Replies

Good job Mike, I know you had a few of your post pulled, but I understand your frustration with the "Purist" around here who think the CIC can just ignore the 50% of Americans who didn't vote for him and abandon the promises he made during his campaign in order to conform to the ideals of such losers as Pat Buchanan or Harry Browne and guarantee himself to be a one term president and hand the keys to the White House to a two faced loser like John Kerry.

Why some people can not compromise on things like domestic spending for education and our farmers when we have top notch Conservative judges being nominated, reducing the .N. to a useless debating society with the least amount of influence on American foreign policy at anytime I can remember. Standing up for the rights of the unborn, Getting us of Kyoto for good and abandoning the ABM treaty, Plus 3 tax cuts. I could go on! but my point is... these people would be perfectly willing to hand over the reigns of power just because this President hasn't given up his principles in order to satisfy theirs.

I guess it's OK to break campaign promises as long as the ends justify the means. And they have the nerve to call themselves principled conservatives, Go Figure!!

Keep up the fight my friend, these people are shallow, very shallow

Jim, Would you mind telling me why Mike the Lurker should be told to stop confronting these Bush Bashers who post 24/7 in an effort to smear the POTUS, I posted your own words above as back-up for my own stand for this President, in order to make the point that we have a simple choice next November, and anyone who is trying to peel off support for George W. Bush is helping what ever loser the Dems nominates. Im my rule book, they are just as much of an enemy as some DU troll when they refer to the Commander-in-Chief in the terms they have on this thread.