"And whether or not the former is and advance and the latter a reversal is a subjective human abstract construct."
Yeah, sometimes extinction is just the best thing for a species, right?
Yeah, sometimes extinction is just the best thing for a species, right?
What's *best* for a species and what is not is a subjective human abstract construct. Environmentalists often wish humans beings to change their behavior in a way that is not beneficial to humans in order to prevent extinction of a species. In such cases, do you think they are right or wrong?
It appears so...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=just+needs+killin&btnG=Google+Search
If it's not a reversal, is it more like a, "nevermind, I don't need that after all" kind of change?