Creation evangelist derides evolution as ‘dumbest’ theory [Kent Hovind Alert!]

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Post ^ | 17 December 2005 | Kayla Bunge

[sirchtruth]

Do you have an actual argument to present for your side,

You know my argument by now, so why continue to show you absolute ignorance of it?

Or maybe you do this just to show your arrogance?

[PatrickHenry]

500 posts in the first 12 hours, more or less. Hovind is always a great topic.

[js1138]

And I missed it.

I second the motion to debate Hovind online. The debate thread could be closed to all but Hovind and a couple of FReepers.

Results would be locked for everyone to see forever.

[Senator Bedfellow]

Oops, Ex Nihilo is Aussie - prolly where the confusion arose. Sorry about that.

[Ichneumon]

[Just because *you're* entirely ignorant of the evidence doesn't mean it isn't there.]

..And just because *you're* sadly duped into believing such cultist B.S. doesn't mean it's evidence for anything.

Do even *you* believe this stuff that spews out of your brain?

And whether do you do or not, do you *really* believe that anyone is going to mistake your bizarre rant for an adequate rebuttal to the enormous amount of hard evidence contained in the link you're trying to blow off?

What's wrong with you folks? Do you find reality that hard to take a good look at?

[darbymcgill]

I've already stated I'm not in the dancing mood tonight...

But, thanks for asking

[PatrickHenry]

I second the motion to debate Hovind online.

A tornado will assemble a 747 in a junkyard long before Hovind will agree to a written debate. He's strictly a razzle-dazzle flim-flam man.

[metmom]

National Geographic and RD? *more sigh*

[js1138]

I think we should issue the challenge every day.

FR has several million unique visitors per week.

[sirchtruth]

Absolutely no theory in science is ever proven. Why single out evolution?

Show me a fish evolving to a man right now, and I might believe your stupid ass theory...

BELIEVE is the key word there for both you and I. The only difference I state my theory as a belief, your ilk tries to state BELIEF as fact, and I don't buy it and apparently neither does the majority of people, at least honest people.

[Coyoteman]

Do you find reality that hard to take a good look at?

Here's some reality. You'll probably appreciate this fellow (other folks might not). I think he's a handsome lad!

---

Fossil: KNM-WT 15000

Site: Nariokotome, West Turkana, Kenya (1)

Discovered By: K. Kimeu, 1984 (1)

Estimated Age of Fossil: 1.6 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, faunal & radiometric data (1, 4)

Species Name: Homo ergaster (1, 7, 8), Homo erectus (3, 4, 7, 10), Homo erectus ergaster (25)

Gender: Male (based on pelvis, browridge) (1, 8, 9)

Cranial Capacity: 880 (909 as adult) cc (1)

Information: Most complete early hominid skeleton (80 bones and skull) (1, 8)

Interpretation: Hairless and dark pigmented body (based on environment, limb proportions) (7, 8, 9). Juvenile (9-12 based on 2nd molar eruption and unfused growth plates) (1, 3, 4, 7, 8). Juvenile (8 years old based on recent studies on tooth development) (27). Incapable of speech (based on narrowing of spinal canal in thoracic region) (1)

Nickname: Turkana Boy (1), Nariokotome Boy

See original source for notes:
Source: http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=38

[shuckmaster]

So, in the meantime I'll presume you were just just making stuff up in post #440 when you said "some of the premises of the original TOE have been debunked".

[ml1954]

your ilk

Based on previous readings on these threads, I'm beginning to think that 'ilk' is an insult.

[shuckmaster]

Show me a fish evolving to a man right now

You can't possibly be as dumb as you pretend or else you wouldn't be capable of typing...

[PatrickHenry]

Show me a fish evolving to a man right now, and I might believe your stupid ass theory...
510 posted on 12/17/2005 7:36:31 PM EST by sirchtruth

Now there's a true classic! It's going into the list.

[darbymcgill]

Sure, presume away...

[bobdsmith]

Show me a fish evolving to a man right now, and I might believe your stupid ass theory...

Show me an existing roman civilisation is full fling right now and I *might* just believe that such a thing ever happened.

[sirchtruth]

Sirchtruth has had the scientific meaning of the word theory explained many times.

Is it the contention of all you evolutionist that just because I've had something explained to me that mean I should just automatically belive in the cult of evolution?

I've "explain" alot of things to evolutionist too...Obviously you don't believe you're being duped by a huge lie?

[js1138]

This little gem does dempnstrate the power of Hollywood to generate negative intelligence in its customers.

[darbymcgill]

And I forgot to add that your quote editing is to be admired as much as your presuming.