Skip to comments.
Savage: Impeach Bush over immigration plan
WND ^
| 1-12-04
| N/A
Posted on 01/13/2004 5:54:13 AM PST by JustPiper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,100, 1,101-1,120, 1,121-1,140 ... 1,361-1,362 next last
To: JoeSchem
I always considered him a part of the far right. So now you're far right if you think America's borders should be defended.
Maybe extreme would have been better.
1,101
posted on
01/14/2004 4:55:57 AM PST
by
evad
(Welcome back Joe Gibbs...we've been waitin')
To: Republican Wildcat
"You are obviously not a listener to either one, but yet you comment on them anyway."
Please!
I listen to them everyday and they are cheerleaders plain and simple.
Whenever a Democrat makes a mistake or a dumb comment they both pile on them unrelentlessly. Whenever a Republicrat makes the same mistake ir dumb comment they try to find the good in it. they may sya it is bad yes but there is a HUGE difference in how they present it. To say otherwise you would be fooling yourself.
1,102
posted on
01/14/2004 4:57:06 AM PST
by
AbsoluteJustice
(By the time you read this 100 other Freepers will have posted what I have said here!)
To: JustPiper
"Thank you for your service AJ!"
Why thank you very much and thank you for your troop support!
1,103
posted on
01/14/2004 4:58:13 AM PST
by
AbsoluteJustice
(By the time you read this 100 other Freepers will have posted what I have said here!)
To: lentulusgracchus
May I disagree? Clinton and his deal with Jiang Zemin was the worst. That's the deal that traded Loral's technology to the PLAYou might be surprised if you looked into the lobbyist outfit that Loral used.
1,104
posted on
01/14/2004 5:50:07 AM PST
by
steve50
("There is Tranquility in Ignorance, but Servitude is its Partner.")
To: JustPiper
The 8-10 million illegal number almost rivals Mitch Snyder's homeless hype from years ago.
1,105
posted on
01/14/2004 6:12:00 AM PST
by
PGalt
(Freepers - the most informed citizens on the planet.)
To: Poohbah
If they don't bring the money to pay --- that should be a crime.
1,106
posted on
01/14/2004 6:12:26 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: Texasforever
There has NEVER been a business in history that could survive as a profit making enterprise that cared more about its workers than its profit.In the days when you could find a smart CEO such as Henry Ford, there was more of that --- he went against the grain, paid his workers what was considered to be very excellent pay for those days --- so they could afford to buy the product they made. Henry Ford invented the assembly line in order to bring about efficiency. Most companies today fail because the CEO's are not especially wise or brilliant men. They don't know how to run a company, they don't know how to make for efficiency, they believe adding a thousand inefficient but cheap workers is the key --- and the prices today are very high.
1,107
posted on
01/14/2004 6:24:59 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: Texasforever
Well you are not much of a Marine since there is no such thing as an Ex-Marine. You don't even know me Tex, yet you have the temerity and unmitigated gaul to question my qualifications as a Marine? What does that say about you? heh?
1,108
posted on
01/14/2004 6:46:51 AM PST
by
exmarine
( sic semper tyrannis)
To: AbsoluteJustice; Republican Wildcat
Whenever a Democrat makes a mistake or a dumb comment they both pile on them unrelentlessly. Whenever a Republicrat makes the same mistake ir dumb comment they try to find the good in it. There is a BIG difference in the Republican's idea of giving select foreigners a permit to work in the US and the Democrat's idea of giving them citizenship and free welfare. To say they are the same is a misunderstanding of the intent and outcome of the two ideas. The only thing I see around here that's the same as a Democrat's is the "Hate Bush and Impeach Him" liberaltarian club. And if you aver truly listened to them every day such that you claim, you wouldn't make your comment knowing that Rush and Hannity have both criticized Bush for his immigration idea. They are not cheerleaders. They are smart voters.
1,109
posted on
01/14/2004 7:25:00 AM PST
by
m1-lightning
(Weapons of deterrence do not deter terrorists; people of deterrence do.)
To: lentulusgracchus; Texasforever
I just don't like sweatshop operators and people who deliberately hire illegals, so they can break their people on the wheel.Knowing that sweatshops are not the same as slave work, are you a supporter of unionizing the workers so they can get better pay and benefits? Also are you a supporter of a raise in the minimum wage to prevent such breaking of people on the wheel?
1,110
posted on
01/14/2004 7:32:21 AM PST
by
m1-lightning
(Weapons of deterrence do not deter terrorists; people of deterrence do.)
To: JustPiper
I'm not a Savage fan. I got tired of alot he said while on MSNBC. But the liberals would call you a right-wing whatever simply because of following Bush so blindly.|
You say that like it's a bad thing. Personally, I couldn't care what the liberals called me.
To: MissAmericanPie
"They have been decieving themselves like that for three years now, out of fear, denial, ignorance of the outcome of cause and effect, because their concentration is not on cause and effect, but reading between the lines. It's like grabbing the hot end of a candle over and over and hoping for a different outcome each time. Lacking foresight is a real bad deal."Amen sister -- Excellent overall articulation and analysis.
To: AbsoluteJustice
Savage's personality is to pile on people with a rabidness unmatched by Rush or Sean. But that's HIS personality, that's his method. Anger takes many forms, but I have heard both of the aforementioned gentlemen get extremely angry without foaming at the mouth. I would pile on Democrats, too because nothing they say is ever right, and they are incapable of intellectually engaging in a debate of ideas. Republicans, on the other hand, though more often wrong lately than they have been, are at least right on some issues, when they aren't doing their best impersonation of Dems. And this is troublesome. Just because one does not foam at the mouth like Savage, does not mean they are not as angry. It's all personality and how it's delivered to the radio masses. Michael Savage is an extremely dynamic individual, and even though I listen to him while I'm working in my shop, there I times when I can't stomach him as well and have to turn off the radio and go take my blood pressure medication. ;-)
1,113
posted on
01/14/2004 7:58:18 AM PST
by
jaugust
("The greatest accomplishment is not never falling, but in rising after you fall." -Vince Lombardi)
To: jaugust
Savage's personality is to pile on people with a rabidness unmatched by Rush or Sean. But that's HIS personality,So you're saying that Savage is the Howard Dean of the Right?
To: JustPiper
Great article.
Sure is funny how so many are attacking the messenger.
To: jaugust
LOL very well put and said.
I like Savage because he speaks like and everyday person and doesn't cover it up in "political correctness" BS.
He says it like it is and if you don't like it guess what? He doesn't care.
He is very impassioned and lights a fire in myself to care about what the government is doing and tells us why we should care.
Brash? Yes. Honest? Sure he is.
He is truely a good American and one I follow with passion as well.
Good conversing with you.
1,116
posted on
01/14/2004 8:12:11 AM PST
by
AbsoluteJustice
(By the time you read this 100 other Freepers will have posted what I have said here!)
To: m1-lightning
"Also are you a supporter of a raise in the minimum wage to prevent such breaking of people on the wheel?"
Yes I am in support of the minimum wage. It is meant for those that have only a high school or no high school diploma with little or no skill to obtain work. It is not meant for a career wage. It is really IMO a deterrent to from ONLY accepting min wage and put in place for those that hate it to get up off their rears and better themselves.
1,117
posted on
01/14/2004 8:15:45 AM PST
by
AbsoluteJustice
(By the time you read this 100 other Freepers will have posted what I have said here!)
To: pawdoggie
"So you're saying that Savage is the Howard Dean of the Right?"
Have you ever listened to him? If so where do you ever come to the conclusion that he is the Howard Dean of the right?
Here is the difference....Howard Dean bashes and complains and never states what his resolution to the problem is.
Michael Savage may spend 30 min bashing ignorance but ALWAYS has at least an idea onto how to better the situation.
Sometimes he is wrong but it gets you thinking at least instead of listening to 3 hours of diatribe.
The same can never be said for Dean these days.
1,118
posted on
01/14/2004 8:20:16 AM PST
by
AbsoluteJustice
(By the time you read this 100 other Freepers will have posted what I have said here!)
To: All
After reading the President's speech four times, and after reflecting that he habitually means what he says, I must admit - I'm shocked that this proposal has enraged the Right. Here's a quick reference of quotes from the speech. If you believe he is lying, that's one thing. If you believe that GWB says exactly what he means.... well....
"First, America must control its borders".
"We have significantly expanded the Border Patrol- with more than a thousand new agents on the borders, and 40 percent greater funding over the last two years".
"...our borders should be shut and barred tight to criminals, to drug traders, to drug traffickers, and to terrorists".
"This program will offer legal status, as temporary workers, to the millions of undocumented men and women now employed in the United States".
"The legal status granted by this program will last three years and be renewable, but it will have an end. Participants who do not remain employed, who do not follow the rules of the program, or who break the law will not be eligible for continued participation and will be required to return to their home".
"Employers...must first make every reasonable effort to find an American worker for the job at hand". and... "They must report to the government the temporary workers they hire, and who leaves their employ, so that we can keep track of the people in the program, and better enforce immigration laws".
"Undocumented workers now here will be required to pay a one-time fee to register for the temp worker program".
Re: citizenship:
"They will not be given unfair advantage over people who have followed legal procedures from the start. I oppose amnesty, placing undocumented workers on the automatic path to citizenship".
earlier in the speech:
"About 14 percent of our nation's civilian workforce is foreign-born".
and finally:
"Our homeland will be more secure when we can better account for those who enter our country, instead of the current situation in which millions of people are unknwn, unknown to the law".
Well, that's it Freepers. The rest of the speech is feel-good stuff to make soccer moms and "moderates" see this proposal as 100% compassionate. Fluff, and masterfully written fluff, too.
My question for this thread: where do you see all the evil motives, the amnesty, and the impeachable offences?
Assuming, of course, you take the President at his word.
1,119
posted on
01/14/2004 8:21:41 AM PST
by
moodyskeptic
(weekend warrior in the culture war)
To: pawdoggie
Perhaps, every time I hear Howard Dean I have to take my BP meds. LOL
1,120
posted on
01/14/2004 8:22:25 AM PST
by
jaugust
("The greatest accomplishment is not never falling, but in rising after you fall." -Vince Lombardi)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,100, 1,101-1,120, 1,121-1,140 ... 1,361-1,362 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson