No; but, that will be your take on it nonetheless. It can't be about defending the truth against absurdities or anything like that. It must be that I have an agenda behind my attempt to make you guys look dumb. You've had to crawl down from your collective perches to admit that you don't know something. Being stung, now you have to lash out. Must be terrible for you.
We have established you are utterly ignorant here or you might have anticipated an objection or two. So when do you shut up?
When it comes to origins, I'm happy to say we have established that we are both ignorant. Ignorance, as it happens is not a crime. It just means we don't know. You seem to take offense at that. I do not. So when do you shut up?
That's precisely what it is about, thanks. Science has a real evidence picture. If it isn't the final word, it nevertheless paints a clear picture of how the diversity of life on Earth arose. Not the first life, but the diversification ever since.
A lot of people are saying a lot of false things about what evidence science has and what that evidence indicates. Hint: it isn't me.
And I don't shut up because I'm the one correcting the "misstatements" as the Dover trial has come to characterize them.