I'd like to know how harrowup stands and what the Heck he's talking about?
I want to know what he considers a "Radical Zionist", a 'regular' one, and what he sees as the solution to the Mideast problem (being he's Not? a "Zionist")
He is the Napolean Bone-apart of the insane left, except that I think he has himself all talked into his many masquerades. I also believe the doc forgot to give him his meds this week. Or maybe he is being weaned...and having a particularly hard time.
At any rate, even the revolting reform sect knows if your mama ain't Hebrew, you ain't either. And your daddy could be a Martian for all that matters...although both being Hebrew is a good thing.
Per Harrowup everyone on my (and Allouettes) ping list or who supports Israel on this forum is a radical Zionist, supporters of or infiltrators from the Kach and Kahane Chai terrorist groups, an ominously serious charge.
Second part, I've only seen him post it once here, below, he's more into disruption. It's a pretty radical view though, given the fact that it would apparently involve massive retaliation (PERHAPS, the left wing trap) against the palestinians, though only after they were given tactical advantage and the opportunity to murder the necessary number of Jews to "screw up". They're no where near that yet.
------------------------------
US President Bush Blocks Embassy Move to Jerusalem
Posted by harrowup to Salem
On News/Activism 06/20/2004 11:37:42 PM CDT #99 of 128
Your request will be taken under consideration should I ever read your opinions with which I am not very familiar. If I notice you use your ping list to attack legitimate differences of opinion with the JDL crowd here than I'll try to remember your grandstanding with due respect and diligence. That said, it should be clear to anyone here that the frothing at the mouth attacks on this thread are typical of those whose moral compass is too close to the flux capacitor.
There used to be a gentlemen's agreement and perhaps an unwritten rule that off site spats are best left off-site. However, I assume this spat has more to do with a thread which was pulled because of the obscene nature of the attacks a week ago.
Once again, given the tenor of the noise here by the Kahane bunch it should be clear who pushed the discussion into the benevolent bin of bombast.
I do not expect my more liberal views on the State of Israel to be welcomed here, but I will always insist that those who have no opinion are allowed to hear that the majority of Israeli citizens do not support the radical Zionist agenda.
I will repeat what my opinion has been and will always be that Israel withdraw from the settlements, return the captured territories to the United Nations and let them screw it up again, and then allow the Palestinian State to have space in Jerusalem for its Capitol on a short leash. They misbehave they get booted into the gutter.
I am positive the Palestinians will screw up but perhaps then we can openly allow the Israelis to do what they want to do. What ever that is may not be perfect and it may not be exactly what I would like but it will be what the citizens of Israel want and that is the way it should be.
Finally, if anyone wants to have a civil discussion they can do so, but I have no intention of responding to the irresponsible and juvenile attacks witnessed here for the simple reason that I promised Mr. Robinson that I would not use Free Republic to take names and kick butt. Anyone wants to take a whack at me at Liberty Post may do so, but I will remind them that LP currently has a keener appreciation of the use of the synomym for Clymers.