We haven't had a Kent Hovind thread in a long time.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
2 posted on
12/17/2005 3:59:39 AM PST by
PatrickHenry
(... endless horde of misguided Luddites ...)
To: PatrickHenry
I hope that's an observation, not a reason.
4 posted on
12/17/2005 4:02:38 AM PST by
Oztrich Boy
(so natural to mankind is intolerance in whatever they really care about - J S Mill)
To: PatrickHenry
Is he the same guy who came on the Ali G show?
7 posted on
12/17/2005 4:33:08 AM PST by
CarrotAndStick
(The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
To: PatrickHenry
11 posted on
12/17/2005 5:03:22 AM PST by
tutstar
(Baptist Ping List Freepmail me if you want on or off this ping list.)
To: PatrickHenry
It is all about fleecing the flock.
Note that I didn't include the links for the above in the public interest.
12 posted on
12/17/2005 5:08:52 AM PST by
peyton randolph
(Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
To: PatrickHenry
In a nutshell, debates like this do not settle issues of scientific understanding, he said. Hovind and his arguments are not even in the same galaxy as legitimate scientific discourse. This is why the faculty here has universally decided not to engage Hovind. The result would be to give the appearance of a controversy where none exists. He added, The faculty on campus is under no obligation to waste its time supporting Hovinds little charade.
Exactly and perfectly stated.
13 posted on
12/17/2005 5:11:37 AM PST by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
To: PatrickHenry
Better dumb and right, than clever and wrong.
18 posted on
12/17/2005 5:33:10 AM PST by
JasonC
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past; ohioWfan; Tribune7; Tolkien; GrandEagle; Right in Wisconsin; Dataman; ..
No professor wanted to defend his side, he said. I mean, we had seats reserved for their people
cause I know one objection could have been Oh, its just a bunch of Christians. So we had seats reserved for them to bring people to make sure that its somewhat more equal, not just all against one. And still nobody would do it.
Revelation 4:11Intelligent Design
See my profile for info
19 posted on
12/17/2005 5:34:41 AM PST by
wallcrawlr
(Pray for the troops [all the troops here and abroad]: Success....and nothing less!!)
To: PatrickHenry
Wow, look what the flood did in about 30 minutes.
LoL, That's where I stopped reading. That is just ignorant!
To: PatrickHenry
Did UMW pay this clown to speak at the campus?
22 posted on
12/17/2005 5:39:13 AM PST by
Ben Chad
To: PatrickHenry; tutstar; 2Jedismom; Sybeck1; pamlet; aumrl; HeadOn; mariabush; nmh; Ingtar; ...
26 posted on
12/17/2005 5:43:17 AM PST by
WKB
(If you can't dazzle them with brilliance.. then Baffle them with BS)
To: PatrickHenry
And people wonder why we are afraid of the right wing.
28 posted on
12/17/2005 5:47:42 AM PST by
MonroeDNA
(Look for the union label--on the bat crashing through your windshield!)
To: PatrickHenry
"Stupid is as Stupid does"
37 posted on
12/17/2005 6:28:01 AM PST by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" R. A. Heinlein)
To: PatrickHenry
Hovind and his arguments are not even in the same galaxy as legitimate scientific discourse. This probably a clue to the origins of a lot of the trolls who infest this forum.
38 posted on
12/17/2005 6:28:52 AM PST by
shuckmaster
(An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
To: PatrickHenry
Kent Hovind evolved physically, but not intellectually, from an ape.
92 posted on
12/17/2005 7:55:26 AM PST by
verity
(The MSM is a National disgrace.)
To: PatrickHenry
So how about one you wise-en-heimers debate him and collect the cash? Nah ya got no facts just snide remarks....jokers...lol!
To: PatrickHenry
Debating Hovind on science would be like debating Ted Bundy on the death penalty.
Still, I'd do it. I love a circus. I presume a few minutes devoted to my adversary's 'career' would be permitted?
To: PatrickHenry
122 posted on
12/17/2005 8:28:13 AM PST by
shuckmaster
(An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
To: PatrickHenry
"Kent Hovind, a former high school science teacher turned creation science evangelist, said that evolution is the "dumbest and most dangerous theory on planet Earth" at a program in the Union on Dec. 6."
I couldn't agree more. He states it politely.
I'm still waiting for my gold fish to "evolve" into a cat. How silly people are ... to believe in "evolution" and all the nonsense that goes with it.
130 posted on
12/17/2005 8:42:25 AM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God))
To: PatrickHenry
[In a nutshell, debates like this do not settle issues of scientific understanding,...]
A debate between the supporters of evolution and creationism is like a debate between the supporters of bicycles and bananas.
136 posted on
12/17/2005 8:49:03 AM PST by
spinestein
(All journalists today are paid advocates for someone's agenda.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson