Replies

“No professor wanted to defend his side,” he said. “I mean, we had seats reserved for their people … ’cause I know one objection could have been ‘Oh, it’s just a bunch of Christians.’ So we had seats reserved for them to bring people to make sure that it’s somewhat more equal, not just all against one. And still nobody would do it.”

Revelation 4:11Intelligent Design
See my profile for info

Thanks for the ping wallcawlr.

Interesting isn't it sirchtruth?

The posters here have plenty of pejorative judgments to make about him and references to you but very little to offer for TOE.

These guys are a mass of contradicitons here sirchtruth

They say this Hovind guy is a crackpot nut ball and make forest gump comparison to him, bla bla 3d grade bla bla schuck and jive bla bla.

And this is contrasted against that no one in academia or from behind a screen name will step up to the plate for what is obstesibly a very easy hours worth of work (to listen to them) and collect $250K. Very telling.

And then we hear from them this Hovind could well have some tax problems too. Well I guess I could dig around a little and find plenty of dirt in the lives of evo-cultists.

But why bother? Those kind of assaults are only effective when used from the secular humanists of the liberal left. If I brought dirt here on the personal lives of evo-cultists it would be the same as pointing out the deeds of BJ in the oval office or his deeds with the chic-oms. Its expected of and from that side.

Hey, let's count down the posts till

a;
b;
c;

goes down, see freepmail for answer and laugh at the predictability of the 'scientists' lol

Wolf

The problem with Hovind's "debates" is that he fires off rapid-fire lies one after the other. Each one would take quite some time to fully debunk, but there's no time, so Hovind "appears" to be the winner even though his entire argument is supported by falsehoods.

How do you explain that the two wooly mammoth samples dated at vastly different ages actually came from two completely different specimens when Hovind's already gone off onto a tangent about stellar formation (which the theory of evolution does not address at all -- but Hovind, liar that he is, includes it as part of the theory)?