Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUBOB 11- more tales from the Dark UnderBelly Of the Beast...
various links and websites | 01-31-03 | The Heavy Equipment Guy

Posted on 01/31/2003 5:07:21 PM PST by backhoe

At the request of members, I am restarting those "Tales from the Dark UnderBelly Of the Beast"-- the stories and issues that the press and media either ignore, won't even talk about, or will mention once and forevermore claim "it's old news..."

Naturally, some will be stories which interest me, or things I think we all need to be aware of.

I am experimenting with a minor change in presentation- when I can, I will cut to

-GoogleNewsBeta--

with a keyword or two and see what kind of links to "mainstream" stories I can find in contrast to what we see here and on other sites.

May I remind you of a couple of points to bear in mind?
Each link usually has many other links within- follow them all to get "the rest of the story."
Don't forget the "open multiple browsers" trick with control-n -- this allows you to hold your place with one, and use the others to follow links, run searches, etc.

Rather than go back and rehash old links, I'll give you links to the original posts here:

-DUBOB 10- the *best of* the Dark Underbelly Series--

-DUBOB 9-- even *more* tales from the Dark Underbelly of the Beast..... --

DUBOB 8-- still *more* tales from the Underbelly***

DUBOB 7-- even *more* tales from the Dark Underbelly of the Beast.....

DUBOB 6-- yet *more* tales from the Dark Underbelly of the Beast.....

DUBOB 5-- even *more* tales from the Dark Underbelly of the Beast.....

DUBOB IV- yet more Tales from the Dark Underbelly of the Beast-

DUBOB III -- "Tales from the Dark Underbelly of the Beast"

DUBOB 2-- more tales from The Dark Underbelly of the Beast-- thread II

-The Dark Underbelly of the Beast- Stories the Media won't Discuss...--


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: americans4prosperity; davidharsanyi; dubob; erichoffer; kochbrothers; lamestreammedia; oldmedia; thetruth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 7,661-7,6807,681-7,7007,701-7,720 ... 12,501-12,502 next last
To: All
Mexican Official Promotes North American Union--a swift move toward a European Union-style merger of the U.S., Canada and Mexico.
 
Losing Sovereignty with CAFTA - Costa Ricans vote this weekend (US alread approved)
 
SYRIA STRIKE: It was nukes, and the U.S. Intelligence Community nearly blew it again, according to ABC: "The September Israeli airstrike on a suspected nuclear site in Syria had been in the works for months, ABC News has learned, and was delayed only at the strong urging of the United States." Condi Rice looks bad, too. Meryl Yourish has some tart comments.
 
Tiny 'Tin Whiskers' Imperil Electronics--Swell... The whole world has to live with crappy unreliable electronics because of this EU insanity. Reminds me of the "freon" ban in the 90s that has just about killed our space shuttle program.
 
Groups Target Lawmakers on Veto Override [SCHIP]
 
(Vanity) Hot Enough for Ya? (or "Where's the Global Warming crowd now"?)
 
The Great Global Warming Swindle [ 1 ... 3, 4, 5 ]
 
Body and Lies Carved in Stone Are Removed From National Shrine (did Clinton sell military burials?)--The president rewarded Lawrence — who gave $200,000 to the Democrats in 1992 and raised millions more — with an ambassadorship to Switzerland and eulogized him at his funeral service at Arlington, the nation’s hallowed resting place for its most cherished heroes.
And his stunned family and friends lament the fact that Lawrence will be remembered more for the lies he told than the things he did.
 
Latest from NutJob Central:
Ahmadinejad: West Taken Captive by Zionists ("the axis of Zionism?")
 
Atlantic City Mayor, Phony Green Beret, Under Investigation... but a Democrat?--Once again, the AP seems to have forgotten to mention the party affiliation of a wretchedly corrupt Democrat who is under fire for his perfidy.
 
Bangor ready to re-enact Brady Gang shootout
 
I, FOR ONE, WELCOME our new Civil Service overlords.
 
Graphic pix of sex-fest sent to sponsor's hometown (Miller Beer gay festival-- oh my...)
 
'Lake of Fire' takes camera into abortion clinics (About time)
 
Why Not Just Cut Other Spending?
 
I Guess Children Should Be Seen And Not Heard [Bush Derangement Syndrome]--That seems to be the operating philosophy of Bush Derangement Syndrome sufferers in Lancaster County, PA. When George Bush passed through for a visit on Wednesday, workers from a local day-care center led three dozen children in singing songs to greet the President as he arrived. That set off the BDS contingent, who made sure no one heard the children singing:

7,681 posted on 10/06/2007 9:34:03 AM PDT by backhoe ("It's so Easy to spend somebody else's Money..."[ My Dad. circa 1958 ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7680 | View Replies]

To: All
Zimbabwe Only Harvest 1/3 of Needed Wheat
 
Anyone bought a car in the USA and brought it back home?
 
Just importin' the gang warfare Americans are too lazy to do...
MS-13 member arrested[caught three times for illegal entry]
 
"Border" to show again in Houston area [Augusta, GA; Savannah, GA and Palm Springs, CA]
 
Fallout from "The Decade of Fraud(s)"-- the 1990's:
 
Clinton's Phony WWII 'Hero' --Dem. Campaign Donor, Ambassador, Phony Soldier
 
Cynthia McKinney to announce bid next week for the White House: Green Party
 
The Money behind the Politics - Who Gives, Who Gets, Who Wins

7,682 posted on 10/06/2007 1:00:37 PM PDT by backhoe (The 1990's? "The Decade of Fraud(s)...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
MEMORANDUM FOR FRED'S INSIDERS
 
Who Made Hillary Queen? (What has she ever done to deserve this eminence?)
 
Dogs On the Brink of Being Put Down
 
Not another one! Louisiana State Senate Candidate Joey DiFatta outed as restroom toe-tapper
 
 
Tiny "Crow-Cams" Capture Tool Use in Wild Birds
 

The Samson Option-- what is known about Israel's Nuclear Weapons?

U.S. Air Force: Israel has 400 nukes, building naval force

The latter report is illuminating, given that it is 4 years old, and the most commonly-quoted number of Israeli warheads is 200... wonder how many they really have?

Let's see if I can locate a snippet I wrote a while back, with a graphic. It's not pleasant to contemplate, be advised.



6 posted on 11/30/2005 1:57:22 PM EST by Jeff Head

To: Monterrosa-24; Jeff Head

Heartbreaking pictures! I've seen thousands of atrocity pics of that era but not these. Thanks.

Although it's been a while since I've seen those pictures, they never lose their impact. I always think about the women I've cared about, family, and friends.

Kindly note a few things...

1) In the first picture, some of those women are pregant. Double murder, IMO.

2) In the second picture, not all are dead- yet. Just badly wounded.

3) The only thing that could have saved them, was another group of hard men, with guns in hand. Think about that for a while.

Not marches, not laws, not protests, not protocols- real men, with real weapons.

41 posted on 11/30/2005 3:51:47 PM EST by backhoe
 
This is offered as an example of FR's long history on the Bloodtrail scandals ( have no idea if any links are still good )-- the following HTML graphic was the first thing I found on my first search for tainted blood information many years ago:


 
 
♪♪♪♪
 
Image hosting by Photobucket
 
 
JW-HS.JPG
 
http://www.pardonmyenglish.com/media/jesusland-new.jpg
 
 

 

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

 
 
 
 
 
 

7,683 posted on 10/06/2007 4:05:14 PM PDT by backhoe (The 1990's? "The Decade of Fraud(s)...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Fred Thompson Ahead of the Pack on Limbaugh "Phoney Soldier" Row
 
Senator Calls Treaty a "Disaster" For America--"The "Law of the Sea Treaty" appears to be a plot by our own State Department and the U.N. to surrender sovereignty to the thugs who run the U.N. "
 
The "Not So Poor" 12 Year Old Who Rebutted Bush on SCHIP Veto--a middle school student at the exclusive$20,000 per year Park School in Baltimore...Reid and Pelosi at it again...
according to the Baltimore Sun article it was Reid’s office that contacted the boy. The Senate staffers wrote his script, so they weren't even his own thoughts. Reid describes having the boy give the prepared speech as having a “real heavy weight”...ok, all groan with me in unison.
 
Michigan Bishops Launch Massive Statewide Stem Cell Education Program - Video Online
 
Funeral directors 'sold corpses for cash'
 
Bush: Terrorists don't represent Islam --How embarrassing this is.

Politicians, like diapers, need to be changed frequently, and for the same reasons...

Steve Forbes was my choice for the 2000 election cycle, but when it became apparent the The Powers That Be were going to anoint Bush II, I soldiered on- gave money, walked the streets, voted.

His first year was a disappointment- then 9-11 happened, and for a while I was proud.

It may be a coincidence, but when I got dropped from the Presidential mailing list in 2004, it seemed to me this Administration was going, increasingly, off the rails.

Now, I can't really wait until he, and everyone except Dick Cheney, is gone...

Ya all know what I think about TARP...



Islam, The Alleged Religion of Peace® ( TARP™ )? Click this picture:

No, I am not exaggerating. Click the pic, go to "last," and read backwards.
If you are not informed about this stuff, you will be made sick. If you are informed, you will be made mad, all over again.

 
 

Miller Beer filters out photos of its own company-sponsored public indecency

October 5, 2007 08:08 PM by Michelle Malkin28 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

 
 

woodie4827 ?

I see that before going OT ( as GCP has such a charming way of doing, into watches & shooting & motorcycle racing… ) that some of the members here have already addressed the things ( the stealth bannings, the guilt by association, the slagging of people who can no longer defend themselves Over At That Place That Shall Evermore Remain Unmentioned, Unlinked, And Forgotten-- and so much more… ) that I would have raised…

...so I’ll just tell you this:

There’s nothing to “let go of...” it’s been released, already.

OATPTSERUUAF ( Over At That Place That Shall Evermore Remain Unmentioned, Unlinked, And Forgotten ) was once a place I admired, linked to, quoted, recommended people consider joining, and sent money to ( Where is my $20 back, Chuckles? ) but I simply won’t mention it, in the several places I am known, ever again.

Dust…
Shoes…
Shake off,
and move on…

All “Fooseballs” has done is drive off the better members and commentators, and it will not be the better, for doing so. I leave them to stew
In their own grease…

-30-
backhoe
THEG
( the heavy equipment guy )
Gating out
into cyberspace…

 'Lake of Fire' takes camera into abortion clinics

In the "Pity About Africa" department:

White Farmers Face Prison - For Growing Crops

October 6th, 2007

From the UK’s Telegraph:

Shoppers in an almost empty supermaket in Harare, August 2007.

White farmers in court for growing crops

By Peta Thornycroft, in Johannesburg

06/10/2007

Ten white farmers appeared in court in Zimbabwe yesterday accused of growing crops on their land — in a country where millions of people will need food aid within the next few months.

The case in Chegutu district, 70 miles southwest of Harare, exposes the perversity of President Robert Mugabe’s policies. Commerical agriculture was the mainstay of the economy in the days when Zimbabwe was a food exporter.

Since 2000, when the government began seizing white-owned farms, many of them violently, the agricultural sector has collapsed and the economy has gone into freefall, with inflation now at 6,600 per cent, the highest in the world.

The World Food Programme estimates that it will be feeding 4.1 million Zimbabweans, one third of the population, by the end of the year.

But none of that has stopped the Zanu-PF regime.

Now the Chegutu group is charged with violating the Consequential Provisions Act, which gave the few hundred remaining white farmers a final deadline of Sep 30 to leave their land and homes. The colonial-era Chegutu courtroom was packed by the so-called “war veterans” who are Mr Mugabe’s staunch supporters, and “beneficiaries” who stand to be given the properties should the 10 be convicted.

Among them are Edna Madzongwe, the speaker of parliament, and Nathan Shamuyarira, a former information minister and one of President Robert Mugabe’s closest aides.

The farmers, aged from 38 to 75, produce a variety of food from chickens to oranges and have already given two-thirds of their farms to the government for resettlement. All but one still work their remaining land intensively and say they intend to try to continue.

They were remanded on bail and their lawyer David Drury sought to have the case referred to the supreme court, which is due to rule on the constitutionality of the land law. They pleaded not guilty and face up to two years in prison if convicted…

Somehow all of the worst fear-mongering about the region seems to have come true.

And nobody seems to have notice. At least, nobody in our watchdog media.

1 Comment »
 
Name that party (phony soldier edition)

I believe that it's Glenn Reynolds who created the "name that party" series linking to MSM scandal stories burying the Democratic party affiliation of the involved officeholders. In today's installment, the AP reports "Atlantic City mayor drops out of sight." And he apparently took his party affiliation with him. As a bonus, this scandal also has an especially timely "phony soldier" component.

CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE: Glenn points out that Don Surber created "name that party."

Posted by Scott at 1:47 PM | Permalink 
 

Michael Ramirez on the Left's attack on Rush Limbaugh; click to enlarge:

Posted by John at 12:26 PM | Permalink 
 

Fundamentally Flawed ... con't part 3

SDA readers get a hold of some topics, and like a pack of hungry terriers just don't let go ... I love it.

Here then, is more fodder for the discussions found HERE and HERE:

Posted by Cjunk at 8:48 PM | Comments (18)

The vid I posted compares and contrasts wonderfully the two Western views ... they hate us because we stick our nose into their business; they hate us because their religion teaches them so.

Here's the longer version of the "they hate us because we stick our nose into their business" argument:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=AiiZT2ItpbQ

 

"What's left to say? If serious people see the Muslim issue as a "hang up", then we're foobarred. I guess they just can't conceive of a world where so many things we take for granted no longer exist. I suppose Roman citizens of 200 AD could not conceive of a world where Rome no longer existed. It had military might, it had technological advances, it had a history of defeating all comers...Three generations from now people are going to ask their grandparents: "What were you thinking? Didn't you see this coming? Why did you let it happen?"

EdS wrote:
backhoe wrote:
My long-lost first wife ...

Did you lose her, or did she lose herself?



Since I regard you as a good friend, I won't attempt levity or sarcasm:

Kaposi's hemorrhagic sarcoma- beat that...
Malignant melanoma- beat that, seemingly ( at a high Clark level 4, or low 5, you never know for certain )...

But that ruptured anuerism in the circlet of Willis
( that's the brain pan in English- heart, respiration, all other vital functions. In all that medical treatment, they never looked at her head. Not that it mattered- inoperable area )
on her 36th birthday, within a minute of the time she was born, well, that was what I call a "Slam the Big Door" ( from a title by John D. MacDonald ) moment-- that, was simply, that.

All the wiles and wit and wisdom and humor and loves and lusts condensed in one very fierce and fiery woman, caught in a singular point in time, and scattered into the winds. Into utter silence.

Sometimes, remembering these things still slices me to the core of soul, despite 25 years having past-- and sometimes, like now, 'tis just a sad memory.

In the course of that first marriage, the time between, and meeting someone who, in another time & place, would probably have been fast friend with wife #1, are a thousand stories. But like the Good Book says, "we will not speak of them here..."

And Real Life ( wife #2, old dog who needs to go out lots ) interrupts, so I lost my train of thought...

I wrote a little more about that time of my life here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1372897/posts?page=365#365

There is more, of course- far more- but the old dog is in my face again. Posted: 28 Nov 2006 06:48  

Ancient Boats Surface At Fla. Lake

Embracing Illegals--Companies are getting hooked on the buying power of undocumented immigrants--What they are hooked on is the cheap labor of illegal aliens. No SS taxes to match, no unemployment insurance to pay, no records to keep.

Mark Steyn: Political Pieties - PC immigration policies endanger western democracies

Blogger Discovers 'Media Matters' Using Clinton Admin Operatives as Official Agents


7,684 posted on 10/07/2007 3:27:44 AM PDT by backhoe (The 1990's? "The Decade of Fraud(s)...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Silent partner speaks out (Mrs. Jeri Thompson)
 
BLACKWATERGATE LINKED TO HILL
 
Are liberals victims of SHD?
 
Trough feeders and taxes in Mayor Miller's Toronto
 
Halifax Teen Girl Crime Wave Update: 6 more girls attacked
 
The protection racket we call government
 
What modern women want: a beta male
 
Cop Saves K-9 With "mouth to snout" CPR
 
VIDEO: Cat Herders (Yeehaw! Move 'em Li'l Kitties!!!)
 
The Facebook revolution (Biggest, most valuable database in the world?)
 
 

Just one artifact from "The Golden Era of Wee Jimmy"--

Not to mention Cubans in Angola and Yemen and Central America, 21% interest rates, and wearing sweaters inside to house so we wouldn't freeze...

18 posted on 10/10/2005

- we replaced this:

With the 180 million-buck wonder:


4 posted on 10/13/2005
 
 

... there is no road back folks-- in everyone's life, there is a line, of life, and death, that once you pass over, it can never be returned to.

Love or care for someone? Tell 'em. You won't pass this way ever again.

Got someone you hate? Let it go, walk away- it only poisons you.

Each and every day you can stand up on God's Good Earth, and walk and talk, you are one jump ahead of so many more who can't do it any more-- so keep moving.

"Something might be gaining on you..." Hattip: Satchel Page-


7,685 posted on 10/07/2007 7:08:09 AM PDT by backhoe (The 1990's? "The Decade of Fraud(s)...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7601 | View Replies]

To: All
"SUPREMACY:" SO I GUESS ALL THAT TALK ABOUT EQUALITY was just a sham.
 
Senator Calls Treaty a "Disaster" For America
 
Super Highways - A Reflection on the Great Plains International Conference--Although this conference was funded by taxpayers, it was a private conference to rally those who support of the NAFTA Superhighways.
 
US to Track Mexican Trucks with Satellite - Will It Matter?
 
Illegals may give state more clout - ... more seats in Congress
 
Study: illegal alien population may be as high as 38 million-- That would be 1 in 7.8 persons is an illegal alien.
 
Gun Lobby Splits on Improved Background Checks
 
Seattle man rides a trail that leads back to 1848
 
IEDs prove a different kind of warfare in Iraq
 

And, in other news ...

It takes an abject failure, or charlatan, to be at the center of a hoax not once but twice:

Did NASA scientist James Hansen, the global warming alarmist in chief, once believe we were headed for . . . an ice age? An old Washington Post story indicates he did.

On July 9, 1971, the Post published a story headlined "U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming." It told of a prediction by NASA and Columbia University scientist S.I. Rasool. The culprit: man's use of fossil fuels.

The Post reported that Rasool, writing in Science, argued that in "the next 50 years" fine dust that humans discharge into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuel will screen out so much of the sun's rays that the Earth's average temperature could fall by six degrees.

Sustained emissions over five to 10 years, Rasool claimed, "could be sufficient to trigger an ice age."

Aiding Rasool's research, the Post reported, was a "computer program developed by Dr. James Hansen," who was, according to his resume, a Columbia University research associate at the time.

When it comes to Hansen, following the money may explain a few things.

crossposted @ Celestial Junk

Posted by Cjunk at 11:24 AM | Comments (3)
 

Thompson Shakes Up Iowa

Fred Thompson's entry into the race just a month ago has already made a big impact in the key battleground state of Iowa. While Mitt Romney and his excellent organization has managed to maintain the lead among likely caucus-goers at 29%, Thompson has moved into second place with 18%, significantly ahead of Rudy Giuliani and Mike Huckabee (via Memeorandum):

Mitt Romney still leads in Iowa but Fred Thompson, a relative newcomer to the presidential race, has emerged as his nearest competitor in a new Des Moines Register poll of likely Republican caucus participants.

Mike Huckabee and Rudy Giuliani are in a close fight for third place in the Iowa Poll taken over three days last week. ...

Thompson, a former Tennessee senator who officially entered the race for the Republican nomination a month ago, grabs second place in the new poll at 18 percent. The poll was conducted while he was finishing his second campaign trip to Iowa last week.

Huckabee, a former Arkansas governor who demonstrated surprising strength in the Iowa Republican Party’s straw poll in August, has moved up in the pack by claiming the support of 12 percent of likely caucus participants.

It seems that Fred's decision to remain out of the race beyond the Ames poll didn't do all that much damage. While other candidates have practically pitched tents in Iowa, Thompson has only made two campaign visits to Iowa. They seem to have been highly effective. A second-place finish in Iowa would give Thompson a tremendous boost in credibility.

It could also send others packing. Mike Huckabee, after his surprise showing in the Ames poll, probably needs a third-place finish in Iowa in order to maintain any credibility. Rudy Giuliani will eventually start campaigning in Iowa again -- he's been gone since the summer -- and when he does, his numbers will rise, probably from Huckabee and Romney. John McCain has all but disappeared into the soup, scoring only 7%, three points above Ron Paul in the state and two above Tom Tancredo.

Thompson's rapid rise shows two important qualities about the race. First, voters have not settled on a favored candidate and appear willing to change horses. Second, those who have been in the race a while don't seem to be benefitting from that open-mindedness. If candidates like Tancredo, Hunter, Paul, and Brownback can't make the same kind of move that Thompson made in Iowa -- all candidates from around the center of the country -- then they need to reconsider their candidacies very soon. They need to acknowledge that they have gone nowhere and represent a waste of effort and focus.

--"Maybe it is time we elected a President who merely sets the tone instead of trying to elect a President who promises to solve all of our problems? Seems we have had a couple decades of that sort of thing and it hasn't really accomplished much save for making too large a segment of the population come to view the president as Einstein, the Easter Bunny, Santa Claus and the Wizard of Oz all rolled into one, and then end up blaming the President for all their own failures of choice and life decisions."
 
Reviving Tesla's Wireless Power Initiatives
 
ORIN KERR CORRECTS A CLUELESS FRANK RICH. (Via Ann Althouse, who has further thoughts, and corrections: "Did Rich even read the book?" Why bother, when he already knew what he was supposed to write about it?)
 
Virginian Pilot on "Duke Non-Rape" Case: It's All "Their" Fault!--This is how the MSM covers their behind: they blame their enemies.
 
The president vs. the kids [Tammy Baldwin-10 million children abandoned]--These liberals get away with this because Bush doesn’t have the stones to shoot down the liberal lies with facts. All he has to do is hold a press conference and explain why he vetoed the bill. The bill provided benefits for “kids” who were in their 20s, illegals, and families that qualified even if they made $80,000 a year.
 
BUM RUSH--HOW THE DEMS PLAN TO TAKE DOWN THEIR REAL OPPONENTS:RUSH AND O’REILLY--Fred Thompson is about the only Republican who goes after the Left, the Thompson video responding to Mike Moore is one example, and Fred's recent support of Rush and his mentioning of the left ( even in the Senate ) as the " Looney Left ".
That is one reason we ( most of the conservative base ) is in support of Fred, he tell's it like it is, straight talker, and show's he has some stones to go after the MSM and the Left.
 
 
Credit Crunch – The New Diet Snack for Financial Markets (A MUST READ)
 
 
 

7,686 posted on 10/07/2007 3:01:45 PM PDT by backhoe (The 1990's? "The Decade of Fraud(s)...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
And Now You Know . . . [Dan Collins]

the rest of the story!  Why in the world do these people need SCHIP? And how does a $45,000 a year reported income manage to send two kids at once to a $20,000 a year private school? This is a blatant fraud by the Democrats and easily checked.

Private School and A Large House, But No Health Insurance? : The American Pundit  "A half-a-million dollar home, $190,000 in commercial property, successful architect grandfathers, owning his own design company, a beautiful kitchen complete with what appears to be granite counter tops, an estimated $1,200 a month mortgage, personal injury auto insurance required in Maryland, but the Frosts couldn’t afford an estimated $452? Hmm."

Flopping Aces: "This is the family the Democrats chose to represent SCHIP?  If there was a more perfect family why SCHIP should not be expanded its this one."

SCHIP--Limbaugh, Hannity and Hewett will bash the Dems nicely with this most recent gifty stick.  Is there ONE non-phony within the Dem collective?

Little Graham Frost of Baltimore addressed the nation this week as the Democratic spokesperson, pleading against President Bush’s promise to veto legislation that would expand S-CHIP health coverage for children.  It has been a long road for Graham, aged 12, who was seriously injured in a traffic accident while on his bike.  According to his mom, it would cost the family about $1200 per month for private insurance, if not for the government program, while the family takes in only about $45,000 a year.  In an article in the Baltimore Sun, Graham’s father is characterized as a common woodworker.  That is, until a blogger, calling himself

“icwhatudo” at Free Republic, however, showed rather more curiosity than the professional reporter paid to investigate the story and did a bit of Googling. Mr Frost, the “woodworker”, owns his own design company and the commercial property it operates from, part of which space he also rents out; they have a 3,000-sq-ft home on a street where a 2,000-sq-ft home recently sold for half a million dollars; he was able to afford to send two children simultaneously to a $20,000-a-year private school; his father and grandfather were successful New York designers and architects; etc. This is apparently the new definition of “working families”.

Powerline: "Why is it that the chance of any mainstream media reporter doing easy internet research to check the accuracy of the Democrats' story, as this Freeper did, is exactly zero?"

I’m glad little Graham and his family were able to get help, and I hope he reaches full rehabilitation.  But perhaps the Democrats ought to take more care in the spokespeople they choose, if they wish to tug at our heartstrings.

Blue Crab Boulevard has the roundup.

 
PORKBUSTERS UPDATE: So much for open government. "Things get heated as Sharyl Attkisson tracks down Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones, D-Ohio, to question her about a $2 million earmark benefiting paint company Sherwin Williams." Ouch. How dare you question our political masters about their jobs!
 
A skeptical environmentalist looks at global warming Permalink 

Bjorn Lomborg is the author of Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming. Though I haven't read the book, I'm familiar with some of Lomberg's shorter pieces, which have always struck me as the most sensible writings I've seen on the subject of global warming.

In an article for today's Washington Post, Lomborg makes the case against (a) the alarmist view of global warming and (b) the left's program for dealing with the problem

 
INTERPOL PEDOPHILE ASSASSINATION TEAMS
 
The Death of Johannesburg --South Africa didn’t turn into a multi-racial paradise. It hasn’t yet gone the way of Zimbabwe, but there are ominous signs that it is heading in that direction.
 
Desmarais under fire for Burma connections - TotalElfFina
 
Get the boots out, Eddie
 
The Dragon Flies'Lair~XXXXIII
 
FReeper Canteen ~ Hall of the Heroes: Nancy Wake ~ Oct. 8, 2007
 
Nuclear Power Primed for Comeback
 
Researchers Explain Why Having Baby Reduces Breast Cancer Chances--Time magazine has a cover story this week about how breast cancer is spreading all over the world. They give various weak explanations but don’t ever mention that the spread of breast cancer over the world exactly mirrors the spread of Govt. or NGO funded abortions. The two phenomena mirror each other exactly.
 
 
 
US National Life Chain Sunday 2007 - October 7 - Life Chain's 20th Year
 

Islam is Peace /not

Listen and learn from this short video from Robert Spencer.  | | Comments (2)

BlogWarZ, chapter ???

Pot! Kettle Calling!-- Chuckette bans people for simply searching our nics and she has the nadsovaries to call out someone who does exactly the same thing! "...the problem w/ the stealth bannings.  No one knows who’s gone and why.  And there’s no way to refute the lies.  The more fallout I see from this the less and less I like it."

Al Qaeda and Haditha bombshell: What the MSM didn’t tell you

October 7, 2007 11:22 PM by Michelle Malkin7 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

 
(Backpeddling Mayor) Newsom Welcomes The Fleet With Fierce Defense Of San Francisco As Pro-Military--Mayor Newsom's constituents agree that "the extreme right" has San Fransicko all wrong.

 
 
 
It's showtime, folks

Fred Thompson may not have impressed certain "inside-the-beltway" pundits in the run-up to his entry into the presidential race, but so far he seems to be doing fairly well among Republican voters. The latest Rasmussen survey has him in a statistical dead-heat with Rudy Giuliani. And a Des Moines Register poll has Thompson running a respectable second to Mitt Romney in Iowa (29 percent to 18 percent). A month and a half ago it looked like Romney might lap the field in that state, where he's focused so heavily.

Thompson's popularity shouldn't be too surprising. Of the four leading contenders, he's the one who can deliver the most consistently conservative message with the fewest contradictions of past positions.

Thompson's solid showing in the polls adds an element of interest to this week's debate among Republican candidates to be held on Tuesday in Dearborn, Michigan. It will mark Thompson's first appearance in such a debate.

Many observers believe that Thompson delayed his entry into the campaign in order to make sure he'd be ready to perform well at events like debates. Thus, it's natural to view Tuesday's debate as Thompson's opportunity to prove he's ready for prime time. That's fair enough, as long as one keeps in mind that the people he needs to prove this to are Republican voters, not beltway insiders.

To comment on this post, go here.

Posted by Paul at 6:59 PM | Permalink 
 
"Fred will never be able to please the Beltway crowd, regardless of his performance on Tuesday. George Will hates him and Dick Morris loathes him. Fred threatens their paychecks because he shows them to be arrogant elitists, feeding at the MSM trough .... basically faux conservatives."
 

Thompson's rapid rise shows two important qualities about the race. First, voters have not settled on a favored candidate and appear willing to change horses. Second, those who have been in the race a while don't seem to be benefitting from that open-mindedness. If candidates like Tancredo, Hunter, Paul, and Brownback can't make the same kind of move that Thompson made in Iowa -- all candidates from around the center of the country -- then they need to reconsider their candidacies very soon. They need to acknowledge that they have gone nowhere and represent a waste of effort and focus.


7,687 posted on 10/08/2007 2:54:35 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an Old Keyboard Cowboy, Ridin' the Trakball into the Dawn of Information)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Go on over to The Jawa Report: The Jawa Report - Bluto: Report: Haditha 'Massacre' Planned by al Qaeda
 

October 07, 2007

Report: Haditha 'Massacre' Planned by al Qaeda

Defend Our Marines has discovered a declassified intelligence summary detailing how al Qaeda operatives planned and executed the Haditha "massacre" in order to discredit US/Coalition forces:

October 6, 2007 – Buried in the mountain of exhibits attached to the once secret Haditha, Iraq murder inquiry prepared by US Army Maj. Gen. Eldon A. Bargewell is an obscure Marine Corps intelligence summary (see pdf) that says the deadly encounter was an intentional propaganda ploy planned and paid for by Al Qaeda foreign fighters.
The report is based on information from terrorist-insurgents captured following the Haditha incident.

Here's a PDF of the report, which the press couldn't be bothered to include in their "analysis" of events.

Thanks to larwyn.


By Bluto at October 7, 2007 05:54 PM | |
 
 

Law of the Sea : Reagan's Men Weigh in on Bush's Latest Dumb Idea

Over at Opinion Journal, William P. Clark and Edwin Meese set the record straight on Ronald Reagan and the Law of the Sea Treaty:

Ronald Reagan actually opposed LOST even before he came to office. He was troubled by a treaty that had, in the course of its protracted negotiations, mutated beyond recognition from an effort to codify certain navigation rights strongly supported by our Navy into a dramatic step toward world government. This supranational agenda was most closely identified with, but not limited to, the Treaty's Part XI, which created a variety of executive, legislative and judicial mechanisms to control the resources of the world's oceans.

In a radio address titled "Ocean Mining" on Oct. 10, 1978, Mr. Reagan applauded the idea that "no nat[ional] interest of ours could justify handing sovereign control of two-thirds of the earth's surface over to the Third World." He added, "No one has ruled out the idea of a [Law of the Sea] treaty--one which makes sense--but after long years of fruitless negotiating, it became apparent that the underdeveloped nations who now control the General Assembly were looking for a free ride at our expense--again."

By Ragnar Danneskjold, Unrepentant Whore at 07:48 AM |
 
 
Islam is Peace for Britain?(Barf)
 
Rush Week
 
Disgraced Sandy Berger joins Hillary Clinton campaign
 
Media Matters: We’re Not Political
 
Hillary Supporters Steered $6 Million to Media Matters!--The other story I hope Rush hits on today is the family the democrats used to promote the State Children's Health Insurance Program. The family reported salary around 80K, owned several businesses & rental property and paid $20,000 per year for private schools for their two kids. Yet, they want me and you to pay their kids health insurance.
 
PUBLIC PAYS FOR UPPER CLASS' PRIVATE ED. (NYC elite disability scammers?)
 
Getting the last laugh --For more than you ever wished to know about The Lady MacBeth of Little Rock, click the picture:

Hillary Clinton- archives, comments, and opposition research:

AN ESSENTIAL STEP IN SAVING AMERICA

Ruh-rho!

Poll: Spanish Spoken Here--and Two-thirds Don't Mind

The American Dream in Reverse--And let’s not forget, also, that the friendly IRS sees any debt that you have written off under foreclosure as “INCOME” on which you have to pay taxes.

Tapping tidal energy: the wave of the future


7,688 posted on 10/08/2007 7:37:41 AM PDT by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Another U.N. Power Grab
 
Henry Waxman to Investigate Talk Radio
 
New immigration riots in "peaceful" Switzerland EURABIA ALERT
 
Believe Hillary’s Promises? You Can’t Fix Stupid
 
 
SCHIP = Socialist HillaryCare
 
Will Sandy Burgler Advise Hillary How To Lie, Cheat & Steal, Or Is He Being Kept On A Short Leash?
 
Longest Continuous Texas Hold-em Game: Clintons And The Media
 
 
The left cares about nothing but its own perpetuation--They will pimp children to demagogue issues, as in this photo. They will pimp other children and LIE about who they are, as they did when they said that the child who gave the radio address on the S-CHIP issue was from a poor family. Just using the child at all is a disgusting display of shameless pandering, but as this intrepid Freeper has pointed out, the child isn't even exactly who they said he was. The MSM never even questioned the claims, of course. Why would they bother---their aims are indistinguishable from the Dems' aims. Mark Steyn has more. Glad he can keep his sense of humor; personally, I am just disgusted. (HT: Powerline)
 
TV-"The Office" and "Pushing Up Daisies" Review
 
Doc, what’s up with snooping? Pediatrician paranoia runs deep
 
Following Honeybee Disappearance, Bumblebees Begin Vanishing Act
 
Lady luck turns on Las Vegas' once-hot home market --Folks, we’re in fairly uncharted territory here. Don’t be sucked in by the real estate agent pep talks.
 
Same-sex marriage backers go to TV - New ads ask viewers to 'open hearts and minds' on the issue.--They won’t be satisfied with civil unions. They view them as insulting, not the whole enchilata, so civil unions will be used to secure gay marriage. Once they get gay marriage, that will be used to secure other legal/political/social goals...
Happiness lies within, and these folks don’t understand that. Everybody else has to change for them; don’t ask them to change. If you ask that of them, then you’re a racist and a bigot, etc., etc.

7,689 posted on 10/08/2007 11:31:10 AM PDT by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The Cowboy Way:
 
http://networdblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/tough-guys.html
 
The code these men lived by is still a wise pattern for today's man to consider. The cowboy was often rough and crude, he slept in the mud and whooped it up in town, spending his money in a weekend of drunken pleasures, then was on the road again for months of hard, hard labor. The thing is, despite the boyish actions of the cowboys, despite civilization's softening effect, the Cowboy Way is still applicable today for men to consider.

THE CODE OF THE WEST
The exact code, having never been written down and turned into law, is nebulous, it varies based on who you talk to, what they remember, and how they personally live. There are many shared concepts, though, and here are a few with how they can be applied today by any boy or man.

1. Don't inquire into a man's past.
In the old West, men could be from any background, good or bad, but when they came to the frontier, they were starting over. A man had to make his own way and he may be bad all through, but he may be someone who made mistakes and is trying to get past them. Cowboys didn't inquire too deeply into a man's past, nor his name. If he shared a name, that's what you called him - didn't matter if it was real or not. That's what he was now.

This is a principle that we can use today: someone should be judged by who they are now and what they do, not what they did before. This doesn't erase justice, a man must pay for his wrong, but if he's done his time, he starts over. If a man works hard and does what's right, his deeds of the past don't matter any more. Conversely, just because someone was wonderful once and did great deeds before doesn't mean he is today: prove yourself again, take up your burden every day and show what kind of man you are.

*UPDATE: commenter Viktor Silo points out that a man's past defines who he is now; this is true, but the principle is not that the past doesn't matter, but that what a man does now is what is most critical. For the old west, when some guy rode into camp unknown, you didn't ask about his past, you responded to what they were right now. And that's how we should be today: if you don't know someone's past, then you should treat them based on who they are now, not what you figure or think or hope.

2. Never steal another man's horse. A horse thief pays with his life.
For people who don't understand the old west, the protection of horses and killing of horse thieves seems excessive. What you have to understand is that Montana is 2000 miles from Texas. California is 2000 miles from the Mississippi river. You didn't go a few blocks to the store, you rode a few days to the nearest town. A cowboy afoot was in danger from the weather, from hostile tribes such as the Cheyenne and the Blackfoot. He was slow and used up resources faster, spent more time in the elements than he had to. A horse meant life and death. Stealing a man's horse and putting him afoot was a very serious thing.

Today this can be thought of in a more general sense. Obviously nobody should steal from another person - it's not just illegal, it's essentially immoral. Yet theft goes beyond the mere taking of objects that don't belong to you. A real man understands the labor that goes into a job, and doesn't steal that either: pay your employees what they are worth, give them a fair wage for their job. And an employee knows that his time and effort are paid for, and it would be stealing from the boss to not work. Giving less than you can, taking off extra time just for fun, slacking off at the job, all of that is stealing as well. The Book says a workman is worthy of his hire, but that goes two ways. It's theft to slight someone on a purchase, or to give less than what someone paid for. A real man looks out for others around him, even if it costs him personally less than he could have made by being a "better" businessman.

Even further, not stealing a man's horse means not taking away what a man needs to survive. You should never be the one that ruins a man's livelihood or life. Respect and concern for your fellow man should prompt someone to protect their ability to survive, as long as what they are doing isn't unjust or wrong. Stopping someone from selling Angel Dust to middle school kids is one thing, but stopping a man from selling shoes because it hurts your business is another.

3. Defend yourself whenever necessary.

In the old West there wasn't the network of law and order we take for granted. You couldn't appeal to the local police, expect a fair trial, get a local judge, or have any reasonable expectation of protection. A man had to fight for himself, or no one would. The gun battles of the old West were often wrong but sometimes a mere manner of self defense, there wasn't any law but your own right hand and the pistol at your side.

In a world where we have laws, even international laws, that involve police that move across borders and extradition treaties, the severe need for self defense is not as strong as it once was. We can reasonably rely on justice to reach us, the law or at least fear of the law to protect us. But this isn't always so. The day may come, God forbid, that you'll face danger without anyone else there to protect you. That day is the day you must be ready and able to defend yourself. That means being familiar with and ready to use a weapon or self defense, and that includes guns to this day. Taking away weapons is the first act a tyrant does to ensure his victims cannot fight back.

4. Never shoot an unarmed or unwarned enemy.
Sometimes known as the "rattlesnake code" like the rattlesnake who lets her rattle fly before striking. In a place without law, this code drew a line between murder and self defense. If both sides clearly knew what was coming, it was less likely one or the other was just ambushing someone to slaughter them. There were exceptions, of course. If someone was coming after you with the clear intent to kill, if they stalked you or tried repeatedly to kill you then came at you again, you were free to defend yourself. But the second lowest form of villain was the dry gulcher; the man who'd lay in wait and just assassinate their target from cover, without any chance for a fight.

The tough guy today keeps this in mind. He's not a hair trigger maniac, he'll always give his enemy a chance to back down, to know that this has gone too far. Lawyers suggest if you're going to get into a fight to hold up your hands open and facing the foe and say very loudly "I don't want to fight you." This serves two purposes, first it gives one last chance to avoid a fight. Second, and most important to the lawyer, it establishes your attempt with many witnesses to not get into the altercation, useful later for criminal charges and lawsuits. This is much like the old code of waiting until your opponent went for his gun before shooting, it was at least technical protection of self defense. Yet beyond this crass and legalistic interpretation, there's a principle for men. Don't be the guy who starts a fight, don't be the one who throws the first punch. A tough guy doesn't have to prove he's all bad, he can let his life and behavior demonstrate it by how he reacts, not how he acts. If you defend yourself, you're in the right. If you attack, then you need good reason - justice, or defending others, for instance.

*UPDATE: Wartime presumes warning. You don't need to let an enemy at war know you're there - he knows, or he wouldn't be at war.

5. Look out for your own.
This again relates to the lack of organized law in the old west: you'd have to defend your own because there wasn't an officer nearby to do it for you.

The tough guy protects his family and friends, his co workers, those related to him in some way. If each man looks out for his people, not only do they not have to defend themselves (such as children and women), but each knows that the other is defended and treats them with greater respect and dignity. Defense doesn't mean flying across the table and attacking, it can be merely pointing out an error, checking sums to see if the price is right, watching for trouble before it starts, teaching to do what is right to each member of the community. "Your own" spreads out like ripples in a pond, with each successive ripple related and enclosing the previous one. You have the initial splash of yourself and immediate loved ones, then close relatives, then friends, then acquaintances and co workers, then the neighborhood, then the town, the county, the state, the country, the continent, the planet. Your immediate responsibility lessens each ring that expands outward, as other men are covering those groups more closely, but you still are responsible to all of them. That man may not be your family, but he's a fellow member of your community. That foreign feller might not speak your language, but he's a fellow human being at the very least. Look out for them all, because responsibility knows no national boundaries or ethnic group.

6. A cowboy always helps someone in need, even a stranger or an enemy.
That man might be your enemy, but he's still a fellow man, and when he's in need, its time to set aside differences and give him a hand. That doesn't mean you stop fighting the enemy because they're losing, it doesn't mean you help a guy up you've knocked down for trying to rape your sister. It means when someone is in genuine need and you have the ability to help, you do so. Sure, you had to plug that varmint for trying to steal your saddle, but he's bleeding now, and you can bind up the wound before you take him to prison. That guy might be a rotten jerk who constantly picks on you, but when he needs help to learn to read, you can give him a hand.

You do this not because you'll win them over, not because they'll show gratitude, and not because there's some reward. You do this because it's right to do. Because it shows you're a better man, and because you owe a debt of responsibility to your own - and even your enemy is your own at some point in the ripples on the pond.

The way you react is based on need. Not what that person thinks is their need - the junkie needing another fix, the prisoner needing to escape - but actual need, real lack. Even the most rotten bastard on earth has need sometime, and that's when a real man reaches out.

*UPDATE: To clarify, if you're in a battle, you'd better be doing what is right or quit right now. But you don't stop to help your enemy because he's in need, the entire point of a battle is to put him in need. This is dealing with when you aren't engaged with the enemy. Prisoners, captives, people not in combat who you come across. Sure, this guy might hate you and be your bitter enemy, but if he's bleeding to death when you're passing by one day or starving and at your door, lend him a hand, even if he is your enemy.

7. Remove your guns before sitting at the dining table.
Wearing a gun was like wearing a belt for the cowboy. He didn't wear it to be ready to kill his fellow man, he wore it as a tool, it was needed for snakes, cougars, bears, hostile Indians, rustlers, any number of problems. To go without left one defenseless and vulnerable, to wear a gun was a simple matter of being ready for the job. Yet there were places a man went without a gun because he didn't need it there, and it was rude and wrong to go heeled. This particularly applied to the dinner table, especially if women were present. Keep the gun nearby and handy for an emergency, but you didn't need it while eating in polite company. At camp, sitting in the dirt with a plate of beans and biscuits is a different story.

The cowboy was a pretty rough character - and still is. Men tend to degrade when around each other for long periods of time (which is, I believe, part of why the code came about, to counter this tendency). Without the softening and civilizing influence of women, men get dirtier, rougher, cruder, and more wild. Women can overdo this influence, which is the subject for another essay, but men definitely overdo their masculinity when set apart. Swearing is just one symptom of this, it's the expression of someone frustrated and lacking vocabulary and sophistication to deal with the problem at hand. My mother always called it the result of a "bankrupt vocabulary" - its the easy way out, you don't have to think, you just fire off a word.

Yet the cowboy always understands that there are times and places he needs to restrain that tendency, to clean up inside and out. Cuss around horses, cows, and men, but not around women and kids, was the rule. You changed your behavior based on where you were and what you were doing - and especially who else was there.

Today, this extends to basic courtesy and manners. Each situation has its own unique set of manners. What makes sense in church doesn't necessarily on the job 200 feet up on a steel girder, or out on a hunt. When you're in a polite situation, dealing with gentle folk, then have a gentle demeanor, treat them and what they believe and expect with the respect you'd want. Be ready for each situation to approach it appropriately, rather than forcing your version of life on every single situation in a crude, brainless manner. Know when to be polite and when not to. Know how to behave with a lady and a lout.

8. Honesty is absolute - your word is your bond, a handshake is more binding than a contract.
There were no lawyers to draw up contracts, many men didn't even know how to read or write. There was no law to make sure you did what you said, many times there weren't even any men around to witness the agreement. All that any man had was his word, and either you kept it, or you were known as a low down, lyin' snake, at best. Word spread around camp to camp, and you were ruined. Friendless, jobless, aimless. You'd proved you were worthless and not to be trusted - until you could build up a new reputation somewhere they hadn't heard of you (see 1, above).

