Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Changing Our Country
Vanity ^ | 12/15/03 | Self

Posted on 12/15/2003 11:16:07 PM PST by B4Ranch

Changing Our Country

John F. Kennedy wrote a small book in 1958 titled "A Nation of Immigrants" promoting freer immigration policies. It was the blueprint for a law that President Kennedy proposed in 1963, shortly before his assassination, to eliminate racial discrimination inherent in the nation's immigration system.

Two years later, JFK's "A Nation of Immigrants" idea became the The Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments of 1965 pushed through Congress with little fanfare as a tribute to the fallen president by his brothers, Edward and Robert Kennedy.

If we cannot now end our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity." John F. Kennedy

A Nation of Immigrants

You know what? America really is a nation of immigrants. Our parents, aunts and uncles and grandparents come from every country in the world and pretty much we all get along okay. Separatism was allowed in some areas but generally we assimilated with each other quite well.

Marrying each others sons and daughters, working side by side with recent legal immigrants doesn't seem to bother most Americans. From what I've seen in my 56 years we generally attempt to assist the newcomer to assimilate into our communities with ease. During lunch we ask questions about what their life was like in their home country and we tell stories our grandparents told us about what it as like back where our national heritage stemmed from.

Today our life is different. We have illegal aliens coming into our country who are refusing to assimilate and become part of our communities. They are refusing to speak English, demanding that we provide Spanish dialect speaking teachers. Abusing every welfare program that we have is intentional. Flipping their finger at the local cops who patrol their neighborhoods is a sign that they will continue to disobey our laws. Hit and run automobile accidents are so common today that our insurance rates have snowballed out of sight.

Somewhere along the line we were tricked. Yeah, I mean plain ole snookered into believing that what comes from the courtrooms or from Congress just has to be good for our beloved United States of America. We have the hardest damn time believing that another American would do something to intentionally hurt our beautiful country. The definition of "leader and/or leadership" was changed without any public discussion whatsoever.

First was President Nixon and his EPA's long discussions of biological diversity and the need to preserve native plants and animals . That makes sense if you enforce the plan with common sense. We weren't told that common sense would be prohibited from this idea. A multiple-species community doesn't mean what you and I think it does, but that's another subject.

Then out came the hyphenated heritage designations and secular flock titles, Irish-American, Chinese-American, French-American, Philippine-American, English-American,and Irish Catholics, American Jews, etc. This ticked off quite a few people because they had always considered themselves to be Americans first. Their great grandparents were the Irish, came from Ireland and when they were able to qualify for US citizenship, Americans. All descendants of them were just plain old Americans because they were born on America's soil. Many of these foreigners and first term Americans fought and died for America in the Wars. This was what brought our patriotism to the front porches of our homes and Main Street parades on July 4th. Secular divisions? What business is it of any political group what religion you are? As long as it isn't violent, stay out of that persons religious beliefs!

Bring forth the slow dilution and extinction of our Republic.

In the seventies and eighties, national origins, multiculturalism, and diversity became the key terms to the new political organizations and advocacy groups.

Electoral speeches all had to have the words "tolerance of diversity and cross-cultural effectiveness" to be considered acceptable. Politically acceptable speeches now were the only ones permitted to be broadcast on public radio and television stations.

Any subject deemed controversial was prohibited. You are subject to personal and financial discipline for mentioning anything that possibly stigmatizes or victimizes an individual on the basis of race or ethnicity.

Discriminatory admissions policies were used to buffer the mistermed diversity programs, actually separatist. If your heritage was from certain countries you would be admitted to the nations best colleges and universities using a point system. This commitment to ethnic freedom is even more insincere than a politician tromping about shaking hands for re-election votes.

The publicly stated basis of all of this was to cure discriminations of the past 150 years. Any group with self prejudicial beliefs of inferiority, mental or physical disabilities, poverty or lower education levels is eligible to apply for tax dollars free government funds available in dozens of entitlement programs. These politically controversial goals were a winner for the Democrats, so the Republicans decided to get in line with cash baskets of their own. They started promoting new programs, ignoring the past conservative moral traditions of "self responsibility". Today "self responsibility" is considered a fault in a persons character. You are viewed as a problem child who may not stand in line when told to do so.

With both major parties tossing tax dollars free government funds into the air for any all to reach out for, illegal immigration has once again became a national problem for the citizen who pays the bills. Police chiefs are afraid to publicly mention the actual numbers of illegal aliens in their jails fearing the numbers might prompt demonstrations. They have resorted to saying these costs are provided for with tax dollars federal government funds. (just a semi-lie) They keep forgetting to say "partially"! Then the profiling of criminals was outlawed to the detriment of many once reasonably safe cities. An officer must now justify, as if he were on the witness stand, every stop-and-question he undertakes of an illegal alien. There's no such requirement for a stop-and-question of white Americans.

Our current batch of sorry assed politicians in Congress and the Senate consider these entitlement programs woefully underinclusive, denying this giveaway franchise from their cohorts in local politics. So they keep pushing for larger pork barrels in the budgets. Governors are doing their best to keep up with the mad rush to give America away, demanding larger state budgets every term.

While giving speeches, being surrounded by parasites is considered an honor if you are a leader politician. Constitutional commitments to Oaths of Office are disregarded without fear of prosecution, shame or guilt now. Preaching the diversity lie appears to be a sure re-election tactic to the party leaders liars.

Have you ever heard of the word "essentialism" (n) -The practice of categorizing a group based on an artificial social construction that imparts an "essence" of that group, which homogenizes the group and effaces individuality and difference.

Was this part of "The United Nations Agenda 21 Plan"?

The illegal alien population in the United States today is more than twice the total of 1986. By using diversity and "essentialism" our political and judicial leader liars have once again separated America into racial and ethnic groups.

Was this part of "The Plan"? I think so. My reasoning for this is because under federal guidance we are looking at our neighbors and co-workers wondering if the grandparents or parents perhaps overstayed a visitors visa fifteen or twenty years ago. We are wondering if we can trust someone who speaks with an accent, could they be a criminal and just hasn't been arrested yet. Should we report our suspicians to the Border Patrol.

We have been intentionally divided in hyphenated heritage congregations and secular flocks. The reason for dividing us into small groups who quickly question the motives of all other groups is to make it difficult for us to join together and fight a common problem. Having ten small uncoordinated groups threatening you is much easier to deal with than having one large determined group, with a common purpose, surrounding your home or office.

Public resources are being spent on, confining, investigating crimes, injuries and deaths of illegal aliens. Hispanic and Latino political organization advocacy groups are demanding driving rights for themselves, criminal aliens. The security of your state drivers license identification has diminished because of nationwide counterfeiting and corrupt DMV employees.

Do not be surprised if Homeland Security says it cannot stop this from continuing and America must have a National Identification Card Program.

We are under attack by two predators, illegal aliens and ineffective and/or corrupt government officials.

How can government officials ignore the massive invasion of illegal immigrants. President Bush refuses to speak on the subject. According to a recent poll, 80+% of American citizens consider this to be a greater threat than terrorists to our national sovereignty and financial security.

Could this be a challenge to see if the once proud American citizens will actually fight for their own national sovereignty and financial security on American soil? Our troops don't have any difficulty fighting on foreign soil for the benefit of foreigners.

Mexico and 300 other nations send their lower class citizens to America for us to provide for their education, medical and income via jobs at the cost to American taxpayers and jobs.

The "Slide" has become a socialistic free fall.

The Republican Socialist Party has made many changes without informing it's membership under this president.

Our political leaders liars are refusing to:



TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: aliens; constitution; diversity; essentialism; illegalaliens; immigrantlist; immigration; johnfkennedy; leader; leadership; parasite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last
To: B4Ranch
I am disappointed that I am NOT on your list
81 posted on 12/16/2003 10:30:49 PM PST by clamper1797 (Conservative by nature ... Republican in Spirit ... Patriot by Heart ... and Anti Liberal BY GOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Lots of good stuff here.
Our democracy is already "dead" in many regards.
I do not know about the rest of you but I write and call my reps regularly on a wide range of issues from the borders, whats left of the constitution, our federal giveaways to foreign intrests and corporations and others. I have yet to see ANY action on any of these issues from my reps. In fact the democrats send me back condescending letters explaining why they are correct in what they are doing, and essentially saying "piss off, citizen".
IMHO this will not change until people take it seriously. I'm afraid that won't happen until we are literally run from our homes by our compassionate leaders.
82 posted on 12/17/2003 8:55:35 AM PST by KEVLAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: KEVLAR; clamper1797; Jackie222; DLfromthedesert; Tailgunner Joe; MissAmericanPie; DoctorMichael; ...
Our President has done a transformation that few expected, fake right and run left. He is pushing the Dem's so hard they have swung around the goal posts and appear to be running to the right center, of course we know that when the blockers (voters) are worn down they will continue to run left taking America into a dictatorship.

Our democracy is already "dead" in many regards.

By 2008 we must be ready to stand in line as told or you will be incarcerated for the slightest disobeyance of "law".

Be on the lookout for what Congress does in the next couple of years regarding international treaties with the United Nations. Congress authorizes these international treaties which give federal jurisdiction to the federal government. The desired effect is to expand the scope of federal authority over State Constitutions. These international treaties give federal agencies the lawful right to exercise them with federal police powers and the right to enforce federal criminal laws nationwide.

The Dem's have been the major promoters of these treaties, however remember President Nixon was the one who started us out with the EPA, so the Rep's don't have any difficulty either in crunching your State Constitutions to ineffective pieces of historic paper.

Even though most politicians are lawyers, they do not fully understand what is going on. The party leaders do along with the attorney general and of course federal judges. Anyone sticking their nose into this stuff without invitation is threatened with no Party assistance at the next election. This keeps everyone in control.

When Agenda 21 is firmly in place it will be authorized by Congress under the UN direction. This will be the complete end of our nation as a Republic. It won't matter what Party is in office, they will have to follow the Agenda 21 rulings.

So unless you are prepared to live under a dictatorship get off your butts and educate your local politicans about what is happening.

83 posted on 12/17/2003 3:14:18 PM PST by B4Ranch (Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
Changing tag line
84 posted on 12/17/2003 3:34:10 PM PST by clamper1797 (I want my Constitution back !!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
That is a reasonable demand.
85 posted on 12/17/2003 4:27:08 PM PST by B4Ranch (Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
B4

There isn't anything here I disagree with. Excellent piece of work.

86 posted on 12/17/2003 4:36:32 PM PST by 4.1O dana super trac pak (Don't avoid. Read Joe Guzzardi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Any suggestions on the education of our local officials.
Letters and phone calls don't seem to be getting through. If I thought they would see me, I'd show up at their offices.
87 posted on 12/17/2003 4:50:54 PM PST by KEVLAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
"Be on the lookout for what Congress does in the next couple of years regarding international treaties with the United Nations."

Exactly. And the heart of the problem is probably the worst mistake the Founders ever made, that is, Clause 2 of Article Six of the Constitution.

"Clause 2: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. "

When our country will have lost its precious sovereignty, along with the Bill of Rights, every officer of the military, Homeland Security, the FBI, ATF, and every other part of the police-state apparatus, will be bound by those treaties. They will be "Constitutionally-sworn" to obey the "supreme law of the Land". Whoever the President is, he (or she) will not have betrayed their country by signing the bill. They will have acted as our representative and enacted our "will".

I've fought years to get people to recognize that the Constitution needs to be amended to strike Clause 2 and replace it with a clause that establishes the charge of treason for any official of the government who seeks to lessen US national sovereignty through treaty with any foreign power or entity. It is the only way to make sure that Agenda 21, and the chilling UN Millennium Treaty does not become the supreme law of America.

As for me, no matter how old I am, I will fight such a development. If a US administration sells out our country, I will take up arms in its defense, just as I have in the past. I hope and pray that this doesn't happen.
88 posted on 12/17/2003 4:52:07 PM PST by Stephen Ritter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Bump
89 posted on 12/17/2003 5:46:05 PM PST by Klickitat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx
I made my first ever political donation a couple of months ago, $25.00 to Tancredo. Felt good.
90 posted on 12/17/2003 6:07:39 PM PST by 4.1O dana super trac pak (Stop the Open Borders Death Cult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: KEVLAR
Invite the person to go to lunch with you and ask that they bring another person or a dozen, whatever you can get.

You might print out #83 and #88 to use as guidelines. When you are discussing this subject, remember to mention Mom, Dad, grandkids, your kids.

MAKE IT VERY VERY PERSONAL AND KEEP SMILING DURING THE TALK. BE FRIENDLY WITH EVERYONE. ALSO, STRESS THE LOSS OF AUTHORITY TO LOCAL OFFICIALS.

"You were raised in this town, is this what you want to see happen to the authority of our elected officials? No, of course not. So, ladies and gentlemen, I am asking what do we do to stop Agenda 21 here in our town. I voted for you because I trust your decision making capabilities when it comes to my family's protection, etc. Well, now I'm scared because I don't think you're aware what is over the horizen. What needs to be done to retract any and all inplace Agenda 21 programs."

Do not discuss anywhere except your town. Your mayor isn't concerned what the voters 30 miles away think of him/her.

91 posted on 12/17/2003 6:23:43 PM PST by B4Ranch (Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: KEVLAR
Whenever you visit your Reps office, always have your check book in your shirt pocket where they can see it. Answers will flow forth when they see the check book.
92 posted on 12/17/2003 6:26:01 PM PST by B4Ranch (Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Ritter
When our country will have lost its precious sovereignty, along with the Bill of Rights, every officer of the military, Homeland Security, the FBI, ATF, and every other part of the police-state apparatus, will be bound by those treaties.

We'll get no help from an increasingly detached Supreme Court either. I can't believe some of the decisions they have made in recent months that were obviously unconstitutional. And that's considered a conservative Court.

93 posted on 12/17/2003 6:36:21 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Living in San Jose, every May 5th, you would see all sorts of cars driving slowly in San Jose, displaying Mexican flags. There is something wrong about that.
94 posted on 01/08/2004 6:56:09 PM PST by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frohickey
That would be enough for me to do some serious job searching out of state! I have no plans on learning to speak Spanish or any other language for that matter.
95 posted on 01/09/2004 7:30:57 AM PST by B4Ranch (Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson