Posted on 10/12/2004 7:25:08 AM PDT by unlearner
P&G ACTIVELY RECRUITS THOSE WHO PRACTICE HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVIOR TO BECOME EMPLOYEES
Procter & Gamble actively seeks out individuals who practice the abnormal and destructive homosexual lifestyle to come to work for the company. It is the only group P&G seeks to employ based on their behavior. P&G recruits from this group because they practice the homosexual lifestyle.
The company is currently running a promotion on the homosexual website GAYWORK.COM seeking employees whose sole distinguishing characteristic is sex with same-sex partners.
In addition, P&G is a major sponsor of Out & Equal, an organization that bills itself as one that "offers LGBT (lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and transgendered) diversity training to companies that want to delve deeper into the special workplace issues faced by LGBT employees."
What kind of diversity training are P&G employees forced to attend? Here is a note from a P&G employee recently sent to us. "I'm a P&G employee at their (city) plant. I had to go to the captive audience Diversity class. The movie on homosexuals was very offensive to Christians. It showed a man in a collar (Catholic priest?) saying 'there is nothing in the Bible which says that homosexuality is wrong.'"
Why would P&G actively recruit those who engage in homosexual sex and force employees to attend a class that presents those who oppose the homosexual lifestyle in a negative light? Because P&G is committed to promoting the homosexual agenda.
In Cincinnati, Procter & Gamble is aggressively leading the fight to repeal a law that forbids giving special rights to homosexuals. P&G has given $10,000 to the political campaign to repeal the law. Citizens to Restore Fairness, the group pushing for special rights for homosexuals, is chaired by Gary Wright, an employee of P&G given a leave of absence to head the campaign. He is also a leader of P&G's corporate homosexual group GABLE/P&G.
P&G has thrown their full corporate weight behind the campaign to give special rights to homosexuals.
While P&G puts forth their best effort and money to get the law favoring homosexuals passed, they refuse to support the Ohio Marriage Protection Amendment which defines marriage as being between one man and one woman or to make a donation to the cause.
We encourage you to take the action steps listed below. Then forward this information to others on your email list. We need your help to get the word out on this unfortunate situation.
American Family Association is asking individuals to:
(1) Boycott three products of P&G — Crest toothpaste, Tide detergent, and Pampers diapers. (Many are boycotting all their products, which we encourage. Click here for a complete list of P&G products or look on the back of the product.)
(2) Call Chairman A.G. Lafley at 513-983-1100 and politely let him know that you are participating in the boycott and will ask others to do the same.
(3) Register your support for the boycott.
(4) Please forward this to your friends and family. They will have to see it to believe it, also.
(5) Print out and distribute the boycott Crest, Tide and Pampers petition.
American Family Association
That is really beyond the pale. Have you no decency?
Who are those freepers?
I would say, anyone who cares enough about the issue to maintain an archive of articles on the matter comes dangerously close to crossing the line.
You apparently think that watching out for our most precious resource, our children, is dangerously close to crossing the line.
Our most precious resource is probably the internet, but I digress.
In any event, a molestor is a criminal, whether gay or straight. Would you feel better if your kids were molested by a member of the opposite sex?
"I couldn't care less whether people live their lives as hedonists versus as puritans, nor do I care whether people are deeply religious or atheistic. That makes me a zealot?"
If you didn't care, you wouldn't be on this thread.
I do care, and I don't pretend otherwise.
"Hatespeech laws are lame. Just punch the person in the mouth. That used to work fine."
That's a very clever response.
Homosexual acitivsts are promoting hatespeech laws this very minute, and they are on the books in Canada and other countries. So when hatespeech laws are passed here, what is your solution? Punch people in the face? That'll work.
Come on, these people are insinuating that anyone who is opposed to the homo-agenda is a closet queer. That is a classic homo-promoting talking point. I'm just being clear about it; they obfuscating the same point.
Very few countries around the world have anything equivalent to the 1st Amendment. Hate Speech laws are constitutional in most countries. No serious legal scholar in this country, from Lawrence Tribe to Judge Bork, believes that such laws would pass constitutional muster in this country.
As for punching people in the face, I meant in terms of as opposed to hatespeech laws. That is, people used to just knock out someone who said something nasty about them or their race/ethnicity/religion.
Once again, please point out where I insinuated that you were a closet homosexual? And please point out where you insinuated I was one. YOU are the one insinuating things.
"diversity training to companies that want to delve deeper into the special workplace issues faced by LGBT employees."
Proof these people are elitist nutcases. In the same paragraph they "spout" off their desire for WE are The World DIVERSITY but want the majority to treat "them as *special*".... lmao!
"I would say, anyone who cares enough about the issue to maintain an archive of articles on the matter comes dangerously close to crossing the line."
I can hardly believe you just wrote that. So anyone who is interested in the subject of the homosexual agenda and how it will affect children and therefore the future of this country is getting close to crossing some line?
You're consciously minimizing the "gay" agenda, and I wonder for what purpose.
Scripter is an honorable person who dedicates much time to the cause of promoting traditional morals for the betterment of all. If you disagree, that's certainly your right, but you never - I repeat NEVER - have attempted to argue with him, me, or any other supporter of tradtional morality on actual point of fact.
Your only recourse is innuendo, name calling, and typical leftist smear tactics.
And you are saying that anyone who is not willing to boycott P&G is a closet queer.
So what is your solution to hatespeech laws other than punching people in the mouth? IOW, when hatespeech becomes the law of the land here (which it will unless social conservatives call the shots), what is your solution? Social conservatives would then have to shut up or go to jail, like the pastor in Sweden. What's your viewpoint on that?
There are many components to protecting our children and molestation is just one component. Yet percentagewise, according to many reports, homosexuals are more likely to molest children. Are all homosexuals child molesters? Of course not, and nobody has ever said that.
Since the major factor behind homosexuality (the behavior itself) is environment, and this is further supported by the fact that thousands and thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle, it's a worthwhile goal to try and get the truth to as many as possible. Even to those who like to argue from ignorance.
What facts are there to argue? I've seen all your evidence and, at the end of the day, it just leads to the conclusion that you don't like homosexuals. That's your right, of course. However, you have not in any way proved that homosexuals are becoming more numerous or having a negative impact on this country.
I suppose we have two differing views of America. I see a country that is pretty religious, pretty moral and pretty free. You seem to see the opposite.
I have never insinuated that at all. I am merely responding to those who are slamming social conservatives and the view that the "gay" agenda is something to be taken seriously. I didn't sling the innuendo.
Others here slung innuendo several times by questioning the motives of those here who are opposed to the "gay" agenda, why they (we) are "obsessed" and so on. If you read the whole thread you will see clearly that this is so.
Both sides engage in exposition to their worldviews. But I don't see Christians who've captured the HR encampments of corporate America and forcing re-education gay sensitiving training sessions on all employees, now do I? I don't know if P&G does these, but AT&T and hundreds of other corporations engage in this.
That goes beyond exposition to the point of imposition, cause these training sessions are not optional for employees.
So, let's see if you can actually concede one point of reality minus any argument, or is everything is "spin" to you.
Then what is meant by this post?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.