[Ichneumon]

[What's pathetic is someone who gets his jollies this way.]

If you only knew my dear... Stick around you'll find out.... If you can "endure" it...

ROFL!!! On several other posts, you have bizarrely taken "evos" to task for presuming anything about poster's mental state or intent or motivation at the time a post was written, snidely asking us if we're "clairvoyant".

Now here, you have no problem whatsoever with swallowing eleni121's presumption, reading into a post someone "getting their jollies", and you not only don't take eleni121 to task for it, you heartily concur (clairvoyant yourself, eh?)

Nice double standard you've got there -- creationists like eleni121 can presume a poster's mental state and that's fine by you (and *you* can do it frequently and proudly without shame), but when an "evo" does it you suddenly consider it to be the height of inexcusable presumption.

Do you not realize what a hypocritical buffoon this makes you?

Admit it, you're just trolling, right? No one could be this insanely hypocritical for real...

[darbymcgill]

Can you think of any other complementary descriptive terms?

On several other posts, you have bizarrely taken "evos" to task for presuming anything about poster's mental state or intent or motivation at the time a post was written, snidely asking us if we're "clairvoyant".

Several? Us? We're?..

Now who's the troll.... ?

If you had been reading the thread instead of researching my challenge you would know that my response is really quite funny.... Have you read them all yet?

Keep pedaling, you'll catch up... but don't go too fast, you're starting to make the same mistakes you despise so much only in your opponents.

this really is fun... we're all lucky you're still here for us to "endure the new stuff"....

[Right Wing Professor]

They're both on my VI list, anyway. Fanatics should at least be amusing, and neither of them is. But I couldn't resist eleni121's idiotic 'correction' of someone else's misspelling with her own.