A real man, a tough guy, has integrity. His word is reliable, he will, insofar as he is capable of doing so in this life, keep promises he's made. He will remember what he's said and live up to it, he will not go back on an agreement, no matter how much it hurts him. In the process, he learns to make no promises he can't be reasonably sure to keep, he will avoid agreements he can't expect to honor. Integrity is a life, not an action, it defines you as a person. Be trustworthy and honorable, be reliable in even the smallest things, and you'll be a man. Fail to and you're nothing.

9. Don't make a threat without expecting dire consequences.
Threats are not idle, particularly in a place where every man carried a deadly weapon. Related to the above code, if you said something, you'd either best back it up or your word is useless. And the above shows what a man without his word is worth.

This extends to modern life in several ways. The most egregious and troubling failure of this code is in parents who threaten one thing and never follow through. Children learn quickly that a parent's word is worthless and their punishments are not to be feared. They will immediately take advantage of this to feed their immature desires and unformed ethical decisions. Parents must follow through on threats - and must threaten only what they can and ought to follow through on. Threatening to cave your kid's head in is not only unlikely but horrid. Threatening to make them do without toys if they won't put them away is proper and good.

Yet even those without children need to follow this code. A promise and a threat are two sides of the same coin, and a man of integrity is hesitant to give either but unswerving in carrying either out. Be it at work or in play, in dealing with strangers or family, integrity demands that you do what you have said. Be very cautious to issue a threat, knowing the burden it carries.

10. Never pass anyone on the trail without saying "Howdy".
A man could ride for weeks without seeing another soul, and just a friendly hello was enough to help with that loneliness and isolation. It served a greater purpose, however. It demonstrated that you were friendly and not possibly hostile. It showed you were alive and healthy, rather than in need. That simple greeting was a significant statement.

Today, simple politeness goes a long ways. Even strangers are people you should be polite to. Whether they respond in kind, or at all, is their problem, not yours. Always be the one who smiles, nods, shakes the hand, acknowledges the other person's presence. Without this simple part of life, we become more and more isolated, more cut off and separated from each other and the community erodes in the process. It's harder to be mean or to maltreat someone you've been polite to - and that can be the tiny thing that makes the difference. Being polite shows a minimum of concern about the other person. It demonstrates you care whether they live or die, at least a little.

But remember the two codes above: don't say it if you don't mean it. Don't ask how someone is just out of habit, ask because you want to know.

11. Do not practice ingratitude.
This is one of those universal rules that applies in all places to all people. In the West, the man who has little but his clothes, horse, and tack has every reason to be grateful for everything he gets, no matter how small. That meal might be horrible, but at least you didn't have to cook it. That hat might be ugly, but they gave you something.

Ingratitude is the mark of a small person with a big ego. Small because they are overly concerned over meaningless things, and big because they think they are worth more than they were given. An overinflated vision of one's self might delude me into thinking that I should have better than the gift I'm given, when a realistic vision understands I deserve nothing, and a gift by definition is extra, a special gesture beyond what I'm worth. Ingratitude shows a man is mean and petty.

12. A cowboy is pleasant even when out of sorts.
Related to 11 above is the mood. When faced with hardship every day, the last thing anyone wanted to hear was whining. It was rough enough sleeping on hard ground and working in thunderstorms with fickle and contrary cow critters without having the guy next to you complaining about it all the time.

When life gives you lemons, suck it up and do your job. Complaining can show weakness of spirit, it demonstrates that you believe you ought to have things better, that you're being mistreated. Even if you are being mistreated, complaining won't fix that, and it makes everyone else in the same situation even more miserable. A tough guy, a real leader looks for ways to make the situation better. He takes charge, he takes action, and he does what has to be done. If the situation can't be changed, he gets the job done as soon as possible so it can get over with. It's one thing to complain where appropriate: "guys, I broke my leg." It's another to complain just because you are unhappy: "I hate my job, don't you hate this job, this place sucks, let me count the ways."

13. Complain about the cooking and you become the cook.
Cooking was actually one of the hardest jobs on the trail. Feeding dozens if not scores of hungry men every day with just what you can pack on a wagon was a chore, one that took hours. There wasn't ready food, you had to pack and find fuel for the fires. You didn't have special utensils, you had a few pots and pans. You got paid better, but you worked for it. And if someone complained, well let them try it a while.

Related to 12 above, if you can't do it better, keep your yap shut. It's one thing to be usefully critical about something, it's another to just complain, particularly in an ungrateful manner. Sure, you hate beets but you didn't have to cook them, either and someone put in the effort. Gag em down or don't but keep your mouth and your expression shut. Generally speaking you'll notice that someone who has done a hard job is significantly less likely to whine about the quality of that work than someone who has not. I welcome criticism about my work, I know that despite my efforts the grammar I use is sometimes tortured and I make errors. I need to know that to do a better job. At the same time, I don't welcome just pointless attacks and whining. Don't care for how a blogger deleted your comment or won't post on something?

Make your own blog.

14. Always be courageous.
Every man relied on his fellow in danger or trouble to be there at his side, facing danger. It helped each other man be strong, and it protected them. A coward or someone who cringed at danger at your side meant that side wasn't protected. If you're under attack by bandits, you can't afford to have one man not giving his all.

Courage means more than fighting in a time of danger. Allow me to quote myself from
Considering Virtues:
Courage is not fearlessness, it is the ability to function and do what is right even while one is afraid. Fear does not indicate a lack of courage - failing to act properly out of fear does. My favorite example of courage is in To Kill a Mockingbird. Scout considers her father Atticus Finch to be the height of courage because he alone in the town stood up to a rabid dog and shot him in the streets. This did take a sort of courage, but Atticus wanted Scout to understand this virtue better.

He had Scout spend the whole summer reading to and spending time with an old woman who was dying. The old woman smelled funny, was boring and confused, drooled and was in general someone no child would want to spend time with. But Scout spent time each day the whole summer with this woman until she died. Courage is doing what is right even if you personally do not want to - it is related to fortitude in this way.

A lack of courage leads one to take the easiest path, to avoid things one does not prefer to do, and to show intemperance in life. Cowardly behavior leads one to avoid virtue because those around may mock or belittle you. Courage requires one to do what is right, even if the world says one is wrong. Courage requires one to do what is right and be ready to pay the price - because there almost always is one.
A courageous man faces what he has without shirking and without turning back. This might be changing a diaper, it might be yet another day on the job when he feels he just can't stand it one more day, it might be swallowing his pride and admitting he's wrong, it might be facing the enemy even though it means sacrifice and a hard, long battle. But a tough guy has courage, the kind of courage that is shown by his behavior and not his attitude or his aggressiveness.

17. Never try on another man's hat.
This one sounds kind of funny, but it actually is pretty significant. It relates to horse theivin' in number 2. This is simple respect for the property of others. If you treat people with respect and dignity, you will do so with what they own, no matter how trivial or stupid it seems to you. Sure, I can't stand those little pillows women seem compelled to pile up on couches. But they like them, and they belong to the women, so you treat them with respect. Sure, I think disco is horrible, but someone might like it, so I shouldn't play frisbee with his Saturday Night Fever disc. If you borrow something, return it in at least the same quality as you got it - or replace it. If you use someone's car, bring it back with gas in the tank. Treat people's goods like you'd treat your own, or at least how you'd rather they did.

16. No matter how weary and hungry you are after a long day in the saddle, always tend to your horse's needs before your own, and get your horse some feed before you eat.
What's that you say? You don't treat your own stuff with respect, either? Well a real man does. He knows that what he has represents him, and if his stuff looks shabby, he reveals himself to be a shabby man. He doesn't have to look pretty, his stuff doesn't have to be the latest, most fashionable, or best. It just has to be cared for and tended, properly treated. What you own is what you use, and if you don't take care of it, you won't use it long. That means cleaning and maintaining, it means putting it away carefully and using without dirtying. This can start right here, while you read. Have you checked your computer for viruses? Spyware? Do you have files on it you don't need? Are they scattered all over and hard to find? How long has it been since you defragmented your drives? Is the keyboard covered with cat hair and cheeto crumbs? Is the mouse sticking because it's never cleaned?

The attitude you have for your own goods should extend to other peoples' as well, and I'm just terrible at this one. My room looks like a bomb went off, I hang up clothes sometimes, sometimes they are in piles I remember. I don't wash my sheets enough, I rarely make my bed. I'm not a slob, but I'm no exemplar of this code, either. A cowboy knew that everything he had was from the Man upstairs, who owes him nothing. It's ungracious to treat what you have in this manner.

17. Real cowboys are modest.
This more than most of the codes separates the real from the fake tough guy. The fake tough guy feels the compulsion to ooze toughness and show it to the world at every single opportunity. They do so often by telling everyone how bad they are, how dangerous they are, how strong they are, how many guys they've beat up, how many people fear them. Put on any rap CD and chances are you'll hear at least one song that is full of this phony bravado. You're a minstrel, not a soldier, we like to hear you entertain us, but keep the self aggrandizement down to a dull roar.

A real tough guy doesn't talk about his accomplishments, he may even downplay them if he truly understands their relative worth. Sure, he might be a terrific linguist, but really does that compare to delivering babies? Yeah, he might have an unbelievable ability to cook, but really what does that matter? When the situation comes up, he does the work competently and the best he can, and does not need praise or recognition - the job its self is enough. A real tough guy is known for being what a fake tough guy needs to convince others he is.

18. Never shoot a woman nor mistreat her no matter what.
Sure, some women deserved shootin', although they were rare. Some women are every bit as low down and evil as men, and they should face justice. But the cowboy had a unique perspective: women were rare and special. You could go years without seeing a female face, and it was even more rare she wasn't married off. Mistreating a woman was grounds for every man within a mile descending on you. Even women who really were obnoxious or awful were treated with more respect because of their femininity.

Today's constant effort to treat women and men as functionally equivalent and interchangeable has not removed this tendency in the west. Women are still treated better than men by most men, a feature that women in other countries often find very appealing in American men. The tough guy treats women as weaker and more fragile than he is, and not just because most of them are. The tough guy is establishing a pattern of behavior for himself so that he reflexively and naturally responds this way in every situation. He's teaching other men and boys how to treat a woman. He's showing women that they are different and ought to behave differently. The results to society can be profound.

Women are, as I said above, a civilizing influence to men, but that has to be nurtured as well. It tends to come naturally, but if it's ground into the dirt by encouraging women to be every bit as crude and brutish as men, and men to treat women as no different than men, then that civilizing influence is stifled, even destroyed. Society flourishes by having both the strengths of men and the strengths of women to build and maintain it. Eliminating one or the other weakens the whole.

19. Respect the land.
Sportsmen, outdoorsmen, hunters, fishers, hikers, and cowboys are among the world's foremost conservationists. They live in and enjoy and among the wild and their scenery in a way that people who live in cities can only imagine. The beauty and the majesty of the outdoors is a real and every day feature of their life, not a sometime event for vacation or a special event. They live off the land in many cases, and more than most want it protected and not raped. The man who started the National Park system, who popularized the stuffed animal bear as a toy - the Teddy Bear - was Teddy Roosevelt, a hunter and sportsman famous for his exploits with a rifle. The railroad men, for all their faults, were so overwhelmed by the spectacular sights they met in driving rail across America that they were among the strongest supporters of protecting these lands.

The real man knows and understands his environment is where he lives, and he cares for it in the way he cares for the stuff he has. A tough guy knows how to survive and deal with his environment - be it city, wilderness, or ocean, and does so with respect for it. He wants to care for this not because he wants it pristine and untouched, but so that he can return to it to use it for his needs and for others to enjoy and use it. If it's all used up, nobody gets to it any more. The preservationist wants everything to stay exactly how it is - climate and stone, animal and tree - and the conservationist wants it to be protected and used.
 
Gerard said...

Nice. Much more thoughtful and insightful than my send up at:

http://americandigest.org/mt-archives/006775.php


7,690 posted on 10/08/2007 12:40:28 PM PDT by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
 Letter: Rush Limbaugh / Phony Soldiers...
 
Democrats take Rush out of context [ 1 ... 10, 11, 12 ]
 
And this threat, to our sister site, still festers:
 
Richard Warman attacks free speech, Free Dominion BREAKING [ 1 ... 30, 31, 32 ]
 
A Divided Jerusalem? The Nightmare ILLUSTRATED
 
 Wishing Everyone at FD a Happy Thanksgiving [ 1 ... 3, 4, 5 ]

7,691 posted on 10/08/2007 1:32:40 PM PDT by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Why Democrats Must Lie To Win (Rush Mentions Free Republic Alert)
 
Media Fail at Fact Checking on 12 Year Old Voice of SCHIP; Blogs(Free Republic) Pick Up Slack
SCHIP & the Tobacco Tax
 
Kos Moonbats-SCHIP family being Freeped!(We're "Swiftboating Them! ROTFLMAO!)
 
And Now You Know . . . [Dan Collins]

the rest of the story!  Why in the world do these people need SCHIP? And how does a $45,000 a year reported income manage to send two kids at once to a $20,000 a year private school? This is a blatant fraud by the Democrats and easily checked.

Private School and A Large House, But No Health Insurance? : The American Pundit  "A half-a-million dollar home, $190,000 in commercial property, successful architect grandfathers, owning his own design company, a beautiful kitchen complete with what appears to be granite counter tops, an estimated $1,200 a month mortgage, personal injury auto insurance required in Maryland, but the Frosts couldn’t afford an estimated $452? Hmm."

Flopping Aces: "This is the family the Democrats chose to represent SCHIP?  If there was a more perfect family why SCHIP should not be expanded its this one."

SCHIP--Limbaugh, Hannity and Hewett will bash the Dems nicely with this most recent gifty stick.  Is there ONE non-phony within the Dem collective?

Little Graham Frost of Baltimore addressed the nation this week as the Democratic spokesperson, pleading against President Bush’s promise to veto legislation that would expand S-CHIP health coverage for children.  It has been a long road for Graham, aged 12, who was seriously injured in a traffic accident while on his bike.  According to his mom, it would cost the family about $1200 per month for private insurance, if not for the government program, while the family takes in only about $45,000 a year.  In an article in the Baltimore Sun, Graham’s father is characterized as a common woodworker.  That is, until a blogger, calling himself

“icwhatudo” at Free Republic, however, showed rather more curiosity than the professional reporter paid to investigate the story and did a bit of Googling. Mr Frost, the “woodworker”, owns his own design company and the commercial property it operates from, part of which space he also rents out; they have a 3,000-sq-ft home on a street where a 2,000-sq-ft home recently sold for half a million dollars; he was able to afford to send two children simultaneously to a $20,000-a-year private school; his father and grandfather were successful New York designers and architects; etc. This is apparently the new definition of “working families”.

Powerline: "Why is it that the chance of any mainstream media reporter doing easy internet research to check the accuracy of the Democrats' story, as this Freeper did, is exactly zero?"

I’m glad little Graham and his family were able to get help, and I hope he reaches full rehabilitation.  But perhaps the Democrats ought to take more care in the spokespeople they choose, if they wish to tug at our heartstrings.

Blue Crab Boulevard has the roundup.

Posted by Dan Collins @ 12:16 pm
Comments (18)
 
The "Not So Poor" 12 Year Old Who Rebutted Bush on SCHIP Veto--a middle school student at the exclusive$20,000 per year Park School in Baltimore...Reid and Pelosi at it again...
according to the Baltimore Sun article it was Reid’s office that contacted the boy. The Senate staffers wrote his script, so they weren't even his own thoughts. Reid describes having the boy give the prepared speech as having a “real heavy weight”...ok, all groan with me in unison.
 
The left cares about nothing but its own perpetuation--They will pimp children to demagogue issues, as in this photo. They will pimp other children and LIE about who they are, as they did when they said that the child who gave the radio address on the S-CHIP issue was from a poor family. Just using the child at all is a disgusting display of shameless pandering, but as this intrepid Freeper has pointed out, the child isn't even exactly who they said he was.
 
During John Kerry's nomination acceptance speech during the 2004 DNC, he trotted out his health insurance "poster child", Mary Ann Knowles...
Video of Kerry's Speech

FR Links On This Story
 
 Al Gore tried this same tactic in 2000 with Winifred Skinner.
 

Here’s one that pretty interesting too.

Hillary’s poisoned poster child

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/michelle/malkin020400.asp

FLORIDA IS HOME to an ill-fated child whose life was ruined upon becoming a political pawn.

In 1994, Hillary Clinton used Kathy Bush when citing her case as an example of the high cost of medical care.

Top 1% Pay More Income Tax Than Bottom 90%

Congress’ "Stealth Tax" gets 23.4 million Households in 2007

Need insurance? No license? No problem!--Slowly but surely this country is setting up two sets of laws. One for illegals and one for the rest of us. The illegals get winked at while the rest of us get our feet held to the fire.

Obama courted Hsu (Hi$$ary wasn't the only RAT after Chicom funny money)

Global Warming: No Match for the Coming Ice Age

In search of the NAFTA highway to hell

CIA man recounts Che Guevara's death--

Here’s a great article on the murderous SOB and the mindless cult that’s grown up around him.

http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=4450

DMV's fraud busts hit Latinos


7,692 posted on 10/08/2007 4:33:44 PM PDT by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

POSTER-CHILD ABUSE: "The newspapers don’t want to do their jobs. The vacuum is being filled. If you don’t want questions, don’t foist these children onto the public stage."

Update 5:30pm Eastern. A word for all the faux outraged leftists accusing conservative bloggers of waging a “smear campaign:” Asking questions and subjecting political anecdotes to scrutiny are what journalists should be doing.

Bob at InsureBlog does some more reporting (now defined as “stalking” by the unhinged left):

It turns out–as it does with so many health care stories pimped by the Democrats and the MSM–that there is much more to the Frosts’ story than meets the eye.

FreeRepublic member icwhatudo asks the tough questions the mainstream media won’t ask. Like why a “working family” in need of government-subsidized health care can afford to send two children to a $20,000-a-year-private school. And more (go to the post for more embedded links):

It’s par for the course. The use of Graeme Frost was part of a larger left-wing strategy to hide behind children and use them as cannon fodder in their losing bid to get S-CHIP passed into law. Predictably, the reflexive left is already lambasting those who scrutinized the Frosts’ case.

In 1994, Hillary helped turn the ailing girl into a national prop. As I reported several years ago, it wasn’t merely a case of Democrat legislation-by-anecdote run amok. It was a case of notorious poster child abuse:

The Baltimore Reporter recalls some more dubious Democrat health-care poster people.

More blog reax…

Brutally Honest
STACLU
Kathy Shaidle

And the Influence Peddler points to a case of phony health care poster child abuse. Not the first time.

More here: "So executive vice-presidents' families are now the new new poor? I support lower taxes for the Frosts, increased child credits for the Frosts, an end to the 'death tax' and other encroachments on transgenerational wealth transfer, and even severe catastrophic medical-emergency aid of one form or other. But there is no reason to put more and more middle-class families on the government teat, and doing so is deeply corrosive of liberty." Maybe that is the reason. And hey, it might sell. (Via Danny Glover).

Our basic freedoms are under attack — in plain sight — with the likes of Henry Wack-job using MY MONEY to have his staff amass files on Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and Fox News so he can SHUT THEM DOWN, Stalin style.

 
Even
-more--
BlogWarZ:
 
http://www.gulfcoastpundit.com/index.php?/forums/viewthread/4761/
windybon - 08 October 2007 07:49 PM

CO, many of us here have never met any other poster in person.  I came to GCP because some of my favorite posters were here, and I’ve never felt unwelcome.  I think you’ll fit in quite nicely here.

Now I have to go to bed.  ‘Night all!

That’s why I came here initially- I kept noticing posters at OATPTSERUUAF ( Over At That Place That Shall Evermore Remain Unmentioned, Unlinked, And Forgotten ) getting whacked whose comments I liked, or agreed with, or thought were the most incisive.

And I also noticed, and noted, the snarky comments of those remaining at That Place That Shall Evermore Remain Unmentioned, Unlinked, And Forgotten-- defaming and slandering those who can no longer speak up in their own defense is a really big no-no in that “book I keep in my head of stuff you should and should not do in life.”
( Oddly, or perhaps not given my age and background, it can be summed up as “The Cowboy Way...” )

The Cowboy Way

Be that as it may, I did not like some of the things I was seeing at a place I once admired and quoted. And Chuckles didn’t like my association with this place… but from where I stand, that’s his loss.

And I’m more a Lurker & Linker, than commentator, anyway-- and like Windy, Real Life ( the meatworld interface ) intrudes- got a dog that needs to go out, and a wife 10 years younger than me, who’s falling apart at the seams faster than I am, that need attention…

Gating back out,
into the Aether…
The image “http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v117/rollinson/chcat2.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

I’m dense. What does it mean?--" Can someone please tell me what heather means? I see I am non heather."

I’m pretty sure there is a wiki entry on the site re: it ... Dirka dirka!

The short version—several months before the night of the banned of brothers, one of the foolish posters [the ones chuckette kept!] melted down hugely, and began accusing many of the posters here of being drunks, skanks, etc.
Someone brought up the term “heathers” after the crappy early 80s movie of the same title—during the same conversation, the accusations of “elite” and “super elite” also came up ...

and then several months ago when nbpundit asked for suggestions for a new rating system for no. of posts made here, Mike C. tossed out “Heathers” and the rest, as they say, is history ...

Richard Warman attacks free speech, Free Dominion BREAKING [ 1 ... 30, 31, 32 ]

Dear Free Speech Supporter:

Free Dominion (http://www.freedominion.ca) is a conservative website and group of former Reform Party members eager to see strict conservative principles and policies followed in the newly amalgamated Conservative Party of Canada.

This June they found themselves the subject of a complaint -- amazingly this one not by Richard Warman -- under Sec.13.1 -- the Internet censorship provisions of the Canadian Human Rights Commission. The complaint had to do with postings by one of their correspondents critical of one of Canada's privileged minorities -- homosexuals.

The Free Dominion folks were shocked at this assault on free speech. We had warned more conservative people -- religious and otherwise -- that they too would join more outspoken people -- like Zundel and young White nationalists -- as victims of Sec. 13.1 censorship. After all, it's not really about "hate", it's about throttling of dissent and criticism of privileged minorities.

The complainant, a Quebec academic, withdrew the complaint, apparently not having the stomach for a protracted battle. It seemed that Free Dominion had dodged the bullet.

But, no so fast. Connie Wilkins and her husband now find themselves threatened with libel action by the litigious Richard Warman who loves to dish out abuse and complaints, criminal and otherwise, but is hyper thin-skinned about any criticism of his anti-free speech activities. He howls every time he's called a censor. [He's filed 26 Internet censorship complaints and numerous Sec. 319 "hate" law complaints. He's no censor or thought control wannabe. He's Canada's foremost supporter of free an open discussion (and President for Life Kim Jong Il is a genius.)

Connie Wilkins continues the story: "Tonight we answered a knock on our door and we were served with papers from Richard Warman (famous human rights complaint filer)...

Foundation Watch: Soros’s Democracy Alliance

October 9th, 2007

From a December 2006 article in the Capital Research Center publication Foundation Watch (pdf file):

 

George Soros’s Democracy Alliance: In Search Of A Permanent Democratic Majority

By James Dellinger and Matthew Vadum

Despondent after George W. Bush won re-election, a small group of billionaire Democrats met in San Francisco in December 2004 to reflect on John Kerry’s failure to capture the White House. George Soros, Progressive Insurance chairman Peter B. Lewis, and S&L tycoons Herb and Marion Sandler were angry and depressed. They felt they had been taken—seduced by the siren song of pollsters and the mainstream media who had assured them that the capture of the executive mansion was theirs. But despite giving millions of dollars to liberal candidates and 527 political committees, the donors came away with nothing. At about the same time another group of wealthy Democratic donors was meeting at a hotel in Washington, D.C. feeling the same way. “The U.S. didn’t enter World War II until Japan bombed Pearl Harbor,” political consultant Erica Payne told the meeting. “We just had our Pearl Harbor.”

Determined to bring the Democratic Party back from the political wilderness, Soros and the others decided they needed a long-term strategy to regain power. Former Clinton official Rob Stein urged them to copy conservatives who had spent four decades investing in ideas and institutions with staying power. Over the next year Stein would become well-known for a PowerPoint presentation called “The Conservative Message Machine’s Money Matrix.” He used graphs and charts to show how the conservative movement was comprised of an intricate network of organizations, funders and activists. Stein’s presentation was apparently convincing. In 2005 the Democracy Alliance was born. It was an odd name for a loose collection of superrich donors committed to building organizations that would propel America to the left.

In April 2005, Soros gathered together an even larger group. Seventy millionaires and billionaires met in Phoenix, Arizona, to firm up the details for their fledging political financing clearinghouse. The attendees heard presentations on why all the pro-Democratic Party 527 groups on which they lavished millions of dollars failed to deliver the election to Kerry. But now they had a new strategy to make a difference.

Finances

To join the Democracy Alliance, there is one requirement: You must be rich. Members, who are called “partners,” pay an initial $25,000 fee and $30,000 in yearly dues. They also must pledge to give at least $200,000 annually to groups that Democracy Alliance endorses. Partners meet two times a year in committees to decide on grants, which focus on four areas: media, ideas, leadership, and civic engagement. Recommendations are then made to the DA board, which passes them on to all DA partners. The Alliance discourages partners from discussing DA affairs with the media and it requires its grant recipients to sign nondisclosure agreements.

As a result, it is hard to learn much about the Alliance’s grant making. There were no grants voted on at the DA’s April 2005 organizing meeting in Phoenix. However, when the group met in October of that year at the Chateau Elan Winery & Resort in Atlanta, Georgia, it decided behind closed doors to dole out $28 million to nine grantees. Most of that money went to well-known groups, including the Center for American Progress and Media Matters for America.

Representatives of smaller, less prominent groups were reportedly miffed at the process. “No one knew why the nine groups had been picked. Funding progressive infrastructure was all well and good, but no one bothered defining precisely what ‘progressive’ meant,” wrote Ari Berman, a writer for the leftist Nation magazine. “There was an almost complete lack of actual substance,” Berman quoted one attendee saying.

After the negative feedback from the Phoenix meeting, DA leaders changed the process and allowed groups to apply for grants. The next meeting, held in Austin, Texas, in May

2006, was better received in left-wing circles. Progressive leaders such as Andy Stern, who is president of Service Employees International Union, spoke during panel discussions, and grant-seekers were allowed to network with DA partners. “I’ve made it a mission to hate the Democracy Alliance,” Berman quoted one attendee who heads a grant-seeking group, “and I was pleasantly surprised.”

With an eye on the approaching November elections, the Alliance decided to give another $22 million to 16 groups focused on electoral politics. These groups included the Center for Community Change, US Action, ACORN, EMILY’s List, and the Sierra Club. Former president Bill Clinton dropped by the Austin meeting for a friendly greeting, but when one DA partner asked why Democrats don’t apologize for supporting the Iraq war, Clinton went on a 10-minute tirade, yelling that if he had been in Congress, he would have voted to authorize the war. “It was an extraordinary display of anger and imperiousness,” said partner Guy Saperstein, an Oakland, California attorney. “Clinton’s response was a not-so-subtle warning to partners to avoid divisive issues, like the war, that might harm his wife in the next president election,” wrote Berman.

The DA’s third round of funding was expected to be decided at a Miami, Florida, meeting scheduled for November 2006. Details of the meeting were not available at Foundation Watch’s press time.

DA’s managing director, Judy Wade, said she hopes the Alliance will work with other funding groups and eventually give out $500 million in grants each year.

Selected Grant Recipients

We can identify a number of left-wing groups that have gone through the DA’s vetting process and received funding. Some grant amounts have been reported in the press but there is no official tally.

*Media Matters for America: Former conservative journalist David Brock’s group claims to expose right-wing news bias. The Internet-based media watchdog, launched in May 2004, describes itself as “a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3)progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.”

*Center for American Progress: Former Clinton White House chief of staff John Podesta heads the think tank that received $5 million from the DA. The organization aspires to be the Heritage Foundation of the left. Spinoffs include Campus Progress and the Center for American Progress Action Fund, a 50 1(c)(4) lobby group. The Action Fund’s “Kick the Oil Habit” campaign is led by actor-environmentalist Robert Redford.

*Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW):

This Soros-funded group sees itself as a left-wing version of Judicial Watch, the conservative legal group that filed a barrage of lawsuits against the Clinton administration in the 1990s.CREW executive director Melanie Sloan is a former U.S. Attorney and Democratic counsel for the House Judiciary Committee….

*Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN): ACORN is a radical activist group active in housing programs and “living wage” campaigns in inner cities neighborhoods in more than 75 U.S. cities. In recent years it has been implicated in a number of fraudulent voter-registration schemes.

*EMILY’s List: While the political action committee boasts that it is “the nation’s largest grassroots political network,” it is essentially a fundraising vehicle for pro-abortion rights female political candidates. Donations to the organization are not tax-deductible. EMILY, according to the group’s website, “is an acronym for ‘Early Money Is Like Yeast’ (it helps the dough rise).” The group’s president is veteran political fundraiser Ellen Malcolm.

*America Votes: Another get-out-the-vote 527 organization, it is headed by Maggie Fox, a former deputy executive director of the Sierra Club. The group received a $6 million funding commitment from George Soros despite the billionaire’s protestations that he has turned his back on political campaigns.

*Air America: The struggling left-wing talk radio network filed for bankruptcy protection on October 13 after it reportedly had received a funding commitment of at least $8 million from the Alliance. The network touted by comedian Al Franken is said to have lost an astounding $41 million since 2004. Longtime radio executive Scott Elberg is Air America’s chief executive officer. The network’s headliners include TV sleaze merchant Jerry Springer.

*Center for Community Change: This longtime group dedicated to defending welfare entitlements and leftist anti-poverty programs was founded in 1968. Activist Deepak Bhargava is its executive director.

*US Action: This group works closely with organized labor. It is the successor to Citizen Action, the activist group discredited by its involvement in the money-laundering scandal to re-elect Teamsters president Ron Carey in the late 1990s.

*Data Warehouse: This group was created by Clinton aide Harold Ickes and Democratic operative Laura Quinn. Ickes is critical of the Democratic National Committee under chairman Howard Dean and aims to create a sophisticated get-out-the-vote operation that rivals the Republican Party’s. Ickes proposes to build detailed voter lists that will be made available to Democratic Party candidates, and also to advocacy groups. According to a report in the Washington Post, George Soros put $11 million at Ickes’s disposal because he distrusts Howard Dean.

Does It Have A Mission?

Obviously Democracy Alliance participants have the capacity to make big grants to leftist groups, but are George Soros and his friends doing anything different that will transform America? That’s what the Alliance is promising. After the Phoenix meeting, Sarah Ingersoll, a de facto spokeswoman for the Alliance, said the group was still ironing out details. “Primarily, we’re looking at making recommendations and thinking through with these donors on how they can form an alliance. This is about creating a network of individuals to share information to be effective in whatever they do going forward.”

Ingersoll said the Alliance intended to make details of its grant making publicly available. But that promise has not been fulfilled

 

How dependent is the left on big donors? In his recent book, The Big Ripoff: How Big Business and Big Government Steal Your Money, (Wiley, 2006) Timothy Carney itemizes left-wing political contributions in 2004:

The top four donors to 527s in 2004 — and the only donors to spend in the eight figures on that election — all gave exclusively to pro-Democrat groups. Of the top 25 individual donors—all billionaires or multi-millionaires— 15 of them gave to pro-Democrat groups, and 10 gave to Republican- supporting groups. From this elite group of super-rich donors, the Democratic side got $108.4 million, compared to the Republican side’s $40 million. Soros and Lewis together spent more to defeat Bush than the ten most prolific Republican fat cats combined spent supporting the President.”

Alliance Leadership

The ostensible leaders of the Democracy Alliance are an odd lot, which may explain why the organization has had a hard time making much of a dent in politics.

Rob McKay, president of the McKay Family Foundation, is the new chairman of the DA. He was elected at the group’s July 2006 meeting in Boulder, Colorado. Heir to the Taco Bell fortune, the 42 year-old McKay is also a director of Vanguard Public Foundation, co-chairman of Mother Jones magazine, a board member of the Ms. Foundation for Women, and a blogger on the Huffington Post website. He was born in conservative Orange County, California and his parents were Republicans. However, like many on the left he had an awakening. McKay succeeds Steven M. Gluckstern, a founding managing director of Azimuth Alternative Assets, an investment banking firm.

The vice chairman is Anna Burger, sometimes known as the “Queen of Labor.” Burger is secretary-treasurer of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the militant union that walked out of the AFL-CIO last year and started the 6-million member Change to Win Federation, an alternative labor coalition. After she was elected chairman of Change to Win in 2005, Gannett News Service hailed Burger as arguably “the most influential woman in the U.S. labor movement.”

The first managing director of the Democracy Alliance was Rob Stein, once chief of staff to the late Ron Brown, Bill Clinton’s first commerce secretary. Stein dazzled the billionaires with his PowerPoint presentation but he turned out to be a poor manager. Early in 2006, the board offered the $400,000-a-year job to Robert Dunn, a former president of Business for Social Responsibility, a group promoting the concept of corporate social responsibility. When he declined it, the board turned to Judy Wade, a management consultant at McKinsey& Company…

The designated spokesman for the DA is supposedly Mike McCurry, the former White House press secretary for Bill Clinton. But little has been heard from McCurry about the Alliance. Lately his public relations talents have been devoted to attacking “net neutrality” legislation regulating the Internet. That has led some left-wing activists to accuse him of helping the big telecommunications companies. McCurry “represents a sickening breed of operative” and is the agent of a “hostile takeover” of the Democratic Party, charges activist David Sirota, a former press aide to socialist congressman Bernie Sanders and recently a consultant to the Ned Lamont Senate campaign in Connecticut. That sort of vitriol suggests the problems billionaires face when they pass themselves off as leaders of the left

Democracy Alliance leaders are tight-lipped about future plans. At press time, Soros had not been quoted in the media with any reaction to the Democrats’ electoral triumph. Nor had Peter B. Lewis, the 72-year-old insurance magnate, who suffered a heart attack and was hospitalized just before the November election…

The Democracy Alliance may have as many as 100 donor-members, both individuals and organizations. However, it has not made available an official list of its “partners.” Here are known members:

George Soros, the billionaire head of Soros Fund Management LLC, Soros is founder of Quantum Asset Management and the grant-making Open Society Institute. He donated $24 million of his own money to 527 committees that made “independent expenditures” to defeat George W. Bush in 2004. His son Jonathan is also a member of the DA.

Peter B. Lewis  is a billionaire insurance magnate — chairman of Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., the nation’s third-largest automobile insurer. He gave $23 million to 527 groups in 2004.

Rob McKay, heir to the Taco Bell fortune, is chairman of the DA. Enamored of tedious class-warfare rhetoric, McKay wrote at the Huffington Post website last year that “the richest Americans are getting extravagantly richer and the poor are crawling far behind, choking on the exhaust of our luxury cars. It’s also obvious that Bush’s tax policies are widening the gap between the very rich and the growing poor.”

Herb and Marion Sandler are the co-founders of Golden West Financial Corp. They sold their S&L holding company to Wachovia in May for $24 billion in cash and stock. In 2004 they gave $13 million to anti-Bush 527s.

Guy Saperstein, an Oakland, California trial lawyer, made Bill Clinton angry when he asked about Hillary’s support for the Iraq war at a May 2006 DA meeting in Austin, Texas, Arianna Huffington reported on her blog.

Rob Reiner, a Hollywood actor-director, is chairman of Parents Action for Children, a 501(c)(3) advocacy group. In 2005 he promoted Proposition 82, an unsuccessful California ballot initiative that would have raised state taxes to fund preschool for all four year-olds.

Herb Miller is a prominent Washington, D.C. real estate developer and Democratic Party fundraiser who just lost a bitter battle with the Lerner family, owners of D.C.’s new baseball franchise. Miller expected the city to authorize him to develop housing and retail near the taxpayer-subsidized stadium. The Lerners, however, demand that the city build parking structures fast and cheap before the 2008 baseball season begins. Any development “comes later,” they say.

David A. Friedman, a philanthropist and self-described centrist, is treasurer of the Friedman Family Foundation of San Mateo, California.

Ann S. Bowers is the widow of Intel cofounder Robert Noyce, inventor of the integrated circuit and “mayor of Silicon Valley.” Bowers is board chairman of Noyce Foundation.

Albert C. Yates is former president of Colorado State University.

Davidi Gio is a Cupertino, California high-tech entrepreneur and founder of Vyyo Inc. who made the Mother Jones 400 list of big leftist donors. His wife, Shamaya, created the Winds of Change Foundation in 1998, and is a heavy donor to Democratic candidates.

Mark Buell, is a San Francisco businessman. His wife, Susie Tompkins Buell, co-founded the clothier Esprit with her ex-husband, Douglas Tompkins, who is president of the Foundation for Deep Ecology.

Tim Gill (shown above) is the software entrepreneur who founded Quark, the design and layout publishing program. Gill is also president of the Gill Foundation in Denver, a funder of gay rights organizations.

Fred Baron, founder of the Dallas law firm Baron& Budd, is one of America’ s wealthiest plaintiffs’ attorneys and has won settlements in major asbestos and toxic chemicals class-action suits. He was finance chairman for Senator John Edwards’s 2004 presidential campaign.

Service Employees International Union (SEIU) is an institutional member of the DA.

Alan Patric of is co-founder of private equity firm Apax Partners in New York. From 1993 to 1995, he was chairman of the White House Conference on Small Business.

Bren Simon is president of MBS Associates LLC, a property management and development firm. Her husband, Melvin, ranks 278 on the 2006 Forbes list of the world’s richest people. He is a part owner of the Indiana Pacers and runs the Simon Property Group, developer of shopping malls. (It is not known if Mr. Simon is active in the DA.)

Chris Gabrieli is a software entrepreneur and unsuccessful 2006 candidate for the Democratic nomination for governor of Massachusetts. He is also co-founder and chairman of Massachusetts 2020 Foundation, which describes itself on its website as “a non-profit foundation aimed at expanding educational and economic opportunities for children and families across Massachusetts.” Anne Bartley, the daughter of Winthrop Rockefeller, is vice chairman of Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors and a trustee of the Jennifer Altman Foundation in San Francisco.

Simon Rosenberg is the founder and president of the New Democrat Network. He wrote the foreword to Crashing the Gate: Netroots, Grassroots, and the Rise of People-Powered Politics, a book by leftist bloggers Markos Moulitsas Zuniga (Daily Kos) and Jerome Armstrong (MyDD.com). Rosenberg ran unsuccessfully in 2005 for the chairmanship of the Democratic National Committee.

Bernard L. Schwartz is former CEO of Loral Space & Communications. In the 1990s he was often ranked as largest individual donor to the DNC. His wife Irene is the president of the Bernard and Irene Schwartz Foundation, a large donor to the Clinton Library Foundation.

Lewis B. Cullman is a New York financier and philanthropist. His web site says he has given away $223 million to date.

Rob Glaser is CEO of the online multimedia company Real Networks.

Rob Johnson is a former portfolio manager for George Soros’s Quantum Fund. According to Johnson: “It’s almost as if the market is a religious icon. I see that mirrored in the very, very high valuation of the United States stock market and the tremendous conviction that citizens have throughout the country that the United States is good, is right. The free market is great, and the stock market is where you put your money.”

Michael Kieschnick is founder of Working Assets. Every time a customer uses one of the Working Assets donation-linked services (long distance, wireless and credit card), the company donates a portion of the charges to “nonprofit groups working to build a world that is more just, humane, and environmentally sustainable,” according to the company’s website, which claims that over $50 million has been raised for progressive causes.

Gara LaMarche is vice president and director of U.S. Programs for George Soros’ s Open Society Institute.

Norman Lear is the Hollywood television producer who created “All in the Family” and “Sanford and Son.”

Drummond Pike is an antiwar activist who founded the Tides Foundation.

– James Dellinger and Matthew Vadum

James Dellinger is Executive Director of Green Watch and Education Watch at Capital Research Center. Matthew Vadum is Editor of Foundation Watch.

Editor’s Note: This article has drawn heavily upon “Big $$ for Progressive Politics,” by Ari Berman (The Nation, October 16, 2006), and “A New Alliance Of Democrats Spreads Funding,” by Jim VandeHei and Chris Cillizza (Washington Post, July 17, 2006).

So now we know a little bit more about the money behind Media Matters and much else going on in the Democrat operations.

1 Comment »

More About The Donors Behind Media Matters

October 8th, 2007

This is an excerpt from a July 2007 article in the Capital Research Center publication Foundation Watch (pdf file):

David Brock

Media Matters for America: Soros-Funded Watchdog Attacks Conservatives

By Rondi Adamson

Following the Money

David Brock’s confessional writings make clear that he yearns to schmooze. Deeply wounded when the conservative A-list turned against him, he now associates with Hollywood glitterati, champagne socialists and establishment movers and shakers who are financing his online mud-wrestling at MMFA. According to the New York Times,

MMFA received “more than $2 million from wealthy liberals” as start-up money in 2004. Initial donors included cable executive Leo Hindery Jr., philanthropist James Hormel, shopping mall magnate Bren Simon, and Susie Tompkins Buell, who with her husband Douglas co-founded the Esprit clothing chain.

Buell, who met Brock at a get-together of Hillary Clinton supporters, held a fundraiser for him at her San Francisco home.

Brock has been less than open – there’s a temptation to use that word “slippery” – over MMFA’s financing. At first Media Matters spokeswoman Sally Aman insisted that “neither Media Matters nor its president and CEO David Brock has received any money from Soros or from any organization with which he is affiliated.”

But George Soros has been a major force in funding MMFA – indirectly perhaps, but powerfully, nonetheless. In early 2005, MMFA, through a spokeswoman, allowed that “the group is no longer disavowing any connection” with groups “affiliated” with Soros.

The decision to come clean, more or less, was preceded – or perhaps, expedited – by Cybercast News Service, which looked into MMFA’s financial ties. According to a CNS article (March 3, 2005), “there were numerous and extensive links between Media Matters and several Soros ‘affiliates’ like MoveOn.org, the Center for American Progress and Soros ally Peter Lewis.”

And in an email to CNS regarding MMFA’s financial backers, spokeswoman Sally Aman wrote: “In response to your query regarding donor funding Media Matters for America has never received funding directly from George Soros.” Aman acknowledged support from MoveOn.org and the New Democrat Network.

She also named as a donor Soros’s friend Peter Lewis, the insurance tycoon who founded Progressive Corporation. Soros and Lewis were the top two donors to anti-Bush “527” political pressure groups during the 2004 election campaign. Each gave more than $20 million to the ostensibly independent organizations.

Regarding the dissembling and waffling around the Soros relationship, conservative activist David Horowitz said, “This is typical of Brock’ s operation. They split hairs to present an untruth…Once you have the names of donors, once you know Peter Lewis is involved, you can’t deny it [the Soros affiliation].”

Another Soros-backed think tank, the Center for American Progress (CAP), has also supported MMFA. John Podesta, CAP’s president and Bill Clinton’s former chief of staff, told the New York Sun that in 2004 CAP aided Brock by offering office space and administrative assistance.

According to its tax records, MMFA took in $155,100 in grants in 2003 and $3,564,471 in grants in 2004. Its tax return dated December 31,2005, lists income of $8,489,663 and assets of $6,344,165.

Major funders of MMFA include the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy, whose president is PBS pundit Bill Moyers ($500,000 in2005), the Gruber Family Foundation ($200,000 in 2004-5), the Barbra Streisand Foundation $25,000 ($35,000 in 2004-5), the Arca Foundation ($100,000 in 2004), and the Bernard & Audre Rapoport Foundation ($50,000 in 2005).

The Bohemian Foundation gave $475,000 in2004-5. Its president is Colorado heir Patricia Stryker, the 278th richest American (on the 2006 Forbes 400 list). The Glaser Progress Foundation, whose president is Real Networks media software creator Rob Glaser, gave $100,000 in 2005.

At least two funders –the Stephen M. Silberstein Foundation ($100,000 in 2003) and the Susie Tompkins Buell Foundation ($200,000 in 2004)— gave money to MMFA through the Tides Foundation, which serves as a financial intermediary for left-wing nonprofits and foundations.

The press also reports that the Democracy Alliance, the Soros-inspired consortium of extremely wealthy liberal donors, has committed to give $50 million to selected left-wing think tanks and advocacy organizations. MMFA and John Podesta’s Center for American Progress were among the first beneficiaries

Some more names for the hopper, including that great champion of “free speech,” Bill Moyers. But there are also the by now familiar names, such as the Buells.

From a footnote on page 401 of the Gerth and Van Nata book on Hillary Clinton, Her Way:

43. Newsday, September 7, 2006, A28, and New York Times, May 3, 2004, A21. Brock, in an e-mail to an author in 2007, said Hillary “was one of a large number of progressive leaders who were interested in the issue of build­ing progressive infrastructure.” One of Hillary’s closest friends, Susie Tompkins Buell, held a fund-raiser for Brock’s cause, and almost half of the Susie Tompkins Buell Foundation’s grants in 2004 and 2005 went to Media Matters. (Clinton, Living History, 334, for discussion of their friendship. Form 990 Annual Reports of the Susie Tompkins Buell Foun­dation for 2004 and 2005 show grants of $300,000 out of total grants of $636,000. See Byron York, “David Brock Is Buzzing Again,” National Review, June 14, 2004, for discussion of the fund-raiser.)

As the authors note, Susie Buell is often described as Hillary Clinton’s closest friend.


Hillary Clinton with Susie and Mark Buell.

Indeed, the two are so close that Clinton threw an engagement party for the Buells at the White House.

Some further (and not any too flattering) elucidation of the colorful Susie Thompkins Buell can be found here.

No Comments »
 
A decay not likely to be reversed

MIchael Barone surveys the disgraceful state of our major colleges and universities. Barone elegantly summarizes the problems -- speech codes, racially discriminatory admissions policies, dishonest administrators, domination of humanities departments by leftist professors intent on portraying American society as evil -- and shows how these phenomena are inter-related. Thus, speech codes protect the feelings of students admitted with relatively poor credentials pursuant to racial quotas. Meanwhile, administrators must insist that they aren't using racial quotas in admissions, so that to be an administrator at one of these elite institutions "you have to be willing to lie about what you consider one of your most important duties." But it isn't really lying because, as the humanities department has explained, "truth" is merely a construct of our racist, sexist, homophobic, and imperialistic society.

Barone concludes by asking why that society "is willing to support such institutions by paying huge tuitions, providing tax exemptions and making generous gifts." The main reason, I think, is that people outside of academia have little idea about what's going on there. Most people simply assume that the colleges of today are pretty much like those of their youth, differing only in that they are more expensive, have better food, and are more congenial to women and minority group members.

There are also limits on what people can do to reverse the descent of our colleges and universities. State universities have some accountability to voters, and thus generally are not the worst offenders. However, as I noted recently, even when the voters say in the clearest possible terms that race is not be a factor in the admissions process at state universities, those in charge are quite willing to thumb their noses at the law.

Elite private colleges are even less constrained. They face little if any competition from colleges that don't fit the post-modern leftist mold. No one likely to break that mold has much chance of being entrusted to run such an institution, and the demise of Larry Summers at Harvard illustrates the fate that awaits even a mild iconoclast who manages to crash the party. And a hypothetical college that somehow succeeded in breaking the mold would likely be punished, plummeting in college ratings that rely on the views of entrenched academics to assess "academic reputation."

In theory, alumni should be able to act as a voice of sanity. But colleges have structured themselves (or in Dartmouth's case, restructured itself) in a way that deprives alumni of any real voice. The only thing they get to say is "yes" or "no" to requests for donations. With only a dim sense of what's going on, a critical mass continues to say "yes."

Thus, the rot continues to spread, with no end in sight.

To comment on this post, go here.

Posted by Paul at 8:34 PM | Permalink 
 
The west fades in Holland

When the Dutch Islamist Mohammad Bouyeri butchered Dutch film director Theo Van Gogh in response to a film by Van Gogh about the oppression of Muslim women, it seemed plausible to think the Dutch might finally awaken to the internal threat posed by Islamofascism, at least to the extent of rallying to defend their own free speech rights. Today, as Anne Applebaum shows, it's no longer plausible to believe this.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Dutch-Somali politician, wrote the script for Van Gogh's film. The knife Bouyeri thrust into Van Gogh contained a death threat directed at Hirsi Ali. Even before this event, she had been under Dutch police protection. But last year, the Dutch government tried to revoke her citizenship. And last week, the government cut off her security funding. Currently, she lives in the U.S. under privately financed security protection. The Dutch are about to debate whether to resume funding.

How that debate turns out is probably immaterial. The fact that the Dutch are having this debate, instead of debating the quickest way to arrest and/or deport the Islamists who pose such a threat to their freedoms, tells me that the game is probably lost in Holland.

Posted by Paul at 11:04 PM | Permalink  
 

Oh sure. Like I wasn't gonna post this...

Mark Steyn:

"This is a brilliant piece. Kathy Shaidle should turn it into a book."

I make unconvincing noises of protest here.

Posted by KShaidle at 8:25 PM | Comments (27)
 
 

Revolution in Jesusland: a guided tour for secular progressives to America's fourth Great Awakening

Ex-Kerry online organizer Zack Exley's newish blog about, well, what it says.

He's chronicling the allegedly growing Christian Left in America, from the position of "largely un-churched"  outsider of good will. Who, predictably, is being criticized for being "too critical", by the same people whose side he's on. Gee, sounds familiar!

Too bad this allegedly growing Christian Left is doomed to crumble.

It’s just those Bible-Fundamentalist, Anti-Enlightenment, Creationist, Republican-voting Christian Neanderthals again…

Move along. Nothing to see here.

Except that they’re wrestling with what Jesus meant when he said they would find Him among the poorest of the poor…And it’s leading them to think about turning the economy upside downAs they struggle desperately to find ways to rescue everyone in poverty. I wanted to do this blog to dispel some of the shallow stereotypes about evangelicals—but at this conference I find myself having to catch my breath over and over, because I didn’t expect it to be THIS different.

That message of turning your whole life over to the poor—and organizing your church to do the same–is almost the dominant theme at Catalyst this year. 

Zack reports there were about a thousand attendees at that conference. Are there even a thousand really poor people in all of America? Really poor. Dying-on-the-sidewalks-with-open-sores poor?

The so-called poor have cars and cable tv and free medical. They live in America in the 21st century, where school is free and libraries are free and a bus ticket to a better town costs less than a bag of crack. If they're "poor" it's because they were too lazy and stupid to a) finish high school and/or b) keep their pants on. Jesus had something to say about folks who didn't properly manage their money or other people's, and who squandered free gifts and good will. He told the adulteress to sin no more, not to find herself another baby daddy.

I was part of a similar "movement" twenty years ago. It failed then and it will fail again because socialism is fundamentally flawed and cannot work for long periods. Like anarchism, it is parasitical, relying upon the success of its despised capitalist host. That core contradiction dooms socialism to failure. Dorothy Day kept the Catholic Worker House open thanks to donations from guilt ridden rich people. One can multiply examples ad infinitum.

Why do "right wing Christians" seem to "care" more about abortion, or terrorism, or gay marriage/adoption or even the hoax known as global warming, more than they "care" about the poor? I plead guilty -- because there are more radical gays and feminists and global warming hoaxers than there are poor people in North America. These activists want to brainwash our kids, or worse. And terrorists want to blow them up. In the face of such threats, forgive me if the fact that Lakeesha can't afford a new weave this week cuz she spent all her money on a new cell phone fails to get me humming "I Dreamed I Saw Joe Hill Last Night."

I used to work at one of Canada's biggest and most respected charities. Everyone there was sincerely well-intentioned and dedicated. Most of them were of above-average intelligence. But one day the time came to release their report about "the growth of poverty in Toronto".

The report was released with a flurry of media fanfare and public events.

So: how much had "poverty" "increased" in Toronto during the past 5 years?

One percentage point.

Leaving aside the issue of how poverty is measured... one percentage point. Sort of like how "global warming" comes down to a one-degree increase in temps over the past hundred years.

Of course, if you're a regular reader, you can guess what happened next. The staff was treated to a preview of the big Power Point presentation before it was unveiled to the media and the mayor.

I raised my hand:

"But isn't one percentage point (and it IS one percentage point, not 'one percent', by the way) basically within the range of statistical error? Couldn't those 'poor people' just be a few more university students living on ramen noodles, pretty contendedly? Isn't going to university a good thing? How do we measure this whole 'poverty' thing anyway?"

Obviously I don't work there anymore. (I still don't understand the poverty measurement. My mother and I discovered to our amazement, watching the local news one day, that we lived "below the poverty line." She had a low paying job and we weren't on welfare, but we always had a full fridge, nice furniture and clothes. Guess it helped that my mother wasn't a chain smoking drunk -- I did that on my own dime, later in life...)

But I still live in Toronto, and it's Thanksgiving, which means I have to listen to constant b.s. from the poverty industry, telling me I need to donate tins of tuna to the local food bank because "900,000 Torontonians" rely on the food banks.

In a city of 3,000,000, tops. Journalists and social workers both suck at math.

No one I know uses food banks. No one THEY know uses food banks. It is a common feature of human nature to think that invisible "other people" must be suffering even though my neighbours and I are pretty much cool. The people I've heard about who do spend all their government cheque money on beer then go to the food bank, or dress up as poor people to scam the Daily Bread.

Neither of these types of people are poor.

However, freedom of speech is at risk, the right to private property is not enshrined in our Constitution, Jamaican hoodlums shoot each other in after hours clubs, Muslims want special bathrooms and reading gay fairy tales to kids is totally cool!

That's why I don't care about the poor. They're no more real than Bigfoot. Those we and these lefty Christians call "poor" are "poor" because they've made a series of stupid choices; spend all their (actually, my) money on lottery tickets, beer, tattoos and manicures; are suffering from undiagnosed but easily treated mental illnesses; had too many kids too young; smoked behind the gym while I spent recess in the library, etc etc etc.

I grew up with them. They were jerks and losers. (Believe me, innocent Lefty Christians: you haven't met real "racists" and "sexists" and "homephobes" until you've spent time with the "poor.")

Jesus said "the poor will always be with you" and all the crooked exegesis on earth can't make that line read "you are ordered by Me to eliminate poverty forever using dubious economic theories and your own stubborn yet puny human will power."

Jesus told us to love the poor because he realized it was so damn hard to do. And the poor in His day were REALLY poor. They had no choices, no upward mobility, no capitalism, no education. The Western poor haven't been in that situation for a long time. This isn't Dickensian England. As a matter of fact, I see plenty of irony-deficient so-called poor people shuffling through the big box store, loading up on "cute" "Dickensian England" inspired Christmas decorations  (along with bulk bags of chips and other junk ).

Those well-intentioned lefties at their big "immanentize the eschaton" conference have NO clue what they're getting themselves into. Ungrateful poor people are a corrosive on the average heart. Only the saints can endure them and I guarantee there are even fewer saints abroad in the land than poor folks. As well, (as we saw in Katrina) today's so-called poor, with their dependent/entitlement/victim mentality, are a threat to national security.

In ten years the Christian Left will hold another conference. They'll call it "Where Did We Go Wrong?"

UPDATE: not much hate mail, but it's early yet...

Hate mail is fun!

"What a hateful f*cking c*nt you are! I wouldn't p*ss on you if you were in flames. Drop f*cking dead. Very truly yours...", writes dabston@yahoo.com

Same stuff over at this blog, where angry lefties substitute unimaginative synonyms for "bitch" and Psych 101 jargon for actual facts and arguments.

No one disputes any of the statistics I linked to, because they didn't read the articles. In typical fashion, they merely quote me (and Steyn) then go, "See!"

Well yeah, you'd be surprised at how many people do "see" that the poverty industry is b.s.:

Chait Doesn't Just Hate Bush: Loathes Lower Taxes, Too--God forbid you keep more of what is yours...

Hillary, Soros, Alinsky, and Rush

Hillary's poisoned poster child (quadruple OOOPS)

A Tale Of Two Tongues

Welcome to the Nanny State-- An Interview

Coming for the Children

 THE FIFTY BEST BREASTS IN MOVIE HISTORY

The Counterfeiters: Hitler's last gamble (Film)

400,000 people, and no media? [MSM sedulously ignores Folsom Street Fair]

Sheriff Joe Arpaio reacts to other agencies not enforcing immigration law

Ex-Mexico Prez: Racists Stop Immigration

NorCal Farmers: 'We Don't Have Enough Workers, Produce May Rot In Fields'--Speaking as someone who’s lived at the bottom end of life in CA...I’ll tell you flat out, there’s plenty folk would love to earn what those illegals earn in the fields, but if you dont speak spanish, you damn well better not even think of applying of a slot on one of the crews. This might seem inconceivable to "progressives" and many Republicans, but what you say is absolutely 100% true.

Video: John F. Kennedy and The Shah of Iran (Great leader of Persian History)

Top 1% Pay More Income Tax Than Bottom 90%

Thompson's AWFUL Busy for Being So Lazy


7,693 posted on 10/09/2007 4:57:20 AM PDT by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
 
 
http://www.baltimorereporter.com/?p=4535
 
KOS Upset That We Dare To Question “Poor” SCHIP Kid
Filed under: — Robert Farrow @ 8:47 pm

Crossposted from Flopping Aces

Oh my, the liberals are in an uproar that we are daring…DARING…to call bulls&%t on this SCHIP family the Democrats pulled out of their hat this last weekend.  My favorite comment on this KOS post sums it up:

Yes, they better not have a “high net worth value” before our society decides to assist them with anything for their kids healthcare bills. Bills that by my estimates most likely would be in the hundreds and hundreds of thousands and that might also result in the bankruptcy of even the most average middle class family that possessed health insurance coverage. Yup, the family should have been forced to suffer more (despite the fact the kids are lucky to be alive and will have lifelong issues to deal with from the TBI’s they sustained).

Yes, these people should be forced to suffer and struggle some more….they should have had to sell their small family business and been forced to give up the breadwinner’s income (and he should go work at McWal-mart) …because that is what a humane society insists upon before they provide them with healthcare assistance. Yup and they should have been forced to sell and move out of their house (that had most likely risen in value subtantially like most homes over the past decade did due to the housing bubble)and sold their granite counter tops and been forced to moved into a Section 8 funded apartment because gawd forbid they better most certainly be struggling before those kids and this family were aided by our American society in any way shape or form. That’s the spirit….the American way.

I’m sorry if I sound angry and sarcastic here, (because I am after reading this post)….but perhaps you just don’t fully understand just what this family went through. I have no personal knowledge of this family, but worked in a TBI rehab unit for many years….and it is one of those traumatic medical issues that can just devastate and rip apart people and their families in many many ways and not always just financially.

Well how about this instead Einstein.  The family buys insurance at a cost of 400-500 bucks a month instead of buying that SUV, instead of buying those granite counter tops, instead of putting their kids into private school, instead of remodeling their house.  That way the insurance then covers the hundreds of thousands of dollars in bills and TA-DA, problem solved.

This is just another Mary Ann Knowles:

Another Winifred Skinner:

Or Jennifer Bush:

UPDATE

Mark Steyn:


7,694 posted on 10/09/2007 5:21:41 AM PDT by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Mark Tapscott:And wouldn't it be wonderful if all journalists would greet all claims by all politicians and advocates with a healthy dose of Mencken-esque skepticism - i.e. as requiring verification before publication?"

Update IV: Mark Tapscott at Tapscott's Copy Desk writes of his experience as a journalist and notes the decline of healthy skepticism in journalism today:

When I first started working with and among journalists in the mid-1970s, there was still enough of the old school skepticism in the ranks that I quickly learned a good reporter always assumed there was more to a story than was being told by any one participant in it, which meant you had to keep digging and asking, digging and asking, to get all of the facts.

Put otherwise, you had to have a healthy skepticism about everything you were told by politicians, office-holders and public policy advocates across the entire political spectrum. But I see less and less of that kind of healthy skepticism among journalists when it comes to claims and conduct by Democrats and liberal activists.

Increasingly, getting the whole story about an issue in public policy these days starts with the Blogosphere because to a growing extent that is where you find educated skepticism and a willingness to dig for the facts.

