It only took 6 posts before Hovind was called names and only 10 before he was debunked because of his tax returns... As I said, when Hovind stops labeling anyone who disagrees with him a liar, perhaps I'll take complaints about name-calling more seriously. As for the second part, post ten never "debunked" him because of his tax returns - in fact, it doesn't really mention his theories on evolution at all. If you insist on reading things that aren't there, I don't think anyone's going to be able to help you.
Then you'll be able to explain why those who post references to know scientific frauds within the TOE are ridiculed for posting straw men?
Those frauds are recognized facts, why are they not as legitimate and the tax return posts?
Do you only take seriously flaws in logic that undermine your world view?