Skip to comments.
Bush: happy for Cheney's gay daughter pregnancy
Reuters ^
| 12/15/06
Posted on 12/16/2006 11:22:33 AM PST by Blackirish
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Vice President Dick Cheney's pregnant lesbian daughter Mary will make a "fine mom," President George W. Bush said, sidestepping his past comment that a child ideally would be raised by a mother and father.
Mary Cheney, 37, and her longtime partner, Heather Poe, are expecting their first child, which would be the sixth grandchild for the vice president. Cheney was hired last year as an executive for America Online.
"I think Mary is going to be a loving soul to her child. And I'm happy for her," Bush said in an interview with People magazine.
TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: barfalert; busybodies; familyvalues; fantasy; fatherlesschild; fertilty; fetish; homosexual; liberalism; liberals; makingnice; moralabsolutes; moralrelativism; perverts; purists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580 ... 801-807 next last
To: little jeremiah
Real love is based on truth. If I love someone, and I am mandated, as are all souls, by God to love all His creatures, then I am also mandated by that love to do good to them. God is Love. Love is truth. Love is eternal, unchangeable and invulnerable. Love is truth. Love is the first.
Love is kind. Love is forgiving. Love is charitable. Love is patient. Love is caring. Love is respectful. Love is giving. Love is delighting in the presence of etc.
Though I do agree that love would stop a child from running off a cliff. Love would not then proceed to beat that child. I do not see your posts on this site as loving. Not at all. The parent who saved a child from running off a cliff would then hold that child and express their love for them.
We should tell ourselves the truth - be brutally honest with ourselves - but we should be tactfully honest with others. In other words - those who want to hurt others and say *but I'm just telling the ""truth"" * are fooling no one. They are doing exactly what they want to do - they are consciously harming one of God's creations.
541
posted on
12/17/2006 3:01:32 PM PST
by
Sunsong
To: Central Scrutiniser
evangelicals have intruded into our classrooms You're right. Evangelical parents have no business trying to influence their children's education.
All their kids are belong to us.
542
posted on
12/17/2006 3:05:28 PM PST
by
Gelato
To: 1rudeboy
A crime the English language against?
543
posted on
12/17/2006 3:16:48 PM PST
by
bvw
To: Sunsong
Mathematics is the supreme commandment. "Go forth and Integrate."
544
posted on
12/17/2006 3:19:54 PM PST
by
bvw
To: bvw
545
posted on
12/17/2006 3:38:26 PM PST
by
Sunsong
To: PetroniusMaximus
But, you brought up sodomy.
LOL
(nice dodge)
546
posted on
12/17/2006 3:43:43 PM PST
by
Central Scrutiniser
(Pro Evolution, Pro Stem Cell Research, Pro Science, Pro Free Thought, and Conservative)
To: little jeremiah
Is it OK under your proposed theocratic state if a woman's husban dies, and she is inseminated with his sperm (she technically would be single at that point)
You are quite the absurdist aren't you?
You are a scary little control freak though, wanting to dicatate who can and who can't reproduce.
As for my "utopia", well, it would be none of my business, so it wouldn't affect me.
547
posted on
12/17/2006 3:47:21 PM PST
by
Central Scrutiniser
(Pro Evolution, Pro Stem Cell Research, Pro Science, Pro Free Thought, and Conservative)
To: bvw
Never use a preposition to end a sentence with. :)
To: PetroniusMaximus; little jeremiah; The Ghost of FReepers Past; EternalVigilance
"The Islamic Penal Law Against Homosexuals, approved in July 1991 and ratified in November of that year, is simple. Article 110: Punishment for sodomy is killing; the Sharia judge decides on how to carry out the killing. Article 129: Punishment for lesbianism is one hundred (100) lashes for each party. Article 131: If the act of lesbianism is repeated three times and punishment is enforced each time, the death sentence will be issued the fourth time."My question to you guys is real simple...
What's in the best interest of our nation, to move away from this, or to move toward it?
549
posted on
12/17/2006 4:23:02 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
To: 1rudeboy; Sunsong; Central Scrutiniser
Please review my previous post.
