Hey Babe, I am on topic. You presented some cut and past and acted like it was a fact that Kent has been found guilty of some crime by saying his cars were seized.
GUESS WHAT!
They gave the cars back. And whether you like it or not, it's part of the story.
So stop with the kiddie cut and paste and find out what really happened down there.
?
I am on topic.
Not the topic I was on, no, you're not.
You presented some cut and past and acted like it was a fact that Kent has been found guilty of some crime by saying his cars were seized.
Wrong. My point had nothing at all to do with whether Hovind was guilty of a crime or not. Try to read for content next time.
GUESS WHAT!
I guess you're confused, that's what I guess.
They gave the cars back.
Whoop-de-do. It doesn't affect my point at all.
And whether you like it or not, it's part of the story.
I couldn't care less, frankly.
So stop with the kiddie cut and paste and find out what really happened down there.
Okay, I'll bite -- what makes *you* qualified to know "what really happened down there"?