Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Burkeman1; mcsparkie; HiTech RedNeck; gore3000; Dataman; AndrewC; scripter; beckett; Cicero; ...
ping.
2 posted on 02/11/2003 7:23:40 PM PST by Ethan Clive Osgoode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
I cannot speak for others, but for my own part, it is impossible to read these words without feeling anxiety for Dr. Dawkins's sanity. I try to think of what I, or anyone, could say to him, to help restrain him from going over the edge into absolute madness.

Naturalists simply cannot account for human nature with their materialistic presuppositions.

6 posted on 02/12/2003 4:14:35 AM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode; donh
The Red Queen theories, or the thought that there really is no such thing as altruism in nature, that it's only an anthropomorphic machination. Ironically, these perceived altruistic behaviors are thought to be more proof of evolution through preservation of the gene pool.

If only creationists tried a little science once in a while, rather than simply being hack literary critics, maybe they'd learn a thing or two.
14 posted on 02/12/2003 1:32:13 PM PST by whattajoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson