That's precisely what it is about, thanks. Science has a real evidence picture. If it isn't the final word, it nevertheless paints a clear picture of how the diversity of life on Earth arose. Not the first life, but the diversification ever since.
A lot of people are saying a lot of false things about what evidence science has and what that evidence indicates. Hint: it isn't me.
And I don't shut up because I'm the one correcting the "misstatements" as the Dover trial has come to characterize them.
No, sorry. Like a painting, the painting is what you see. What it means is merely a matter of interpretation foisted upon the painting. You're mistaking your projections as happenstance. As I've stated time and again, you aren't comfortable with saying, "I don't know" when you don't know.
You'd rather project and pontificate that projection. That isn't science. That is opinion/fiction.