Point One: evolution, abiogenesis, and the Big Bang are mutually exclusive concepts. Point 1.5: monkeys are not the same thing as apes.
Second, the planets are "aligned" because of multiple natural forces we can quantify and calculate, gravity being an important one of them.
But hey, gravity is "just a theory".
Microbial cause of infectious disease is just a theory too!!
Gravity is fact not theory. I fell out of a tree once when I was a kid, so I know..........But HOW gravity works is still theoretical, in nature. If the entire universe was empty except for two hydrogen atoms separated by 20 billion light years, they would eventually come together because of gravity.....why?...........they were lonely?...........
In what way are these concepts mutually exclusive?
Interesting side note:
A Belgian priest by the name of Georges Lemaitre was the one who came up with the idea that the universe started with an explosion (he called it his 'hypothesis of the primeval atom'). He called it a "Cosmic Egg" exploding at the moment of creation--which his critics later derided as a "Big Bang" (critics who hailed from such places as Cambridge).
So, I find it interesting that those who deride belief in God adhere to a theory proposed by a priest, and used the name for it as coined by critics of his theory...