550
posted on
12/17/2006 4:24:55 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
NAMBLA wants to make it legal for adults to have sex with children.
My question to you guys is real simple...
What's in the best interest of our nation, to move away from this, or to move toward it?
551
posted on
12/17/2006 4:55:38 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Circumstances are the fire by which the mettle of men is tried.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
"The Islamic Penal Law Against Homosexuals, approved in July 1991 and ratified in November of that year, is simple. Article 110: Punishment for sodomy is killing; the Sharia judge decides on how to carry out the killing. Article 129: Punishment for lesbianism is one hundred (100) lashes for each party. Article 131: If the act of lesbianism is repeated three times and punishment is enforced each time, the death sentence will be issued the fourth time." Wow! Thanks for finding that. For those who want to retreat to the past - this must be the kind of thinking they are endorsing!
552
posted on
12/17/2006 5:01:09 PM PST
by
Sunsong
To: EternalVigilance
That has nothing to do witn this question, we're not discussing adults raping children, now, be "man" enough to answer my question.
553
posted on
12/17/2006 5:04:27 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
To: EternalVigilance
Hey, the extremist has arrived! So what is hard to understand about children and sex? Children are not capable of giving consent. Sex with children is illegal and should remain so - same with animals. Just as beating children or animals should remain illegal - or deliberately neglecting their care if you are their legal guardian.
Now, answer the question - do you want to move toward or away from Sharia law in regard to homosexuals?
554
posted on
12/17/2006 5:05:45 PM PST
by
Sunsong
To: Luis Gonzalez
"The priesthood have, in all ancient nations, nearly monopolized learning. And ever since the Reformation, when or where has existed a Protestant or dissenting sect who would tolerate A FREE INQUIRY?
The blackest billingsgate, the most ungentlemanly insolence, the most yahooish brutality, is patiently endured, countenanced, propagated, and applauded. But touch a solemn truth in collision with a dogma of a sect, though capable of the clearest proof, and you will find you have disturbed a nest, and the hornets will swarm about your eyes and hand, and fly into your face and eyes."
John Adams in a letter letter to John Taylor
555
posted on
12/17/2006 5:15:41 PM PST
by
KDD
To: Sunsong
Hey, the extremist has arrived! So what is hard to understand about children and sex? Children are not capable of giving consent. Sex with children is illegal and should remain so - same with animals. Just as beating children or animals should remain illegal - or deliberately neglecting their care if you are their legal guardian. That's a pretty long list of moral judgments you're making there, you theocrat you. s/
At least we're finding the limits of your immorality.
556
posted on
12/17/2006 5:19:33 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Circumstances are the fire by which the mettle of men is tried.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
I answered your question a long time ago on this thread.
Keep your homosexual friends out of the public square, away from my kids, and stop trying to normalize the abnormal, and you won't have any problem with me. You'll be free to continue to put your stamp of approval on acts that are destroying the souls and bodies of men and women who were created for something much higher.
557
posted on
12/17/2006 5:22:22 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Circumstances are the fire by which the mettle of men is tried.)
To: EternalVigilance
I've long said that I support the most freedom possible as long as what one is doing is not consciously harming others. If you think about it - you'll see that it is wise advice. You are free to do as you will - as long as you do not harm others...or as Jefferson put it - as long your exercise of freedom does not interfere with someone else's exercise of their freedom.
It's not rocket science.
558
posted on
12/17/2006 5:30:31 PM PST
by
Sunsong
To: Sunsong
Well, your definition has a nice modern ring to it, even if it bears little resemblance to the definition of liberty used by the founders of this country.
559
posted on
12/17/2006 5:37:25 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Circumstances are the fire by which the mettle of men is tried.)
To: EternalVigilance
I'm a believer in using dictionary definitions:
liberty
The right and power to act, believe, or express oneself in a manner of one's own choosing.
Like I say - it is NOT rocket science.
560
posted on
12/17/2006 5:44:05 PM PST
by
Sunsong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580 ... 801-807 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson