Replies

Ah, I see - so the real fallacy you've spotted here is the "posting on subjects not approved by darbymcgill" fallacy. Hmmm, that one must have been omitted from my rhetoric texts.

And as I see it, the logic police on these threads are doing too much profiling. They like to point out the logical flaws at their CREVO opponents but are strangely silent when the ping listers fire out some whoppers themselves.

It only took 6 posts before Hovind was called names and only 10 before he was debunked because of his tax returns and then some ping lister had the nerve to taunt the CREVO's numerous straw men.

I find these inconsistencies humorous.

It only took 6 posts before Hovind was called names and only 10 before he was debunked because of his tax returns...

As I said, when Hovind stops labeling anyone who disagrees with him a liar, perhaps I'll take complaints about name-calling more seriously. As for the second part, post ten never "debunked" him because of his tax returns - in fact, it doesn't really mention his theories on evolution at all. If you insist on reading things that aren't there, I don't think anyone's going to be able to help you.