Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Noted evolutionary biologist Maynard Smith dies
Contra Costa Times ^ | 24 April 2004 | Rosie Mestel

Posted on 04/24/2004 9:06:52 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

John Maynard Smith, one of the most influential evolutionary biologists of the latter part of the 20th century, has died. He was 84. Diagnosed with lung cancer more than a year ago, Maynard Smith died Monday at his home in southeast England, sitting in his high-backed chair and surrounded by his books.

Famed principally for applying a mathematical approach known as game theory to the study of evolution and his work on the evolution of sex, Maynard Smith is credited by colleagues with influencing evolutionary thought on broad areas in the life sciences.

"There is scarcely a branch of evolutionary or population genetic theory that has not been illuminated by his vivid and versatile inventiveness," evolutionary biologist and author Richard Dawkins wrote in 1993. He was one of many scientists who credited Maynard Smith's writings with sparking their interest in the field.

In his principle scientific contribution, Maynard Smith showed that game theory, a branch of mathematics that had previously been applied to economics, could be used to explain many aspects of animal behavior.

It could predict when a creature should fight and when it should back down, or when a male bird should stick around and help care for his young and when he would be better off abandoning the nest for a new mate, and myriad other behavioral choices.

Species, he argued, evolved what he termed "evolutionarily stable strategies" -- rules for responding to circumstances that remained stable in a population, because creatures that deviated from the rules were at a disadvantage.

In another substantial contribution, Maynard Smith tackled the mystery of why creatures evolved to have sex. This is a conundrum in evolutionary biology, because organisms that reproduce "clonally" -- that is, by making exact replicas of themselves without a genetic contribution from a male -- contribute more of their genes to the next generation and should therefore be at a selective advantage.

"Maynard Smith deeply wanted to understand why there are males around -- why on Earth do you need males? Why didn't you just have a population of females?" said Paul Harvey, head of the department of zoology at the University of Oxford. "He gave us all the logical tools for exploring what the answers might be."

In his influential 1978 book "The Evolution of Sex," Maynard Smith clearly laid out the problem and its possible theoretical solutions: for instance, two parents might be needed to help rear the young. Or it might be beneficial to mix up genes, via sex, to keep a species genetically varied and able to respond to changes in the world.

The solution remains a mystery.

He was born Jan. 6, 1920, in London, but spent much of his youth on and around the moors of southwest England, developing a keen interest in bird-watching and beetle-collecting as a child.

He was educated at the exclusive private boys school Eton College, an environment he disliked for its "snobbish" and "anti-intellectual" atmosphere -- but he credited it with teaching him mathematics very well and influencing his course in life. He noticed that his schoolmasters spoke with special contempt of another former Etonian, the famous biologist J.B.S. Haldane, whom they reviled as an atheist, divorcee and socialist.

"I remember thinking, 'Anybody they hate that much can't be all bad. I must go and find out about him,' " Maynard Smith said in a 2000 interview with Natural History magazine.

Refusing to join his family's stockbroker business, he studied engineering at Cambridge University; and during this time he joined the Communist Party. [Alas!] He broke ranks with the party by attempting to sign up for the army during World War II (but was rejected because of poor eyesight). He eventually resigned from the party, though he retained a leftist perspective throughout his life. [Whatcha gonna do?]

After researching stress in aircraft design during the war, he returned to study zoology at University College London, where Haldane was a professor. He worked with Haldane until 1965, when Maynard Smith became first dean of the new school of life sciences at the University of Sussex.

Officially retired from Sussex since 1985, he remained scientifically productive for decades afterward. Just days before his death, colleagues said, he was busy completing a manuscript on the evolution of religion and pursuing studies on the evolutionary genetics of disease-causing bacteria.

An approachable man with unruly white hair and thick glasses, Maynard Smith was remembered by colleagues and friends as a charismatic speaker but deadly debater, a lover of nature and an avid gardener, and a man who enjoyed nothing better than discussing scientific ideas with young researchers over a glass of beer in a pub.

"He was one of the most gracious people in the field; he made time for everyone, from the most famous to the lowliest graduate student," said Montgomery Slatkin, a professor in the department of integrative biology at University of California, Berkeley. "He'd go out with the graduate students, listen patiently to what they were working on and offer his help . . . and managed to make everybody feel he was a good friend."

Among his awards, Maynard Smith was a joint recipient of the 1999 Crafoord Prize, equivalent in stature to a Nobel, and the 2001 Kyoto Prize, Japan's highest lifetime achievement award. He was a fellow of Britain's Royal Society and was awarded the society's 1986 Darwin Medal and 1997 Royal Medal.

He was the author of hundreds of academic papers and 14 books, including "The Theory of Evolution" (1958), "The Evolution of Sex" (1978) and "Evolution and the Theory of Games" (1982.)

Smith is survived by his wife, Sheila; two sons; and a daughter.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: crevolist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
A good biologist, but like so many in academia, not very good when it comes to politics.
1 posted on 04/24/2004 9:06:52 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; LogicWings; Doctor Stochastic; ..
PING. [This list is for the evolution side of evolution threads, and some other science topics like cosmology. Long-time list members get all pings, but can request evo-only status. New additions will be evo-only, but can request all pings. FReepmail me to be added or dropped. Specify all pings or you'll get evo-pings only.]
2 posted on 04/24/2004 9:07:50 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Scientific theories should be developed to explain the data, rather than the dogma.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
He noticed that his schoolmasters spoke with special contempt of another former Etonian, the famous biologist J.B.S. Haldane, whom they reviled as an atheist, divorcee and socialist.

