Ok. She's an adult. She is considered responsible for her own choices. Unless you want to raise the age of consent to 37 of course.
Secondly, I guess you're part of the reason PrimeTime Live does an "expose" of the porn industry, convienently scheduled during May sweeps. I should do an "expose" of network sweeps programming decisions - it turns out its not based on quality of programming but cheap stunts to attract viewers.
Which brings me to number three - most people (and believe me it's not just of couple of pervs who watch porn) are well aware of what types of sexual activities go on in porn - there are whole subgenres devoted to various acts.
In reality, there is no legitimate age of consent for intrinsic evils like pornography and abortion.
Intrinsic evils should be criminalized. The only subject for debate are the penalties that should be applied.
The "sweeps" argument is a red herring because last night's program was a public service.
Ever notice how quickly "outrage" is forgotten when one of the porn "stars" makes it on the networks?
My favorite example is Victoria Principal, but there are literally dozens of others.
This was a repeat,with a few updates.
This is especially the case here since this is basically a repeat of an "expose" they played last year.