Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

March 2003 Top Secret Memo: TRANSFER OF SPECIAL AMMUNITION (POTENTIAL CHEMICAL WEAPONS) Translation
Pentagon/FMSO Iraq Pre-War Documents ^ | April 17 2007 | jveritas

Posted on 04/17/2006 8:40:37 AM PDT by jveritas

Document ISGP-2003-0001498 ISGP-2003-0001498 contains a 9 pages TOP SECRET memo (pages 87-96 in the pdf document) dated March 16 2003 that talks about transferring “SPECIAL AMMUNITION” from one ammunition depot in Najaf to other ammunition depots near Baghdad. As we know by now the term SPECIAL AMMUNITION was used by Saddam Regime to designate CHEMICAL WEAPONS as another translated document has already shown. For example in document CMPC 2004-002219 where Saddam regime decided to use “CHEMICAL WEAPONS against the Kurds” they used the term “SPECIAL AMMUNITION” for chemical weapon http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1601810/posts. What is also interesting is that these “SPECIAL AMMUNITION” were listed as 122 mm, 130 mm, and 155 mm caliber shells which are not by itself SPECIAL unless it contain CHEMICAL WEAPONS. In fact the Iraqi have always used 122 mm, 130 mm, and 155 mm caliber shell as a main delivery tool for Chemical Weapons Agents by filling these type of shells with Nerve Gas, Sarin, Racin, Mustard gas and other Chemical Agents.

Beginning of partial translation of Pages 85-96 in document ISGP-2003-0001498

In the Name of God the Merciful The Compassionate

Top Secret

Ministry Of Defense

Chairmanship of the Army Staff

Al Mira Department

No. 4/17/ammunition/249

Date 16 March 2003

To: The Command of the Western Region

Subject: Transfer of Ammunitions

The secret and immediate letter of the Chairmanship of the Army Staff 4/17/308 on 10 March 2003

1. The approval of the Army Chief of Staff was obtained to transfer THE SPECIAL AMMUNITIONS in the ammunition depots group of Najaf and according to the following priorities:

A. The first priority

First. Ammunition (122 mm)

Second. Ammunition (130 mm)

Third. Ammunition (155 mm)

To the depots and storage of the Second Corp and the two ammunition depot groups Dijla/2/3

B. Second priority.

First. Ammunition (23 mm)

Second. Ammunition (14.5 mm)

To the ammunition depots of the air defense and distributed to the ammunition depot groups in (Al Mussayeb- Al Sobra- Saad).

2. To execute the order of the Chief Army Staff indicated in section (1) above, we relate the following:

A. Duty

Transfer of the ammunitions shown in sections (A) and (B) from the ammunitions depots of Najaf to the ammunition depots in (Dijla 2/3, and Al Mansor, and Saad, and Al Mussayeb, and Sobra and Blad Roz and Amar Weys from March 16 till April 14 2003.

Signature…

General Rasheed Abdallah Sultan

Assistant to the Army Chief of Staff- Al Mira

March 2003

End of Partial translation

The remaining pages of this 9 pages top secret memo talk about getting the special vehicles to transfer the SPECIAL AMMUNITION and the people assigned to supervise and execute the transfer and they were top Iraqi Army and Military Intelligence officers.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: bush; bushdidntlie; chemicalweapons; iraq; iraqiintelligence; jveritas; media; mediabias; onfreep; prewardocs; sarindar; specialammunition; waronterror; wmd; wmds; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-317 next last
To: eyespysomething

Look at the question in the post I'm pinging you to. Don't know if you have a chance to run him through your sources ... LOL (Lexis/Nexis)


121 posted on 04/17/2006 12:09:04 PM PDT by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Just some right-wing nuts, as far as I am aware. (/MSM_OFF)


122 posted on 04/17/2006 12:15:11 PM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Someone pointed out it could be they gathered them altogether in a central location to be trucked and flown out to Syria.

You know, that would be my conclusion because I believe that's what happened to the WMD. But we know too that the invasion came long before Saddam expected it.

It could be that he was moving the weapons to a central location with the intent of distributing them to forces, got caught with his pants down when we did invade and then quickly evacuated the WMD to Syria ...

I imagine there are a lot of scenarios that are plausible.

123 posted on 04/17/2006 12:18:43 PM PDT by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Dog

This is the link to Hugh Hewitt's comments about Iraq and WMD.

http://hughhewitt.com/archives/2006/04/16-week/index.php#a001929

I have maintained for a long time that the REAL reason for the anti-american assaults on Operation Iraqi Freedom have little if anything to do with Iraq.

Even if Zarqawi has only recently given up on winning in Iraq, and the government will be formed soon, and Saddam will be executed soon, the REAL target of the anti-american assaults is the next war.

We see now the arguments against pulling an OSIRAQ attack on Iran's nuclear facilities include the "mistakes" in Iraq.

To quote The Right Brothers song, "Bush Was Right"!

The only open question publicly is what do we know about Iran, and what can we do to prevent them from going nuclear? Or it's North Korea. Or it's China.

The anti-americans want to prevent America from defeating the Axis of Evil. On the contrary, we must prevail.


124 posted on 04/17/2006 12:20:24 PM PDT by GEC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
Bimp.

OK, Clouseau, that's gotta be you!

