This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 04/29/2006 1:50:06 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Enough noise from this damn thing. |
Posted on 04/27/2006 8:01:57 AM PDT by Tribune7
Im happy to report that I was in constant correspondence with Ann regarding her chapters on Darwinism indeed, I take all responsibility for any errors in those chapters. :-)
(Excerpt) Read more at uncommondescent.com ...
Do you believe what the Bible says about those two questions?
"Probably. This pretender tells them that the evidence of their senses and the conclusions of their reason are illusions. This pretender convinces some to reject reason for irrationality, science for mysticism. Fact for fantasy."
Oh then you have NOT read what the pretender will be preaching. Something like PEACE, PEACE, PEACE, come into my light, or under my loving shade, like the riddle/allegory written of the talking trees in Judges 9. Interesting of just what trees are named in Genesis and Christ Himself told us to learn the parable of the 'fig' tree and then cursed that 'fig' tree.
"I thought they wrote Rush Limbaugh's theme song."
Need a little plotted diversion did you????
"Oh then you have NOT read what the pretender will be preaching."
Hey, he's fooled you. Don't blame me for that. :)
Darwin himself was a Whig, and was influenced by Adam Smith and Malthus. He basically shared the prejudices of an upper-class Brit of the day, except that he was much less racist.
His theory was accepted by practically all biologists by 1880, long before the left had any influence on academia.
So back up your claim.
In post 178 (a response to post 135), you posted that it was a possibility that God inspired Moses to write Genesis (BTW, we know that all Scripture is inspired...not just that it is a possibility)...But that you didn't know how inspiration ocurred (visions, whispers?).
My post of II Peter 1:20-21 was to show that, via Scripture, we do know how:
"...men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit."
I am not sure what your post was about or how it related to the topic of the mechanics of inspiration.
I've come to the conclusion that Ann Coulter is the Andy Kaufman of conservatism; you never know if she's serious, or tongue in cheek, but you do know she is trying to grab attention in the slyest manner possible. At least Rush has always been upfront about being primarily a performer ("demonstrating absurdity by being absurd"); I'm never quite sure about Coulter.
"not of woman born" is from Macbeth, but McDuff is a good guy.
Is there *anyone* in Scripture (except Adam and Eve) who isn't woman-born?
"Hey, he's fooled you. Don't blame me for that. :)"
Time will tell about that.
Well, most people think that both passages refer to both a real person who is now dead and Satan. I haven't heard of anyone saying they refer to the Antichrist. Also they don't say anything about birth at all.
Lay on, Macduff.
"Well, most people think that both passages refer to both a real person who is now dead and Satan. I haven't heard of anyone saying they refer to the Antichrist. Also they don't say anything about birth at all."
When Christ Himself says that the whole world, all but the "elect" will be deceived and go after the instead of Christ then what most people think and claim is brought into question by Christ Himself.
That's not the goal of the theory of evolution, it's just your opinion, which is rejected by many. Even if it were true that your premise follows from the theory of evolution, it would merely be a unintended consequence. The purpose of the theory of evolution is to explain the evidence, and it does that quite well.
Calm down. It's all predestined, anyway.
Ms. Coulter started out as a serious legal commentator during the Cl*nt*n scandals and impeachment. But it appears that she's now following the path of least reisistance and turning into a caricature. Sad.
I don't see Jesus quoted anywhere in the NT as saying "In Isaiah and Ezekiel here I'm talking about the Antichrist."
Now where is your Scriptural basis for saying the Antichrist is not born of a woman?
"Calm down. It's all predestined, anyway."
NO it is NOT all predestined, were that to be the case there would have been no point to this flesh age!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.