Yeah, so? That in no way affects my point, or ameliorates Hovind's dishonesty (and loon-ness) apparent in the portions of the court document I posted. And I fail to see how my "decency" has anything to do with your non sequiter either. I didn't "have the decency" to post Hovind's shoe size or favorite cereal, either, and those are equally irrelevant to my post.
Try to focus and stay on topic, okay?
Hey Babe, I am on topic. You presented some cut and past and acted like it was a fact that Kent has been found guilty of some crime by saying his cars were seized.
GUESS WHAT!
They gave the cars back. And whether you like it or not, it's part of the story.
So stop with the kiddie cut and paste and find out what really happened down there.