125 posted on 04/17/2006 12:32:02 PM PDT by citizen (Yo W! Read my lips: No Amnistia by any name! And the White House has a fence around it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: citizen

Finally. LOL.


126 posted on 04/17/2006 12:35:12 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Self appointed RNC Press Secretary for Smarmy Sound Bites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Tony mentioned you on his show today. At least he is starting to get some of this information out.


127 posted on 04/17/2006 12:37:47 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Tony mentioned you on his show today. At least he is starting to get some of this information out.


128 posted on 04/17/2006 12:37:49 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Word to your mother?


129 posted on 04/17/2006 12:41:27 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (If low-skill workers were key to economic growth, Mexico would be an economic powerhouse.-Rich Lowry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

oh sure, I always look for the weakness as well, the only prob I see with this is it is almost too perfect.


130 posted on 04/17/2006 12:53:25 PM PDT by RayRobisonblog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder
"But we know too that the invasion came long before Saddam expected it."

That is not the way I recall it. We gave him over a years warning. That gave him plenty of time to get rid of the WMD before we got there.

131 posted on 04/17/2006 12:58:09 PM PDT by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

Comment #132 Removed by Moderator

To: jveritas

More background http://rayrobison.typepad.com/ray_robison/2006/04/iraq_document_o.html

Update: globalsecurity.org

"During his 05 February 2003 presentation to the UN Security Council, Secretary of State Powell stated that "I'm going to show you a small part of a chemical complex called "Al Musayyib", a site that Iraq has used for at least 3 years to transship chemical weapons from production facilities out to the field. In May 2002, our satellites photographed the unusual activity in this picture. Here we see cargo vehicles are again at this transshipment point, and we can see that they are accompanied by a decontamination vehicle associated with biological or chemical weapons activity. What makes this picture significant is that we have a human source who has corroborated that movement of chemical weapons occurred at this site at that time. So it's not just the photo and it's not an individual seeing the photo. It's the photo and then the knowledge of an individual being brought together to make the case. This photograph of the site taken 2 months later, in July, shows not only the previous site which is the figure in the middle at the top with the bulldozer sign near it, it shows that this previous site, as well as all of the other sites around the site have been fully bulldozed and graded. The topsoil has been removed. The Iraqis literally removed the crust of the earth from large portions of this site in order to conceal chemical weapons evidence that would be there from years of chemical weapons activity. " [Powell]

On on 10 February 2003 a joint UNMOVIC team of 10 inspectors visited the Al-Musayyib Ammunition Depot, located in the province of Al-Musayyib (Babil Governorate). Inspectors questioned the site custodian about the number of warehouses and the number of new buildings at the site, as well as the types of ammunition stored there, the Iraqi Foreign Ministry stated. Inspectors reportedly searched the warehouses using chemical sensors and X-ray devices and collected samples from an 81-millimeter missile, the ministry added.

Al Atheer and Al Musayyib were merged into the the Motassim company which was part of the al Rashid State Establishment. "

Ray: The document lists one of the receiving depots as "Al Mussayeb" which is probably al Musayyib in Powell's speech.


133 posted on 04/17/2006 1:09:00 PM PDT by RayRobisonblog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
You're amazing and need to keep up the great work!

Maybe you should get yourself an agent, who will shop your translations to publishers, and put ALL of them in a book. That way, the damned MSM would have to take notice and this news would finally get out. Just a thought..........

134 posted on 04/17/2006 1:09:37 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Many thanks for the ping!


135 posted on 04/17/2006 1:10:16 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Spunky; eyespysomething
That is not the way I recall it. We gave him over a years warning. That gave him plenty of time to get rid of the WMD before we got there.

I'm drive-by Freeping today and don't have time to look through the old PreWarDoc threads, but if you find the stories from a couple of weeks ago about the Russians providing Saddam with info just before the invasion of Iraq, you'll see that the Russians and Saddam were under the impression that we wouldn't invade until we had a certain unit in place.

When we struck, that unit was not in place.

Sorry for the vague response, but I assure you that we hit well before Saddam thought we were going to.

136 posted on 04/17/2006 1:11:26 PM PDT by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Coop; Grampa Dave; Allegra; Marine_Uncle; NormsRevenge; Gucho; TexKat
Interesting reading, eh?

Now that's an understatement!!!

137 posted on 04/17/2006 1:13:06 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder; Spunky

Was it the unit that was supposed to go into Iraq from Turkey?


138 posted on 04/17/2006 1:15:24 PM PDT by eyespysomething (American liberals like everything about the struggle for freedom except the struggle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: RayRobisonblog; jveritas

The puzzle is coming together nicely!

Thanks for the Great work....


139 posted on 04/17/2006 1:15:56 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: RayRobisonblog
oh sure, I always look for the weakness as well, the only prob I see with this is it is almost too perfect.

As jveritas pointed out, regardless of whether it was a ruse to try to fool his own troops or an honest top secret document ordering the movement of chemical weapons, it absolutely destroys the left's "Bush lied people died."

Here's the proof that the WMD existed in Iraq at least on paper ... Bush believed they existed because Saddam wanted people to believe they existed. There was no lie.

This document is probably the most significant WMD document I've seen both because of what it says and, more importantly, because of when it is dated. Of course, the bin Laden/Iraq connection documents are the best in terms of proof that Saddam needed to be eradicated from this world.

140 posted on 04/17/2006 1:16:51 PM PDT by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-317 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson