I’m Tired of Neo-Cons Being Tired of Conservatives (Rant alert)

Aw, Shucks southern News and Links ^ | 29 January 2004 | Jeff Adams

[Jim Robinson]

Please don't do this.

[Orangedog]

And you know this how? The idea that there are paid agents of various political persuasions attempting to influence opinions on a new medium of communication such as the Internet is something that will occur to thinking adults, regardless of their caffeine intake. The purpose of these posts is to give tools to other freepers to pursue the site owners goal of driving out the moles, & sleepers. If you disagree with the owners decision to clear the decks please take it up with him.

I was mistaken. Switching to decaf would NOT help you...proper administration of lithium would. It's been clinically proven to help with the paranoid delusions of persecution that anyone posting over certain number of posts in a 12-hour period are certainly on the payroll of a maniacal billionaire. The owner of this sites intentions may be to "sweep the decks" of those who do not share his goals, but orchestrating delusional witch hunts based on the number posts anyone makes in a given amount of time probably doesn't qualify.

[Jim Robinson]

Never suspected you to be a whiner.

[Jim Robinson]

I think I actually hear violins in the background.

[Cultural Jihad]

Losing millions of white colored jobs

Looks like there's always a call for experienced spell-checkers and ESL instructors.

[Mike the lurker]

I see that you have posted for me various images of yourself in the guise of your different jobs.

I see that you were once a police officer, but gave it up
to pursue your dream, To Be A Clown!

And I see that you have succeeded in your quest, but tell me, how does your decades of experience as a professional circus clown, qualify you to comment on the American political scene?

But, I digress,

I have always believed that the Unreliable Right, are, and have been, an impediment to the cause of defeating, & destroying, in a political sense, the democrat party.

If all of you Unhappy Conservatives leave the Republican party, you will be replaced by members of the middle who will no longer be afraid of being Republicans.

My SWAG on this is we gain at least five for every one of you we lose.

Enjoy your descent into political irrelevance.


And, by the way, yes, you are still the enemy, & did you page Jim Robinson, & let him know how ya feel?

This is my last communication to you

[Willie Green]

It comes down to this, one way or the other, the moles, & plants, & sleepers, are going down.

IMHO, pompous and belligerent trolls who demand personal and confidential information about other forum participants are the ones who should get the boot.

Yes, this would certainly be a much more pleasant forum without the self-anointed Grand Inquisitor wannabes.

[Mike the lurker]

Don't worry Williekins, I'm gonna get around to you.

Here's one to chew on: you post & by that I mean, it is a day to remark on when you don't, every single day.

Including the holidays, in 2003, Memorial day, Independence day, Labor day, Thanksgiving, Christmas etc, etc, etc.

Now no normal person is gonna spend all their holidays posting doom & gloom when they could be outside having fun.

So you are either a fanatic to the point of unhealthy obsession or you aren't a real person at all, just an account name for the boiler room at the union hall.

You stink like a Rat and always have!

[Willie Green]

Don't worry Williekins, I'm gonna get around to you.

What? You think you're capable of browbeating me into revealing my Social Security number and Credit Card Accounts too??

LOL! Go conduct your lunatic witch hunt elsewhere.

[Mike the lurker]

Non responsive answer.

How can you be a real person, & spend ALL your time posting doom & gloom, & of course the ultimate in non conservativeness, Rail Roads!

You want to take us back to the 19th century, & use the state, through the use of the tax power, to subsidize your rail road dreams.

I bring up the railroad nonsense, in order to point out yet another contradiction in Willie Green Conservatism, people don't like taking trains,streetcars,trolleys, etc ( that is why they died in the 20th century!

So, in order to get people to ride these trains, & light rails, that they don't want to use, you must use the power of the state to compel them to do so.

So when we can spend more time chatting, and by that I mean we are finally gonna find out:

Who Pays Willie Green?


Till then, I got other fish to fry.

[Mike the lurker]

"Please don't do this."

I will of course follow your decree

[Willie Green]

Who Pays Willie Green?

My personal finances are NONE of your business. PERIOD.

[MJY1288]

Good job Mike, I know you had a few of your post pulled, but I understand your frustration with the "Purist" around here who think the CIC can just ignore the 50% of Americans who didn't vote for him and abandon the promises he made during his campaign in order to conform to the ideals of such losers as Pat Buchanan or Harry Browne and guarantee himself to be a one term president and hand the keys to the White House to a two faced loser like John Kerry.

Why some people can not compromise on things like domestic spending for education and our farmers when we have top notch Conservative judges being nominated, reducing the .N. to a useless debating society with the least amount of influence on American foreign policy at anytime I can remember. Standing up for the rights of the unborn, Getting us of Kyoto for good and abandoning the ABM treaty, Plus 3 tax cuts. I could go on! but my point is... these people would be perfectly willing to hand over the reigns of power just because this President hasn't given up his principles in order to satisfy theirs.

I guess it's OK to break campaign promises as long as the ends justify the means. And they have the nerve to call themselves principled conservatives, Go Figure!!

Keep up the fight my friend, these people are shallow, very shallow

[MJY1288]

Jim, Would you mind telling me why Mike the Lurker should be told to stop confronting these Bush Bashers who post 24/7 in an effort to smear the POTUS, I posted your own words above as back-up for my own stand for this President, in order to make the point that we have a simple choice next November, and anyone who is trying to peel off support for George W. Bush is helping what ever loser the Dems nominates. Im my rule book, they are just as much of an enemy as some DU troll when they refer to the Commander-in-Chief in the terms they have on this thread.

[Jim Robinson]

I really do not want people trying to dig into the private backgrounds of our posters. The trolls show their hands soon enough.
Thanks,
Jim

[Joe Hadenuf]

Never suspected you to be a whiner.

LOL! Come on Jim. I've been wolfpacked many times and never said a word, and never rang the AM bell. Not my style. I can count the times I complained in four or five years on one hand.

I think maybe part of the problem is that you lay down law that favors one side of the argument/debate and when those on the politically accepted side lash out with name calling etc, it seems that it's tolerated. Maybe I am wrong Jim, but it just seems that way to me. I'd bet the rent that if I had directed that language to him, or worse, I wouldn't be here right now. Just a guess.

In any event, hope your having a good evening......Long day for me, one I'd rather forget.

[MJY1288]

I didn't see post 680, so I didn't know why you posted what you did, so I don't know what was posted by Mike the Lurker. If it was personal info about another Freeper that was being posted I understand, but if it was questioning the motives of a Bush Basher who posts nothing but negativity, I don't.

If someone asked me what I did for a living, I would either tell them that I own and operate my own Auto Body Shop and have been fixing wrecked cars all my life, or tell them it was none of their business. But if I was trashing the only conservative that will face the Dem candidate next fall, I would expect to be asked what my motives were.... Am I wrong?

[NittanyLion]

I think maybe part of the problem is that you lay down law that favors one side of the argument/debate and when those on the politically accepted side lash out with name calling etc, it seems that it's tolerated.

I made the same observation the other day. It speaks to the persuasiveness of your arguments as well as your self-restraint that you're able to overcome that obstacle and make your point known.

The way I look at it, a solid argument will carry the day in the face of nonsensical rants and attacks. It just makes those who attack you look stoopid while bolstering your argument.

[Joe Hadenuf]

I really do not want people trying to dig into the private backgrounds of our posters. The trolls show their hands soon enough. Thanks, Jim

I just read that post. I appreciate that Jim. I think it's fine for a poster to ask what someone may do for a living. But that should be the extent of it.

When it reaches a point where the questions turn to demands, regarding, who pays their salary, the name of the organization/company they may work for, and other specific details surrounding their gainful employment, is crossing the line. IMHO.

Joe.....

[Joe Hadenuf]

I tend to agree with that.