[Southack]

"Please provide your falsification criteria for this hyphothesis so that it may at least approach something resembling theory."

A successful lab experiment in which inanimate DNA was chemically or mechanically animated would go a long way towards falsifying ID. A more reliable refutation of ID would be a successful lab experiment in which long strands of meaningful DNA programming code were self-organized (without external aid) into usable genes.

Mathematical probability, however, points to the latter option as being unlikely. The former option is being explored by an innovative experiment currently under way at los alamos (Steen Rasmussen's project).

Now, I've delivered what you've asked, so it's only fair that in your next post to me, that you reciprocate with your falsification for Evolution. Name at least two acceptable methods as I've done above for ID, and name at least one credible scientific lab experiment currently under way to falsify evolution, as I've likewise named (e.g. Steen Rasmussen) for ID.

[Dimensio]

A more reliable refutation of ID would be a successful lab experiment in which long strands of meaningful DNA programming code were self-organized (without external aid) into usable genes.

How would this falsify ID?

[Ichneumon]

Now, I've delivered what you've asked, so it's only fair that in your next post to me, that you reciprocate with your falsification for Evolution. Name at least two acceptable methods as I've done above for ID, and name at least one credible scientific lab experiment currently under way to falsify evolution,

There are dozens in the links of my recent large post. Try reading them.

[Ichneumon]

A more reliable refutation of ID would be a successful lab experiment in which long strands of meaningful DNA programming code were self-organized (without external aid) into usable genes.

Already done, although you're wrong about that being a falsification of ID.

Mathematical probability, however, points to the latter option as being unlikely.

ROFL! Okay, this should be amusing: Show us your math. Make sure that your mathematical analysis actual correctly models organic chemistry *and* evolutionary processes, or else your answer will be GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out).

Go for it.