species living off their host- but you wouldn't know that unless you dug deep into the facts- Heck- the National Geographic still ists crap like this as their evidence- and indoctrinate our kids with junk science like that even though most scientists have dropped it because the facts were exposed

Cambrian explosion- many many species all came on the scene all at once fully formed- no transitional species- clams then are the same clams today as well as all the other species.

Ready to hit some biology? It's a biological impossibility for species to evolve- there are built in protection levels that prevent it- in order for evolution to happen you also NEED to have gene transference- without it, you'll never ever have evolution- mutations do NOT produce the necessary NEW informatiuon needed for one species to become a different one-


154 posted on 01/14/2007 10:23:32 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson