To: Burkeman1; mcsparkie; HiTech RedNeck; gore3000; Dataman; AndrewC; scripter; beckett; Cicero; ...
ping.
To: *crevo_list
Index ping.
5 posted on
02/11/2003 10:33:06 PM PST by
scripter
To: Junior; PatrickHenry
Ping.
9 posted on
02/12/2003 10:48:14 AM PST by
balrog666
(When in doubt, tell the truth. - Mark Twain)
To: Aric2000; balrog666; Condorman; *crevo_list; donh; general_re; Godel; Gumlegs; Ichneumon; jennyp; ..
Ring ping-a-ling.
10 posted on
02/12/2003 10:50:23 AM PST by
Junior
(The New World Order stole your tag line)
To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
it is a problem or worse for neo-Darwinism (as for Darwinism) how altruistic behavior could survive and spread in any population of animals. No, it's not. There is a whole camp of explanations sometimes called "red queen" theories, and both the evidence and arguments are quite straightforward.
11 posted on
02/12/2003 11:10:48 AM PST by
donh
To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
7 pages to debunk a semantic misunderstanding? Hardly worth getting excited over.
A gene whose expression increases its chance of getting passed to subsequent generations quite naturally should experience an increase in expression over time.
How is this controversial again?
16 posted on
02/12/2003 3:20:26 PM PST by
Condorman
("Never tell me the odds!" -- H. Solo)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson