Posted on 08/26/2005 9:35:38 AM PDT by hinterlander
On Aug. 12, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson declared a state of emergency "due to a chaotic situation involving illegal alien smuggling and illegal drug shipments" on his southern border. Three days later, Gov. Janet Napolitano followed suit in Arizona.
Reason: the crisis on the border. The ally-ally-in-free immigration policy of George Bush and Vicente Fox, beloved of corporate America, has created a hell on our southern border.
Those Southwestern states are being inundated by illegal aliens trashing ranches, killing cattle, committing crimes and eating up tax dollars. The traffic in narcotics and human beings from Mexico is a national scandal and a human rights disgrace.
What is true of New Mexico and Arizona is true of our nation, which is now home to an estimated 10 million to 15 million aliens who have broken our laws and broken into our country. It is a mark of the cowardice of our . . .
(Excerpt) Read more at humaneventsonline.com ...
Employers were have have been hit.
See the hotlinks for July, June, May and more. I didn't think I was reacting to a hostile post. Sorry if I reacted that way.
No, we'll just get the Nigerians and half a dozen other types. Sound good?
Typical Buchanan/Tancredo crowd thinking. You don't even acknowledge how much our troops are doing in Iraq to protect you and your family from terrorists.
Are you also one of the ones who is hoping for an attack by terrorists who slipped over the southern border that kills thousands of Americans just so you can use it to keep out Mexican gardeners and babysitters?
After Chertoff's recent comments I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and see what they do the next few weeks. Btw I'm under no illusions the democrats would be the slightest bit better on this issue.
That's funny. Trying to turn that around on the pro-American, pro-border security, pro-national security, pro-war on Terrorism, pro-Republican immigration reform and border security advocates.
I guess you need a little reminder, quisling:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Do you agree with this sentiment? Do you think that our troops are dying in vain? Do Buchanan and Cindy speak for you?
You mean, by using YOUR lies and distortions? Guilty as charged, sir.
Show me the statement I made that insinuated anything about any FReepers being racists. Show the exact quote. You will not find anything that I have said to that effect.
This is a good opportunity for you to demonstrate what type of character you have. Show the proof or apologize like a real man would.
(Responding to a post by SirLinksALot:
"There were 7,000 construction jobs, most of which were filled by Mexicans.")
So? If there had been 7000 construction jobs lost he would have probably said "that's good, they were held by Mexicans". What a racist!
Sorry, I don't buy the line that people oppose illegal laborers simply because they are illegal.
(Responding to post by judgeandjury:
"these illegal alien lawbreakers annoy a majority of Americans by illegally crossing over our border.")
"ANNOY?" That's what it's really all about isn't it? They "annoy" you with their hard work ethic, extended family values, Christian religious beliefs and the other things we can't mention.
...and of course, who can forget this golden oldie...?
Glad to have you back, Swampy.
ROTFL!!!!
Do you agree with the sentiment expressed by Buchanan in this article whennhe says: "Where is Bush? All wrapped up in the issue of whether women in Najaf will have the same rights in divorce and custody cases as women in Nebraska. "
Hey, give the guy a break. He went for three whole days trying to come up with a new line, and this is it. Pretty impressive, eh?
No.All of which happen to be in good shape despite the anti-illegals attempts to subvert our Constitution by twisting the meaning of the word "invasion" to mean migrant workers instead of foreign armies as the authors meant, and their attempt to subvert the Constitution by deny citizenship to all persons born in America as the Constitution clearly provides.
Then it's your position that only "migrant workers" are crossing our borders then? No one else? Also, could you provide a link to support that the founding fathers' original intent was to prevent only foreign armies from invading.
Please answer this question that I previously asked. Do you oppose the United Nations or any other world government body(such as the World Trade Organization) that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people?
Glad to see you happened to find a computer. I came home to a mess of pings and then noticed your name was tossed around again by Dane, who needs to grow the hell up.
Have a great time and don't worry, I'm not telling anyone the date of your return.
Another classic. It's going up on my tribute page ASAP!
Maybe the Buchanan/Tancredo crowd's ultimate goal is to keep out the Mexican gardeners and babysitters, replacing them with Western European laborers with blond hair and blue eyes pouring across our borders bringing their beautiful daughters.
And the best part, they all look like Anita Ekberg. Yummy!
I and my immigration reform and border security advocate friends campaigned for George W. Bush, voted for George W. Bush, and still support George W. Bush on almost every issue except for, most noteably, his support for granting amnesty to illegal aliens (despite what he wants to call it) and rewarding them with jobs, benefits, and eventual U.S. citizenship. We support the War on Terror both in Iraq and Afghanistan and anywhere else where the war should be prosecuted. You will find that Tancredo's position is consistant with mine, despite your blatant slander.
I disagree with Buchanan's article as I've disagreed with a number of his statements and articles. Despite your constant lies and distortions, Pat Buchanan has little or nothing to do with the border security and immigration reform movement. He's a non player. You attempts to associate him with Tom Tancredo and other border security and immigration reform advocates is pure nonsense.
But don't let any of that stop your continuous lying and trolling on Free Republic. That's all you quislings are good for. Dane was banned for the same crap earlier today. I hope you're next. You are a pollutant - the scum that grows on the edges of Free Republic. Your constant lies and attacks and your constant shilling for the criminal invaders and their enablers has marginalized you and your opinion beyond what you want to admit.
You mean these two?
"...and there's Uncle Joe, he's a-movin' kinda slow,
at the Junction!"
I noticed you didn't explain what you have against "Nigerians and a half dozen other types."
Here is an overview of the 2006 budget too:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1471401/posts?page=12#12
I know your game. It looks like fun. Here, let me play:
David Duke is a Republican.
David Duke is a racist KKK member.
PRND21 is also Republican.
Therefore, PRND21 is also a racist KKK member.
Gee, that was fun. Stupid and pointless, but loads of fun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.