[darbymcgill]

Hovind is a fraud and a tax cheat, and that is just about the only response he deserves.

Can we agree then that since some of the premises of the original TOE have been debunked and/or "revised" we can discount Darwin and "any" other statements in his TOE as fraudulent.

Would you also agree that any scientist that has..... let's say been divorced or smoked weed is a liar and a law breaker and we can discount their scientific arguments as fraudulent and lies?

[Senator Bedfellow]

I'm sure you'll point me to the post where I say that, because Hovind cheats on his taxes, his opinions on evolution should be summarily dismissed. Otherwise, this looks more to me like you seeing something that isn't there. He is, in fact, a fraud and a tax cheat, but anything you infer from those facts is your handiwork, not mine.

[shuckmaster]

some of the premises of the original TOE have been debunked

Gimmie one example please. Just one is all I ask!