And now it's 'tother way around.

Ah, what I wouldn't give to pass away quietly at the age of 84 in my high-backed chair surrounded by my books. Hm. Better get myself a high-backed chair.

3 posted on 04/24/2004 9:12:23 AM PDT by prion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
How long before some creationist intimates that now the good doctor knows the errors of his ways?
4 posted on 04/24/2004 9:15:31 AM PDT by Junior (Remember, you are unique, just like everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; spetznaz
poNg
5 posted on 04/24/2004 9:15:38 AM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ...( Azadi baraye Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
The solution remains a mystery.

That means that we at Darwin Central can make it up as we go along, right? Unlike creaationists, who are stuck forever with the absolute truth, all 2000 versions of it.

6 posted on 04/24/2004 9:16:40 AM PDT by js1138 (In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Another Evolutionist gets to meet the Creator...Hmm what will they talk about?

"Maynard Smith deeply wanted to understand why there are males around -- why on Earth do you need males? Why didn't you just have a population of females?

Maynard...Its because the "Outtie" goes into the "innie".
and we get another one made in His image.

Maynard, you spent your whole life trying to figure that out?....And they made you a college professor?
no wonder you were a Commie and a Liberal.!! You "Evolved"
downward. Its the 2nd Law of Entrophy..Stupid people become
Commies and Liberals, and then become dumber, and more Liberal, and more stupid...etc. etc. etc.
7 posted on 04/24/2004 9:21:48 AM PDT by LtKerst (Lt Kerst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Six minutes, seventeen seconds.
8 posted on 04/24/2004 9:24:08 AM PDT by js1138 (In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Junior; Dataman
How long before some creationist intimates that now the good doctor knows the errors of his ways?

Why project? You brought it up at post 4. Must have been a "Word of Knowledge". Heh...

9 posted on 04/24/2004 9:27:44 AM PDT by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
John Maynard Smith, one of the most influential evolutionary biologists of the latter part of the 20th century

... and now a creationist.

10 posted on 04/24/2004 9:30:41 AM PDT by JHL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
"Maynard Smith deeply wanted to understand why there are males around -- why on Earth do you need males? Why didn't you just have a population of females?" said Paul Harvey, head of the department of zoology at the University of Oxford. "He gave us all the logical tools for exploring what the answers might be."

Possibly a lesbian preop/transsexual evolutionist?
11 posted on 04/24/2004 9:32:04 AM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Stockbrokers, don't raise your sons to be Commies... (Howard Dean, Maynard Smith...).

His problem with the Communist Party was timing: he must have tried to enlist during the period the Hitler-Stalin Pact was still in force, before June 22, 1941. After that, the Party would have been supportive.

12 posted on 04/24/2004 9:34:47 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
You had to know that a thread combining sex, politics, religion and evolution would head straight for the toilet.
13 posted on 04/24/2004 9:34:48 AM PDT by js1138 (In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LtKerst
I think you're onto something here -- Let's call it the Second Law of Thermoeducation. It shall assert that, due to entropy, all education will in time devolve into universal stupidity and no further thought will be possible.
14 posted on 04/24/2004 9:35:14 AM PDT by T'wit (There's no evidence "Bush lied." But I can PROVE Bill Clinton told the truth -- once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JHL
Or it might be beneficial to mix up genes, via sex, to keep a species genetically varied and able to respond to changes in the world.

Bingo - our ability to mutate allows for responding to external events and allows survival of the fittest and reporiduction of those who carry the genetic variant.

I really wish the evolutionists would stick to natural selection instead of the word evolution as it riles those who like to come a runnin and a thumpin.

15 posted on 04/24/2004 9:37:28 AM PDT by corkoman (Logged in - have you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: corkoman
oops - reproduction
16 posted on 04/24/2004 9:38:25 AM PDT by corkoman (Logged in - have you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: PatrickHenry
A very nice book is The Major Transitions in Evolution
John Maynard Smith and Eörs Szathmáry
Oxford University Press 1995
http://dannyreviews.com/h/Major_Transitions.html

here is a link to his office
http://www.biols.susx.ac.uk/faculty/biology/maynard.htm
18 posted on 04/24/2004 9:41:42 AM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: corkoman
I really wish the evolutionists would stick to natural selection instead of the word evolution as it riles those who like to come a runnin and a thumpin.

But evolution is the irreducible fact of nature, the observed phenomenon that "natural selection" purports to explain. If natural selection should be disproven, the fact of evolution--the change of lifeforms over time--will remain. And after all, it's the "natural selection" part that is controversial.

19 posted on 04/24/2004 9:46:41 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: js1138
You had to know that a thread combining sex, politics, religion and evolution would head straight for the toilet.

If only I could have worked in a Civil War angle ...

20 posted on 04/24/2004 10:11:38 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Scientific theories should be developed to explain the data, rather than the dogma.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson