Skip to comments.
Intelligent Design case decided - Dover, Pennsylvania, School Board loses [Fox News Alert]
Fox News
| 12/20/05
Posted on 12/20/2005 7:54:38 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
Fox News alert a few minutes ago says the Dover School Board lost their bid to have Intelligent Design introduced into high school biology classes. The federal judge ruled that their case was based on the premise that Darwin's Theory of Evolution was incompatible with religion, and that this premise is false.
TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: biology; creation; crevolist; dover; education; evolution; intelligentdesign; keywordpolice; ruling; scienceeducation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,100, 1,101-1,120, 1,121-1,140 ... 3,381-3,391 next last
To: Bushbacker1
The Darwin THEORY and the Intelligent Design THEORY! And the Yakub THEORY and the Xemu THEORY
1,101
posted on
12/20/2005 2:37:26 PM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
(so natural to mankind is intolerance in whatever they really care about - J S Mill)
To: xzins
The intelligent designer can be a phenomenon or a process or a sentient being. It simply requires a +factor that can take products of lesser complexity and build them into products of exponential complexity in the available time. Oh. I get it. ID is evolution, since it can, and does, accumulate information and complexity over the time since the earth accreted.
1,102
posted on
12/20/2005 2:37:36 PM PST
by
narby
(Hillary! The Wicked Witch of the Left)
To: laxin4him
So if archeologists discovered many of the sites, names and history that was written in the bible would that just make it a coincidence?
Eh? Mythology often contains elements of historical truth. You're setting up a rather bizarre false dichotomy.
To: Dimensio
"You were asked to support your claim that evolution is not science"
Can you prove I do not exist?
1,104
posted on
12/20/2005 2:37:49 PM PST
by
Baraonda
(Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
To: eleni121
Stalin loved it and implemented Darwin's ideology into his plans... so did hitler. Marx thought the world of Darwin. Before blaming the woes of the world on evolutionists it might pay to remember that the Pharisees, who handed over Christ for execution, were creationists and Biblical literalists. Funny that you fail to mention that side of the coin.
1,105
posted on
12/20/2005 2:38:35 PM PST
by
Quark2005
(Divination is NOT science.)
To: Baraonda
Can you prove I do not exist?
Non-sequitur. You have no rational arguments, you only lie.
1,106
posted on
12/20/2005 2:39:45 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: eleni121
Darwin was in fact a misanthrope. Duplicitous and opportunistic...like his heirs here. If I could spell ad hominem, then I'd say that that's all you've got.
1,107
posted on
12/20/2005 2:39:46 PM PST
by
narby
(Hillary! The Wicked Witch of the Left)
To: thomaswest
You are a ringer, arent you?
1,108
posted on
12/20/2005 2:40:10 PM PST
by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: aNYCguy
Mythology often contains elements of historical truth. You're setting up a rather bizarre false dichotomy.
Nonsense. And the discovery of the city of Troy proves that Zeus exists.
1,109
posted on
12/20/2005 2:40:11 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Quark2005
I fail to see the relation, and needless to say, I believe such a usage to be insulting.
1,110
posted on
12/20/2005 2:40:21 PM PST
by
benjibrowder
(The government (at all levels) should not be involved in the education business.)
To: memetic
But they all appeal to the super natural . . . Exactly how does organized matter, intelligence, and design, "appeal to the supernatural?" Granted, many religions posit God as Creator and Sustainer of the universe. That only means intelligent design happens to be compatible with a religious understanding, and yes, that compatibily easily extends to a specifically Christian point of view. So what?
To: js1138
They aren't lying. They're just testifying inconsistently.
Is that legalese for "misspeaking"?
1,112
posted on
12/20/2005 2:40:59 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Stark_GOP
"Godwin Law."
I certainly wasn't the one bringing up Hitler, Stalin, and Marx.
1,113
posted on
12/20/2005 2:41:49 PM PST
by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
To: Recovering_Democrat
Aren't the people of Dover, PA smart enough to figure this issue out?? Huh, yeah. That's why the entire Dover school board that did this idiotic ID thing was defeated in the last election.
1,114
posted on
12/20/2005 2:41:50 PM PST
by
narby
(Hillary! The Wicked Witch of the Left)
To: Dimensio
I've never seen anyone on the evolution side ever tell a creationist to do their own research without at least providing a starting point for the research. You didn't even offer that much. Well at least you've revised your claim to incorporate some of my corrections. Nevertheless, your assertion once again is flat out false. Go back and look at the posts. I know you think things will become true just be re-repeating them, but they will not. If I was a rabid FR evolutionist, I'd accuse you of lying.
Interesting that you claim exactly this sort of behaviour about us. Kind of reminds of Clinton's tactic of taking whatever scandalous tactic he was using and pre-emptively accusing the Republicans of doing this. I'm sure it's just a coincidence though...
To: benjibrowder
I believe such a usage to be insulting.Curious. Why exactly?
1,116
posted on
12/20/2005 2:42:28 PM PST
by
Thatcherite
(More abrasive blackguard than SeaLion or ModernMan)
To: narby
It exists in the several thousand Endogenous Retro Virus DNA sequences that co-exist in genomes of these various species. ERV viruses insert their DNA into host DNA in random places, and on very rare events, that viral DNA is passed down to descendents. When we find such sequences in more than one species, it is proof that a single individual got a virus millions of years ago, and passed it to both species via evolution. Not to mention that in most cases the ERV data perfectly mirrored the phylogenetic trees established from other lines of evidence before ERV analysis was even possible.
To: Dimensio
Or as my mom would say, 'Fudging the truth'...there are all kinds of little euphemisms for lying...
To: benjibrowder
Trust me, get back on the Thorazine!
1,119
posted on
12/20/2005 2:43:18 PM PST
by
MindBender26
(Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry......)
To: jennyp; connectthedots
Oh my. I hadn't noticed until now that
connectthedots was missing out on this, the very thread he has been waiting for!
connectthedots, I sincerely enjoy your discussions and hope you do make an appearance.
1,120
posted on
12/20/2005 2:43:19 PM PST
by
Antonello
(Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,100, 1,101-1,120, 1,121-1,140 ... 3,381-3,391 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson