Posted on 12/30/2005 7:04:29 PM PST by SwinneySwitch
See post 105, 115, 116.
JoJo and I seem to be getting along better.
Shameless plug, see my post 87 and read the vanity in it.
It doesn't look like it deals with sexual promiscuity, but it does...
Cheers!
I make no secret of my techno-dunce status. Not proud of it, but everyone can't know everything.
Now, why would I do that? The Mods are watching this thread, they already put out a warning for civility. They obviously don't care that all you offer is insults to a lot of good people.
Congratulations, you have degenerated this discussion into the usual emotional ravings. You accomplished what you set out to do.
It's all yours.
It is a screen name, hardly worth arguing about.
Dashwood was an English knight and Lord Despenser, Lord-Lieutenant of Buckinghamshire, elected member of The Royal Society, elected as Member of Parliament for Weymouth & Melcombe Regis, elected as Member of Parliament for New Romney, appointed Colonel of the Bucks Militia, appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer, Postmaster-General, and great friend of Ben Franklin, the American Deputy Postmaster-General.
Franklin wrote:
"I am in this house as much at my ease as if it was my own, and the gardens are a paradise. But a pleasanter thing is the kind countenance, the facetious and very intelligent conversation of Mine Host, who, having been for many years engaged in public affairs, seen all parts of Europe, and kept the best company in the world, is himself the best existing."
Dashwood also went to bat for Americans and tried to negotiate a favorable agreement for the colonies in Parliament.
I would just kill all the perps.
Allow me to set you straight once again. Thank you.
It was a "what if". I don't know anything about the poster and his/her family members, therefore how could I possibly aim anything directly towards a child? And even if I'd had, only someone like yourself wouldn't have seen it was in favor, not against. Nope, you just had to open your mouth and show yourself a fool.
According you you, we can't express ourselves by examples, by saying "let's imagine". I can only bow and genuflect to such an intellectual Krakatoa.
See ya around, Brainiac.
You want to play let's imagine games, use the term 'a' child. Don't you EVER make it personal by referencing a message board poster's child on a rape and porn thread.
AND you did it in an arguement with the FREEPER. I see that not only as foul; but as a threat.
Did Dr Sardonicus really dream 12 different times?
I really wasn't going to respond to you anymore, but this is too good to pass up.
As has been said so many times, what I said was in defense of the child. Now you're saying it was some kind of "threat"?
I'm honestly not saying this to belittle you, but your seeing what I said as a "threat" can mean only that you have severe mental issues.
Don't look for me to respond to you anymore, not at least until you seek professional help.
Stick up my behind, eh?
But that's okay. Some here are hypocrites, the social churchies who want to be seen, yet not walk the walk. When it comes to defending kids against the Fakers, I'll not apologize.
Perhaps someday your daughter will come up pregnant and fighting the tide of the Fakers who will ostracize her yet never contribute one thin dime to a nourishing meal or a diaper. But you'll know that JoJo Gunn won't look down his nose at her.
As I've already alluded elsewhere, Jesus came because of our imperfection, and I'll call on the carpet the Fakers who try and brainwash our kids into impossible ideals. Kids can and will screw up, and anyway, a perfect Utopia is an ideal, ultimately of stagnation, spouted by the Left. Like it or not, we're here to struggle and be tested, and we either encourage each other after the damage has been done, or hinder them in order to feel superior.
Comic Book Guy, is that you?
Post that again and you will be suspended.
You give me one damn good reason why.
You're Calpernia.
that the victims are mostly very young girls often very poor and young poor boys is a blot on any God-fearing human being...
what I believe is as long as we have men ( and women) who feel they NEED and DESERVE and have a RIGHT too unchecked pornagraphy, and prostitution and unGodly music and movies and magazines etc....then the abuse of young children and youngish girls and boys will continue....
this has nothing at all to do with Hooters, but you find grown men, supposedly Christian, who defend this silly but sad degradation of young women as acceptable and this folks, this cavalier attitude towards degradation is where it all starts.....
I wish. Unfortunately I am me, and have to pull my chit together for yet another year.
Right now it sux to be me, or what is left of what me wuz.
and it is snowing out.
raccoons live better than me on days like this.
I agree.
Caught your post after responding to something else, but truer words are rarely spoken.
Grown men treat every woman as they treat their mothers or daughters, with deference and ultimate respect.
The rest of us are mere horny boys who need a slap to remind them of the reality.
Jim, I thank you. Just your restoring my post speaks volumes to me.
And I hope the others don't see that as favoritism. On the contrary, I feel that.... well, I don't know how to exactly put it. Let's just say that before coming here this morning I'd expected to be canned, and I would have lost respect for a place that's billed as pro Life and pro Family, etc. I now find that I have even more respect for this site, just for being allowed to put up the Good Fight.
Happy New Year to all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.