Would you please point to the post where I implied that someone had lied?
Please review your own statement to which I initially responded...
Yet, I defy you to find a single Evo post that contains either a purposeful logical fallacy or flat out lie.
emphasis mine...
Did you intentionally neglect or ignore a specific part of your statement? If so, that would be a purposeful logical fallacy wouldn't it?
OK lets dispatch the easy stuff first. A logical fallacy is a form of a lie. So therefore you can prove either. Becauise I abbreviated my follow-up means you have won nothing.
As a debate judge how would you score a participant who suddenly bailed on half of their argument after a single rebuttal?
There is no bailout. More importantly, your response pointed out neither a lie nor a logical fallacy.
You met neither part of my challenge. Had you pointed out a logical fallacy you MIGHT have won a small victory on my accidental truncation. But you didn't even meet the lower burden.
Your silly shenanigans with words, although amusing, have no forensic weight, much less logical weight.
My challenge stands -- have you no champion?