[ckca]

Jim Robinson has stated in the past that even if under subpoena he would NEVER reveal identifying confidential information about individual FReepers.

[PhiKapMom]

So that gives you guys free reign to post whatever you want, when you want rather you have the facts or not because you can stand behind Jim saying he would never divulge private information?

What a bunch of misguided people there are on here if they feel they can say anything they want and stand behind Jim's statement so he takes the fall not you. BTW, all we have is your say on what Jim said and I have no doubt under most circumstances he would protect the identity of Freepers! That said, there are circumstances where I can see he would cooperate with law enforcement!

Freepers better watch what they post about the President or anyone under USSS protection because Jim or no one else is ever going to stand by and let those statements stand and protect the people that said them!

Don't you think that posting outrageous statements while hiding behind a screen name is childish and not worthy of this site or Jim's support of Freepers. Why would anyone want to put Jim in jeopardy by posting their suppositions as facts and letting their feelings get in the way of actual facts when they don't even know the people involved?

[Modernman]

Jim Robinson has stated in the past that even if under subpoena he would NEVER reveal identifying confidential information about individual FReepers.

How about under a court order? That's quite different from a subpoena.

I'd hope that the individual FReepers involved in such a situation would have the intengrity to break their anonymity, rather than rely on Jim's going to jail to protect them.

[sinkspur]

Jim Robinson has stated in the past that even if under subpoena he would NEVER reveal identifying confidential information about individual FReepers.

As I remember, a FReeper got a visit from the Secret Service for a perceived threat against Clinton, and the name of that FReeper was furnished to them by Jim.