Fossils Point to Oldest Life on Earth 
To: areafiftyone
I clicked here just for the specific purpose of posting a Helen Thomas pic...
2 posted on
06/07/2006 1:36:31 PM PDT by
RockinRight
(She rocks my world, and I rock her world.)
To: areafiftyone
....odd-shaped, rock-like mounds 
4 posted on
06/07/2006 1:38:43 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(Liberals ignore criminal behavior, reward sloth and revere incompetence...........)
To: areafiftyone
more BS from the Church of Liberalism.
To: areafiftyone
According to Fenton and Fenton [1989 edition) "The Fossil Book", by the time of the book, stromatolites were generally accepted as fossils of algae; living stromatolites could be found in Australia.
Not sure where the news is on this... they seem a little behind the times.
13 posted on
06/07/2006 1:43:00 PM PDT by
mcashman
To: areafiftyone
She's undead; not technically old "life."
Eats unbaptised babies, I understand.
20 posted on
06/07/2006 1:50:34 PM PDT by
MeanWestTexan
(Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
To: areafiftyone
28 posted on
06/07/2006 2:05:04 PM PDT by
2nsdammit
(By definition it's hard to get suicide bombers with experience.)
To: areafiftyone
3.4 million eh?
Well, the Bible clearly says that plants came from the earth, and plants were formed a long time before the dinosaurs (oops, birds) and fish were created, so I guess this is just another case of science finally getting around to agreeing with Genesis.
29 posted on
06/07/2006 2:07:08 PM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: areafiftyone
Darwinism is so absurd, they are now bringing L. Ron Hubbard and alien beings into the theory.
To: areafiftyone
Thank you for at least not posting not posting an oversize picture of "The Fossil".
37 posted on
06/07/2006 2:19:20 PM PDT by
Boiler Plate
(Mom always said why be difficult, when with just a little more effort you can be impossible.)
To: areafiftyone
We can match up old Helen with Murtha. That would make an even ugly moment...one for the left eye and one for the other left eye. Since this species thrives well and lives long then Darwin got it all wrong.
41 posted on
06/07/2006 2:22:28 PM PDT by
tflabo
(Take authority that's ours)
To: areafiftyone
If they died 3.4 billion years ago, why are they calling it the oldest LIFE on Earth?
46 posted on
06/07/2006 2:38:14 PM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: areafiftyone
Stromatolites.
These look like pics of the ones offshore India.
57 posted on
06/07/2006 2:51:37 PM PDT by
djf
(Bedtime story: Once upon a time, they snuck on the boat and threw the tea over. In a land far away..)
To: areafiftyone
59 posted on
06/07/2006 2:52:35 PM PDT by
airborne
(Satan's greatest trick was convincing people he doesn't exist.)
To: areafiftyone
"These are too complicated to be attributed to non-biological processes - but we don't know that for a fact." That is not "science". Everybody knows you can't differentiate "design".
126 posted on
06/07/2006 6:57:40 PM PDT by
AndrewC
To: SunkenCiv
131 posted on
06/07/2006 7:07:44 PM PDT by
annie laurie
(All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost)
To: areafiftyone
"One of the clinchers was categorizing them into seven repeating subtypes, which indicates they weren't
random. Odd, the use of that word - patterns and randomness may be at once the beginning and the sum of what we know?
393 posted on
06/08/2006 6:29:38 PM PDT by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: areafiftyone
566 posted on
06/17/2006 3:00:18 PM PDT by
sully777
(wWBBD: What would Brian Boitano do?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
