Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Levin: Kobe talking plea deal for non-sex crime
Harvey Levin via Good Day Live | Self

Posted on 08/04/2004 10:56:48 AM PDT by GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY

According to Harvey Levin ("Celebrity Justice") from sources connected with both sides in Eagle, Colorado:

1) Kobe accepts a plea bargain for a non-sex crime misdemeanor such as Third-Degree assault. (misdemeanor, Kobe might get probation, wouldn't have to register as sex offender).

2) Kobe settles the civil case. Pays a financial settlement. Gives letter of apology saying, "that even though Kobe Bryant belived that he was doing nothing wrong, that she felt she had been assaulted in the hotel room, and for that he was sorry."

No plea deals struck, but parties talking about it.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: civilsuitpayoff; deal; guiltyassin; hedidit; kobe; plea; rape; sexualassault; woman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 601-606 next last
To: Chantal

Please read it thoroughly.

Begin here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1184170/posts


461 posted on 08/04/2004 4:05:00 PM PDT by onyx (JohnKerry -- the standard bearer for the unbearable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I hope I'm not driving you insane. After the trial, if you ever need a good therapist, I have one...


462 posted on 08/04/2004 4:05:34 PM PDT by Chantal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: Chantal
Lin wood is the one who has been protecting the Ramseys all these years, so I don't know how I feel about him, but this girl needs the best attorney she can get to fight the millionaire's attorney....

these attorneys are basically incestuous....you can't tell the good from the bad.....LOL

463 posted on 08/04/2004 4:05:39 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

After Kobe sex is the only way to explain all that motile sperm on her that belonged to Mr. X.


464 posted on 08/04/2004 4:06:44 PM PDT by Howlin (Saving Private Hamster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

I had been lurking for a whole year before I register on this board, so I must know a thing or two.

You know what they say.....a patient man has more power than all the angry men in the world.....


465 posted on 08/04/2004 4:11:20 PM PDT by Chantal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Ain't that the truth. It's like Mike Tyson fighting Micky Rooney. The reason the victim hired Lin Wood is because she wants protection from the people who want to kill her. These people are fanatic and scary. They are so afraid that Kobe will do jailtime that they're ready to get rid of her at any cost.


466 posted on 08/04/2004 4:25:15 PM PDT by Chantal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: cherry
I just want a trial....

There will be no criminal trial.

467 posted on 08/04/2004 4:30:12 PM PDT by sinkspur (IF we were as good as our dogs think we are, what a wonderful world it would be!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: Chantal
if you ever need a good therapist, I have one...

He needs to work harder.

468 posted on 08/04/2004 4:31:17 PM PDT by sinkspur (IF we were as good as our dogs think we are, what a wonderful world it would be!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: Chantal

I am married to a psychiatrist. :)


469 posted on 08/04/2004 4:31:50 PM PDT by onyx (JohnKerry -- the standard bearer for the unbearable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: BushisTheMan

Howdy partner.
Nice to have you here on FR.
We like to get to know our friends and neighbors.
Could you mosey on over to your profile page (under More/My Profile on the home page), and give us a word or two about yourself?
Thanks.


470 posted on 08/04/2004 4:32:10 PM PDT by Diddley (Hey Rip Van Kerry. Where’ve you been for the last 30 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: jpl
Really?

I think you're pretty naive to think that you would never consider pleading to a non-sexual misdemeanor to avoid the possibility of a felony sex crime conviction.

Let's list some of the things you'd avoid:
loss of voting rights
loss of gun rights
several years of quality time in a maximum security facility where sex offenders are at the bottom of the social structure (both literally and figuratively).
When you finally get out of prison you get to register as a sex offender every time you move
You get to put convicted felony sex offender on every job application you file (I'm sure they'll be really sympathetic to your claims of innocence)
471 posted on 08/04/2004 4:42:54 PM PDT by RatSlayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Howdy partner.
Nice to have you on FR.
We like to get to know our friends and neighbors.
Could you mosey on over to your profile page (under More/My Profile on the home page), and give us a word or two about yourself?
Thank you.


472 posted on 08/04/2004 4:45:04 PM PDT by Diddley (Hey Rip Van Kerry. Where’ve you been for the last 30 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
"Her lawyers say she did not have sex after the Bryant encounter. Like you, I made the point that if the male in question had an "alibi" (for lack of a better term) during the time period in question, there goes that theory. Her lawyers were emphatic and unequivocal. Their client was not with anyone after Bryant and before the exam."

____________________

First of all it is hardly likely that her attorneys were present so it really doesn't matter how "emphatic and enequivocal" they are the evidence says she was "with someone" after Bryant.

As far as the "alibi", if its his DNA that was found his alibi fails.

473 posted on 08/04/2004 4:51:30 PM PDT by daylate-dollarshort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: daylate-dollarshort

Wrong.


474 posted on 08/04/2004 4:53:35 PM PDT by cyncooper ("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

yeah, I was telling hubby that.... Was he on meds? He sounded like that comedian...I forget his name. He wouldn't even look up many of times... And that jerky smile/laugh... I think he was on meds, or has something wrong? Just too weird!


475 posted on 08/04/2004 4:54:48 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: daylate-dollarshort
so it really doesn't matter how "emphatic and enequivocal" they are the evidence says she was "with someone" after Bryant.

Mark Geragos was pretty danged emphatic that he'd produce the real killer of Laci Peterson, wasn't he?

476 posted on 08/04/2004 4:56:10 PM PDT by Howlin (Saving Private Hamster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
yep, not much either, other than maybe, just maybe he was partly gulity of stupidity! Takes 2 to tangle, and what the girl stated just had some questions to it... It'll all come out in the end.... ;o)
477 posted on 08/04/2004 4:56:22 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

If it's his DNA on the yellow pants, he can say whatever he wants. It's still his.

And it proves after Kobe sex.


478 posted on 08/04/2004 4:57:12 PM PDT by Howlin (Saving Private Hamster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies]

To: BushisTheMan
"First they have to produce the person she supposedly had sex with. Who is it since you are so EXACT and not nebulous?

_____________________

No they don't. All they have to show is that there was DNA and seminal fluid that didn't come from Bryant. The identity of the second (or more) individual can be asserted by the DNA evidence alone.

479 posted on 08/04/2004 4:57:25 PM PDT by daylate-dollarshort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I have an excellent grasp of the state of the record and I don't over-read into either side.

Some of the representations from Bryant defenders have not been testified to and have not been shown to be fact. Also contrary to other comments, many things that were initially claimed by Bryant defenders on these threads have turned out not to be true.

I will continue to recognize the defense for what they are.


480 posted on 08/04/2004 5:02:04 PM PDT by cyncooper ("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 601-606 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson