Posted on 01/03/2007 11:04:31 AM PST by newgeezer
I've provided the links, while all he has done is repeatedly lie. And you should know by now it's not going to stop.
LMAO, so says the guy who has been busted for lying for months. For what purpose? His defense of foreign hackers who were ripping Apple's OSX. And he's been lying ever since.
Perfect proof of his ridiculous lie, he was frantically trying anything he could come up with to glorify Russian hackers, and the best he could do was claim an American was a Russian hacker then continue lying about it for months.
ROFL, you already tried to claim I had lied on this thread, when all it has turned out to be is more lies from you and your normal endless defense of radical leftists and hackers.
Me not hearing of someone does not mean they are not famous in hacker or security circles.
I know, but that is his excuse for his lie, that we should have known. Perfecty demonstrates how ridiculous not only his original lie was, but his supposed excuse for making it in the first place.
Someone who is a security expert should have know the orgin of the most used tools..
Go back to the original thread, he didn't even identify "nmap", he went way out on a limb claiming a Russian Hacker created some tool used the DoD, the obvious purpose so he could defend the Russian hackers in that thread, when in fact it was an American. He's too low for words to describe, a Russian hacker loving sellout is a start.
You claimed you "exposed" my test. First lie. I told you in that Clinton thread you linked to.
You claimed my continuation of the test was in defense of Russian hackers. Second lie.
You claimed my excuse for the test was then in defense of "Green Party leftist Richard Stalllman." Third lie.
You said that I was trying to make excuses for Russian hackers. Wow, partially true in that I do not believe copyright should be able to extend into abuses of established law. However, I did successfully defeat your unsupported claim that they were criminal using actual law, and you then used personal attacks to avoid admitting you were wrong. And you repeated that unsupported claim in this thread. Fourth lie.
Also in your quotes of what I posted, you eliminated the context, especially eliminated the exclamation marks that show I was being sarcastic. Mischaracterization of another FReeper's post = fifth lie.
I can't believe I actually once defended you having a philosophical approach to purchases.
I keep waiting for masses to switch to Apple so they stop picking on Windows OS. I never understood those that use Mac and have a good thing saying "come on over here". I'd rather swim with fewer peeing in the pool but have to use Microsoft for specialized business software requirements requiring security devices.
Everyone else - Go Apple!
LMAO! YET ANOTHER LIE! This guy is unbelievable in how he refuses to quit lying, all in the defense of leftists and foreign hackers.
I linked it because you claimed he was Russian, here is your exact quote, when you came to the defense of you leftist buddy FLAMING DEATH who was stuck trying to claim a Russian wrote Multics, antoher ridiculous lie from you Russian hacker loving sellouts:
Nmap is included in the distro, and we all know that was written by a Russian hacker.
That is YOUR quote. That was the first time it was mentioned in that thread. And you were still claiming he was Russian, just like you had in other threads, for months.
Second lie of yours, not mine. In your last post! You were there on the Clinton thread defending FLAMING DEATH's claim a Russian wrote Multics, which of course is a lie as well, I just linked the thread again above so you can quit lying now. I think that guy is actually an American citizen too, you pathetic traitors is dispicable, if you're even Americans to begin with.
These slimeballs talk in so many circles they even mix me up.
Gold Eagle Out.
I call BS on that. I do project management but I don't know who was the pioneer in that field. Does that mean I don't know project management or can't be considered an expert?
I also do a lot of programming I know what/who Ada is but does that make me an expert programmer? although I don't know who created fortran.
You claimed my continuation of the test was in defense of Russian hackers. Second lie.
You claimed my excuse for the test was then in defense of "Green Party leftist Richard Stalllman." Third lie.
See the problem with you admitting to lying is we don't know when you're lying or telling the truth. You never should have lied for months on end to try to score a point because now no one (except your closest brethren) can believe you.
Do you know the top, most famous, currently used project management tools? Nmap is the network security equivalent.
As I told GE when giving him hints to solve my test (yes, I did help him, gave him the tools to find the truth), the author's name, "Fyodor," is so popular it actually shows #1 in Google, ahead of the famous Russian author Fyodor Dostoyevsky. Do you know what it takes to get to #1 in unpaid Google ahead of such a famous name? A Google for "network scanner" also has nmap on the third site hit, #2 if you're looking for a free one, #1 if you're looking for an open source one.
Here are some basic facts you can confirm with anyone in the field:
The military (which GE supposedly works for) DEFINITELY knows nmap. It's in the information assurance literature that all people in GE's supposed position should read (some of it is required reading for everyone in such a position). But is AR lying? Do you think I may be lying? Does the government really know about nmap? A picture is worth a thousand words:
Lt. Gen. Keith B. Alexander, director of the National Security Agency, and William Marshall, another NSA official, give President Bush a tour of the super-secret agency's headquarters in Fort Meade, Md. Photo Credit: By Evan Vucci -- Associated Press
You can even use nmap as a plug-in to the #1 tool on that list, Nessus, although the Nessus plug-in architecture makes that undesirable. Now Nessus suggests you run nmap and pump the results into Nessus. Of course, I can back that claim up.
Trivia: Nmap even had a scene in Matrix Reloaded, being properly used (a rarity in Hollywood computer depictions) to take advantage of an actual known SSH vulnerability.
Now you have proper context of the issue.
You: LMAO! YET ANOTHER LIE!
Proof. Your response was to blow it off.
Don't claim you knew, because in a later post you say "Now you're claiming he's American, who knows,". You did not know whether to believe he was American or Russian, which means you did not know.
Basic logical concept here: If you did not know he was American, you could not have caught me on it.
Also notice your purposeful attempt at distortion by taking things out of context. I'll go slowly so you can't weasel:
You quote me: "Nmap is included in the distro, and we all know that was written by a Russian hacker"
You say "That was the first time it was mentioned in that thread. And you were still claiming he was Russian."
Timeline:
I revealed my test at post #113.
I revealed that he was American in post #120.
rzeznikj at stout also revealed he was American in post #130.
Your quote above from me was at #229.
The timeline shows two lies from you:
I'm still trying to understand how Ubuntu can have Russian influences just because the guy who funds the project rode a Russian rocket to get to his vacation on the International Space Station. The Tin Thrush needs to realize that Ubuntu's founder is just a very rich businessman and venture capitalist -- Ubuntu is his way of philanthropy (as opposed to giving money to Planned Parenthood).Remember, stated AFTER I informed you he was American. The dripping, blatantly obvious sarcasm was because of your ridiculous statement that equates to one having Norwegian "ties" if one takes a cruise to the Bahamas.Oh wait, I know how it has Russian influences! Nmap is included in the distro, and we all know that was written by a Russian hacker.
for-q-clinton, you now see what we deal with. Don't believe me, merely look up the cited posts. I hotlinked them for your convenience. What you see that makes you believe GE is in the right only appears so in the out-of-context settings that GE tries to create.
Once again knowing a tool and knowing who wrote the tools are two COMPLETELY DIFFERENT concepts. One is practical for security experts the other is trivia for Trivial Pursuit IT edition.
Don't forget that he also presents himself as a hacker expert. He showed no indication of knowing about either the tool or its author despite his claims of working in a position that pretty much requires that he know about at least the tool.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.