[Senator Bedfellow]

When the thrust of his argument is to accuse those with whom he disagrees of out-and-out lying, he's pretty well abandoned the moral high ground as far as personal attacks go. Hovind is a fraud and a tax cheat, and that is just about the only response he deserves.

[darbymcgill]

Hovind is a fraud and a tax cheat, and that is just about the only response he deserves.

Can we agree then that since some of the premises of the original TOE have been debunked and/or "revised" we can discount Darwin and "any" other statements in his TOE as fraudulent.

Would you also agree that any scientist that has..... let's say been divorced or smoked weed is a liar and a law breaker and we can discount their scientific arguments as fraudulent and lies?