Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: DC Ripper

Everyone needs to calm down. This company outbid everyone else on this deal. Security will not change one iota whether it's the old British owned company or this one. The Dubai company has a huge economic stake in keeping things kosher ie 6.2 billion dollar investment. The more I know about this the more comfortable I feel that there is nothing to be concerned about.

I would however suggest that Bush allow a 45 day review period so all the "bedwetters" can get up to speed.


82 posted on 02/21/2006 12:41:38 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: traderrob6

So everyone is concerned is a "bedwetter?"

Get lost.


126 posted on 02/21/2006 12:45:21 PM PST by DC Ripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: traderrob6
The Dubai company has a huge economic stake in keeping things kosher ie 6.2 billion dollar investment.

Some may think it offensive to include "Dubai" and "kosher" in the same sentence.

150 posted on 02/21/2006 12:48:04 PM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: traderrob6
I agree that there's probably nothing to be concerned about with this deal. This is a change of ownership of a company that operates ports. It's not a land purchase and it's not a change in the personnel of the operating company. The same security procedures have to be followed for any foreign-owned company, whether it's owned by Britain, Singapore, Mexico, or the UAE.

Interestingly, the UAE and Oman are right on the south side of the strait of Hormuz, through which flows a sizeable percentage of the world's oil supplies. Iran sits on the north side of the strait. This is not the time to be annoying the UAE or Oman because we may need to fight Iran across the strait at some point in time. This acquisition might actually be an attempt by the UAE to strengthen their friendship with the US, but so far that isn't happening...to say the least.

246 posted on 02/21/2006 12:56:05 PM PST by defenderSD (¤¤ If ecoterrorists attack my SUV, I'll taser them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: traderrob6
The more I know about this the more comfortable I feel that there is nothing to be concerned about.

I'm not completely comfortable with it, but I'm starting to understand that we need to keep certain governments, like Dubai, engaged so we don't lose them altogether. I think they're the only government that we've had a security agreement with since the 1940s, and it'd be good if we can keep somebody over there at least nominally speaking to us.

Besides, it gives us something to seize in case the fewmet hits the windmill.

250 posted on 02/21/2006 12:56:13 PM PST by SlowBoat407 (The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: traderrob6
"Security will not change one iota whether it's the old British owned company or this one"

Well, thanks for saying that, but can you guarantee it? Maybe you don't think it matters that the country of Dubai will now be working directly with the U.S. Coast Guard regarding national port security plans and procedures. Not exactly great information for an Arab muslim nation to have.

The UAE company will also be directly responsible for hiring security personnel and dock workers. I suppose you can guarantee they won't slip a few terrorist spies into some sensitive positions? Time to wake up and smell the coffee.

539 posted on 02/21/2006 1:25:35 PM PST by TheCrusader ("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: traderrob6
Everyone needs to calm down. This company outbid everyone else on this deal. Security will not change one iota whether it's the old British owned company or this one. The Dubai company has a huge economic stake in keeping things kosher ie 6.2 billion dollar investment. The more I know about this the more comfortable I feel that there is nothing to be concerned about.

At this point, I have two concerns:

1) Can we be absolutely certain that our security has not been reduced as a result of this deal. For example, if the port management company were to gain knowledge of specific counter-terrorism methods, and if this knowledge were to be passed over the our emnemies, who might use such knowledge to circumvent out protections, so as to bring some bad stuff in via these ports?

2) This is certainly a political disaster for Bush and the Republicans, which is why the Republican congress critters are running away like scalded dogs, and will likely turn on bush in the interest of their own preservation. I see only downside for the Republicans in giving the Dims and the sycophant MSM a hammer with which to beat them senseless. Why put the party in greater risk of losing seats in November?

1,409 posted on 02/21/2006 4:27:02 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie, because he didn't bake one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson