Posted on 03/27/2006 9:53:41 AM PST by Pukin Dog
Just a little dose of reality for some of you going nuts over the Immigration issue, because there is NO chance that you will win on the border enforcement issue. No chance whatsoever. Only after a migrant worker program passes, making most of these illegal aliens legal, is there any chance at all to have meaningful border enforcement.
Bush is not running for office anymore, but the Republican Congress is in need of a big victory in November. This issue will kill our chances to maintain the majority, and knowing that, Bush will likely veto any bill making illegal immigration a felony, if that bill does not include the migrant worker program (call it amnesty if you want) needed to hold onto Business and Hispanic support for the Republican Party.
The Illegal Immigration Genie is out of the bottle, folks. You cant stuff her back in without losing the House and/or Senate in November. Pragmatic minds will rule in the end, and that is a bitter pill you best swallow now.
FReepers cant will elections for the Republican Party, but we sure can go a long way towards losing them, if we cant put our common sense ahead of our passions on this issue. I live in San Diego County, and I see the problems with illegal immigration on a daily basis.
Whether you like it or not, much of the commerce of this country does depend on these folks to do jobs that Americans wont do for the prevailing wage.
So, you have a choice, you can demand the border enforcement bills on their own, or you can swallow hard and consider everything you will lose if we turn off 10-15% of the electorate, in addition to the business community that depends on these workers. Yeah, they broke the law, and so do the people who hire them.
So what?
Yeah, I said it, SO WHAT? The time to be worried about that was when there were REAL Republican majorities in the Border States. It is too late now. This is a problem that cannot be solved, but only managed.
It is possible to be right and stupid at the same time. Pete Wilson tried this a few years ago, got all kinds of support for it. It passed, and Pete Wilson is gone. Then a judge overturned it anyway. That is exactly what you can expect to happen with these current bills as well. Some judge will put an injunction on enforcement, but by the time that happens, we will be knee-deep into impeachment proceeding under a Democrat Congress.
Bush wont let that happen, neither will smarter members of the Senate and House. You wont win, you cant win, but you can shoot yourself and the Republican party in the head (even if you are not a member) by pursuing a program that does not include amnesty or whatever you want to call it.
We lost this one.
Get over it. There are bigger battles ahead.
Puke, it's amazing how wrong you can be.
This is not the first time round this particular issue for us grownups. We did it most recently in the Reagan Administration.
Once a guest worker program or amnesty is set up, why poof say the politicians, there is no illegal alien problem anymore, so why spend money on border security. Thus we start round the circle again. That is why we know better than to accept this 'solution' again.
On the other hand, once the borders are secured then almost everyone can accept almost any solution to the problem of the current illegal aliens, because with the border sealed it's a one time thing. And once illegal immigration is stopped, and the status of illegals now here regularized, the extent of the true need for guest workers will become evident and a program to supply and control them can be knocked to gether in weeks.
SO9
Horse-hockey! The CRIMINALS who employ ILLEGAL aliens do so to gain competitive advantage over those who abide by the laws of our country, not out of any threat that they will go under if they follow the rules.
"how do you propose getting rid of 20 million people????"
Crack down on their CRIMINAL bosses and cut off social services. They will seof-deport in no time flat.
Just make 'em miserable and they'll self deport - no services, no medication, no welfare, no congregatin for day labor, etc.
No, what I'm OK with is a "level playing field" where Gov't decreases demands on what an employer must offer workers.
Then we send in the miltary. They are not Americans.
I think your headline is dead wrong. He may 'win' but I think he's split the Republican Party irreparably. Many of us no longer believe Republicans represent the interests of legal American citizens -- or the law. Pragmatism has its limits and I've reached mine. It no longer matters which political party runs things, they're both taking the rightful citizens this country to ruin. I think the professional political class has pissed America away. There are no longer any useful political alternatives that I can see.
We cut bankruptcies for millions of Americans so certainly we should be able to cut welfare for illegals,.
"I just want folks to consider the consequences. If they think that the losses incurred by an all-out fight to take back the country are justified, so be it.
I just wanted to inject that little bit in there. If war is what we want, well, let's do it and get it over with.
Going into a battle in which the LOSS OF YOUR LIFE is a possibility needs careful consideration."
What are we? Americans or Frenchies? Lots of my family's blood has been spilled the last 150+ years, and I'll be damned if it was all for naught.
So we're supposed to be held hostage by criminal elements?
I think not. Better to have LA burn now than the rest of the country later.
Thanks. I realize there's no way to haul 11M illegals out of here. And the fence could take years. There has to be a way to catalog them. INS needs major revamping, the sooner the better!
Okay. You sounded like others here who have admitted to doing so. I understand what regulation and minimum wage laws can do to a business. What I don't understand is why a successful business person who does not break the law by hiring illegal aliens advocates this for others. I know I don't understand business very well. But you're talking about violating the law and making it sound acceptable and okee-dokey.
Oh, gee, please let me know when I can have my own opinion.
Free Republic has been around a decade or less, while I've been able to form my own opinions and insights for several decades.
I said "other exorbitant regulation"....health care is an exorbitant cost, for example.
Are you saying that Government demands on what employers must provide is not egrarious? A decrease in Gov't regulation is of optimal benefit.
When you incrase regulation, things go bad. That's what's going on here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.