Starting with your first example, I have to agree that the poster is a delusional megalomaniac.
That was not a logical lapse. The poster to which he replied specifically said that calling the poster a liar was equivalent to calling God a liar. Hell, even I (of limited intellect) caught that.
NMH claims never to have heard of Anthony Flew, yet here he is posting about him.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1298548/reply?c=160
Let's try again.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1298548/posts?page=160#160
Poster #1 says when you insult him, you insult God. Dimensio properly infers that QED Poster #1 thinks he is God. Where is the lie?
Highlighted by thread master #1 here
The AM tells Dimensio to knock off the name calling. I see "arrogant and delusional" which are probably what ticked off the (very thin skinned that session) AM. No acknowledgement of any lying.
Acknowledged here
A post (a classy one at that) indicating that Dimensio didn't realize the first post was a quote and apologizing for reacting to the post as if it were the poster's own words. Not a lie, just an apology for misunderstanding.
And reinforced by thread master #2 here
The SB admonishes PatrickHenry, DaveLoneRanger, Dimensio, nmh (and implicitly everyone) for calling people liars (one must assume whether or not it is true). He also admonishes for hitting "Abuse." Nothing that says Dimensio (or anyone) is lying.
Not a single lie in your referenced posts.
I guess the AM doesn't like us to point out preveracation, but I will leave it that purposely posting a series of posts like these as an "example of Evo lying" is either a sign of a massive reading comprehension problem or purposeful reinterpretation. It is also a great example of what passes for "proof" by CRIDers.