Indeed.

 
The Hedgehog Report: "Which One Of Edwards’ America Do They Live In?"
 
Prairie Pundit: "It is surprising that Democrats would show so much compassion for small business. Perhaps they can offer the Frosts' a tax cut with which they can buy their own health insurance."
 
And yes, I did a pretty darn snarky new post about this.
 
http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2007/10/schip-remember-that-12-year-old.html
 

SCHIP: Remember that 12 year old the Democrats used?

How many times can the Democrats publicly embarrass themselves?

Background:

SCHIP Bill can be found here. We showed the Fact vs Myth again just yesterday here and how the politicians thought the public was too stupid to see the misrepresentations in the bill.

The president said he would veto the bill.

From the White House website.

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning.

Today I am signing emergency legislation to fund the Federal government for the next seven weeks. This legislation was necessary because Congress failed in its most basic responsibility: to pass the spending bills that fund the day-to-day operations of the government. There are 12 of these bills this year, and Congress did not complete a single one of them, so Congress had to send me a stop-gap measure before the fiscal year ends this Sunday at midnight.

Congress's failure to pass these 12 spending bills is disappointing, but I do thank the Congress for passing this temporary measure, and for passing it without any new spending, new policies or new projects. It would have been wrong to deny essential government services to the American people while Congress works through its annual spending bills.

I also appreciate the way this bill handles our disagreements over the State Children's Health Insurance Program. Congressional leaders have put forward an irresponsible plan that would dramatically expand this program beyond its original intent. And they know I will veto it. But it is good that they kept the program running while they try to work out a more responsible approach.

Congress now has more time to complete its work on its annual spending bills. Earlier this year congressional leaders promised to show that they could be responsible with the people's money. Unfortunately they seem to have chosen the path of higher spending. They have proposed spending increases that would add an extra $205 billion on top of my Administration's budget request over the next five years. There's only one way to pay for such a large spending increase, and that is to raise taxes on the American people. So it is no surprise that the same Members of Congress who are planning this big increase in Federal spending are also planning the biggest tax increase in American history.

If these members get their way, the tax relief my Administration delivered could be taken away from you. Let me explain what this would mean for an average taxpayer. If you have children, your taxes would rise by $500 for each child. If you're a family of four making $60,000 a year, your taxes would be more than $1,800 higher. If you're a single mother with two children, working to make ends meet, your taxes would go up by more than a $1,000. If you're a small business owner working to meet a payroll, your taxes would increase by almost $4,000. And if Congress allows our tax relief to expire, more than 5 million low-income Americans who currently pay no income taxes would once again have to pay taxes.

These are not the only taxes Congress wants to raise. They're proposing higher taxes on dividends and capital gains. They're proposing higher taxes on cigars and cigarettes. They're proposing to raise taxes on domestic oil and natural gas production. They're proposing new taxes on stock and bond transactions. And they refuse to make the Internet tax moratorium permanent. If this tax ban expires, it would open the doors for State and local officials to impose new taxes on your access to the Internet.

At a time when many American families are dealing with rising mortgage rates, college costs, and health care expenses, it is wrong to take even more money out of your paychecks. Washington's elected leaders can do better. By working together, we can keep taxes low, help keep the economy growing, balance the Federal budget, and build on our record of fiscal discipline and greater economic opportunity for all Americans.

Thank you for listening.

END


The Democrats response shows they are not above using children for their political points. LITERALLY.

Then he did veto this bad bill, which instead of fixing the existing problems in the original bill, decided to expand it and create even more problems.

Caught up? Good.

Which brings us to the Democratic embarrassment of the day.

Here is the "poor" 12 yr olds response to the President's Radio Address listed above, given before the actual veto.

TWELVE-YEAR-OLD CHIP PARTICIPANT ASKS PRESIDENT TO SIGN CHILDREN’S HEALTH RENEWAL INTO LAW

Washington, DC—Graeme Frost, 12, delivers this week’s Democratic Radio Address. Because of the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), Graeme was able to get the medical care he needed after a serious car accident caused severe brain trauma, paralyzed one of his vocal chords and put him in a coma. He asks President Bush to sign into law the renewal of CHIP that both houses of Congress passed this week with broad bipartisan support.

The text of the radio address, as delivered, is below:

“Hi, my name is Graeme Frost. I’m 12 years old and I live in Baltimore, Maryland. Most kids my age probably haven’t heard of CHIP, the Children’s Health Insurance Program. But I know all about it, because if it weren’t for CHIP, I might not be here today.

“CHIP is a law the government made to help families like mine afford healthcare for their kids. Three years ago, my family was in a really bad car accident. My younger sister Gemma and I were both hurt. I was in a coma for a week and couldn’t eat or stand up or even talk at first. My sister was even worse. I was in the hospital for five-and-a-half months and I needed a big surgery. For a long time after that, I had to go to physical therapy after school to get stronger. But even though I was hurt badly, I was really lucky. My sister and I both were.

“My parents work really hard and always make sure my sister and I have everything we need, but the hospital bills were huge. We got the help we needed because we had health insurance for us through the CHIP program.

“But there are millions of kids out there who don’t have CHIP, and they wouldn’t get the care that my sister and I did if they got hurt. Their parents might have to sell their cars or their houses, or they might not be able to pay for hospital bills at all.

“Now I’m back to school. One of my vocal chords is paralyzed so I don’t talk the same way I used to. And I can’t walk or run as fast as I did. The doctors say I can’t play football any more, but I might still be able to be a coach. I’m just happy to be back with my friends.

“I don’t know why President Bush wants to stop kids who really need help from getting CHIP. All I know is I have some really good doctors. They took great care of me when I was sick, and I’m glad I could see them because of the Children’s Health Program.

“I just hope the President will listen to my story and help other kids to be as lucky as me. This is Graeme Frost, and this has been the Weekly Democratic Radio address. Thanks for listening.”


The media jumped all over that 12 yr old and his plight and his plea, but they forgot one very important thing in their desire to further the Democratic politicians agenda.... FACT CHECKING.

Bonnie Frost works for a medical publishing firm; her husband, Halsey, is a woodworker. They are raising their four children on combined income of about $45,000 a year. Neither gets health insurance through work.


Once again, that was left up to bloggers, in this instance, someone from Free Republic (Hat Tip to The Corner) started digging, something the media as well as the Democrats didn't bother to do, obviously.

What the article does not mention is that Halsey Frost has owned his own company "Frostworks",since this marriage announcement in the NY Times in 1992 so he chooses to not give himself insurance. He also employed his wife as "bookkeeper and operations management" prior to her recent 2007 hire at the "medical publishing firm". As her employer, he apparently denied her health insurance as well.

His company, Frostworks, is located at 3701 E BALTIMORE ST. A building that was purchased for $160,000 in 1999. The buildings owner is listed as DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIAL DESIGN CENTER, LLC whose mailing address is listed as 104 S Collington Ave which is the Frost's home. The commercial property he owns is also listed as the business address for another company called Reillys Designs which leads to the question of whether rental income is included in the above mentioned salary total

The current market value of their improved 3,040 SF home at 104 S Collington Ave is unknown but 113 S COLLINGTON AVE, also an end unit, sold for $485,000 this past March and it was only 2,060 SF. A photo taken in the family's kitchen shows what appears to be a recent remodeling job with granite counter tops and glass front cabinets

One has to wonder that if time and money can be found to remodel a home, send kids to exclusive private schools, purchase commercial property and run your own business... maybe money can be found for other things...maybe Dad should drop his woodworking hobby and get a real job that offers health insurance rather than making people like me (also with 4 kids in a 600sf smaller house and tuition $16,000 less per kid and no commercial property ownership) pay for it in my taxes.



OUCH.

Pretty much proves the points I made yesterday about the bill, instead of needing to expand the people and income levels made allowable, they needed to fix it so it will cover low income families (as it was created to do) and not higher income families that CAN afford private health coverage, but choose not to, so that they can mooch off the government (meaning those of us that pay taxes).

A question about the Frost family:

So with a yearly income of a "supposed" $45,000, and two kids going to a $20,000 a year school, per child, how are they living off of the remaining $5,000 a year....hell that doesn't even cover food for a family of six (correction made) for a full year... maybe someone should check what other "public", government programs they are receiving money from.

You do not have to be a math wiz to figure out that the numbers do not add up.

Some reactions from around the web include but are not limited to;

Don Surber:

This business of “affordable insurance” is socialistic. The Frosts found an “affordable” business building and an “affordable” 3,000-square foot house and an “affordable” private school. Why couldn’t these yuppies afford to cover their own damned kids?


Brutally Honest:

Of course they do... this while the Religious Left attempt to sell Bush's veto of the bill as "Morally Unacceptable".

An incredible bit of chutzpah on the part of the Left in this country... and in the mean-time, Bush is talking about compromise on the bill. Amazing. But one can understand wilting under the constant barrage of criticism.

Bush's political machine needs to get the message out that when the government is spending money on those who really don't need the help, the truly needy are passed over.

And that friends, is what's unequivocally morally unacceptable.


The Corner:

Mr Frost, the "woodworker", owns his own design company and the commercial property it operates from, part of which space he also rents out; they have a 3,000-sq-ft home on a street where a 2,000-sq-ft home recently sold for half a million dollars; he was able to afford to send two children simultaneously to a $20,000-a-year private school; his father and grandfather were successful New York designers and architects; etc. This is apparently the new definition of "working families"


Wizbang:

First, Mr. Halsey Frost, Graeme's father, owns his own woodworking design studio, Frostworks, so his claim that he can't get health insurance through work is shockingly deceptive. He chooses not to get health care for his family. Second, Graeme and his sister Gemma attend the very exclusive Park School, which has a tuition of $20,000 a year, per child. Third, they live in a 3,000+ square foot home in a neighborhood with smaller homes that are selling for at least $400,000.

Yet, hardworking taxpayers who sacrifice many things such as expensive private schools and expensive houses in order to buy their own health care for their families are supposed to subsidize this family's health insurance premiums.



ShotGun Blog:

In other words – taking into account the value of the home, the value of the father’s business, the value of the commercial property they own, and so forth minus their mortgage and whatever they might owe on the commercial property (and other sundry debts) an educated guess would suggest that this family has a net worth of somewhere in the neighbourhood of $500,000.

And they want the rest of the American people to foot their bill for their health care?



Blue Crab Boulevard:

Why in the world do these people need SCHIP? And how does a $45,000 a year reported income manage to send two kids at once to a $20,000 a year private school? This is a blatant fraud by the Democrats and easily checked. So why in the world did they do this? And what the heck is wrong with the media? They look like utter fools here. They have been rolled and rolled badly. If I was the reporter or the editor, I'd about have smoke coming out my my ears about now.


Protein Wisdom:

I’m glad little Graham and his family were able to get help, and I hope he reaches full rehabilitation. But perhaps the Democrats ought to take more care in the spokespeople they choose, if they wish to tug at our heartstrings.


With all the reactions from the bloggers I see at memeorandum, you know what is missing?

Liberal blogs.

They are eerily quiet about this so far.... probably trying to figure out how to "spin" their way out of the fact that they jumped on the Democrats 12 yr old bandwagon without bothering to do any fact checking for themselves. (Those are just a few examples of how the left leaning blogs automatically assumed that the Frost family needed the SCHIP program and deserved it, simply because the Democratic politicians said so)

Once again the Democrats and their far left liberal supporters manage to embarrass themselves while attempting to embarrass the administration.

Backfired once again.


Tracked back by:
Democratic SCHIP Bull...Lies and Distortions from Miss Beth's Victory Dance...

7,695 posted on 10/09/2007 6:25:40 AM PDT by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Did I Really Start A Firestorm in Washington?--I had no idea my post about the family used by democrats to push for expansion of the S-CHIP program would cause such a stir.
They got caught red-handed...
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
 
More-- about "S-Chip"--

Walberg Rejects The Smear

Tim Walberg, the staunch fiscal conservative and freshman Republican Representative from Michigan, writes about the deceitful campaign waged by Democrats on behalf of the S-CHIP expansion. From country music parodies to hiding behind 12-year-old boys, the Democrats want to paint opponents as heartless Scrooges who want to see kids go without health care. Walberg writes about the way S-CHIP gets applied in Michigan, and we find out that it's not just about kids, or even primarily about them:

I support renewing S-CHIP to provide health care to children in low-income families, but I also believe we need to ensure that the children’s health program is available for children who need it, and not for adults, people who enter the country illegally, or families who already have private insurance.

The Democratic legislation takes a program originally meant for children of low-income families and expands it to cover some families earning up to $83,000 and illegal immigrants, while moving millions of children from private health insurance to government programs.

In 2006, 118,501 children and 101,919 adults in Michigan received health care from the S-CHIP program. Incredibly, this means that 46 percent of Michigan’s funding allotment intended to give poor children health insurance actually went to cover adults.

The Wall Street Journal further described this problem in its August 9 editorial: “The bill goes so far as to offer increasing ‘bonus payments’ to states as they enroll more people in their SCHIP programs. To grease the way, the bill re-labels children’ as anyone under 25, and ‘low income’ as up to… $82,600 for a family of four.”

That split tells a large story about S-CHIP and its upper limit of 25, far beyond what anyone considers childhood. If 46% of S-CHIP payouts went to subsidize health insurance for adults before the expansion, what will be the percentage afterwards? Even without this expansion, the S-CHIP program has already suffered from a serious case of mission creep.

The federal government should not be subsidizing health insurance for adults, let alone middle-class children. Adults can make their own choices, as can families who own commercial property and have over $400,000 in home equity. Walberg wants to renew the program as it was initially designed, not as another government entitlement that will trap the government into more non-discretionary spending while we still can't solve the economic consequences of the entitlement spending to which we are already committed.

This stopped being about poor kids when the Democrats tried to expand the program into the middle class. It stopped being about kids altogether when almost half of the subsidies went to adults rather than children. It's clear that S-CHIP needs more control, not more expansion, and that the Democrats want to use it to make people more dependent on the dole.

 
New bird flu strain dangerous to humans
 
Big Media Ignores San Francisco Folsom Event
 
Miller Brewery Funds Gay Sadomasochistic Orgy *WARNING*
 

Clinton Legacy
http://prorev.com/legacy.htm

Clinton Legacy

Hillary Offers Little Change to Bush's Policies

It's Revival Time for the Democrats [Rats Get Religion--Pruden column]--Overnight, they morph from trying to criminalize God to constantly invoking Scripture and explaining how they’ve always been a God fan in every aspect of life.

Liberals Send The Truth Up In Smoke

The American Dream turns into a debtor's nightmare--This has got to be a joke...where in the hell is sympathy for a $9.00 an hour Mexican glass cutter who can't speak English borrowing the entire purchase price of $615,000 from Washington Mutual?.

Sarkozy speechwriter 'racist' (suggested Africa may have caused some of it's own problems)

Unions Frantic: Will School Choice Referendum Prevail in Utah?

Denial of bond for illegal aliens pondered by (GA) lawmakers

Boxer amendment would block immigration enforcement

Stop, thief! OnStar will brake stolen cars

New Fire-Retardant Gel Can Save Homes

Spy Flies All the Buzz at Washington, N.Y. Political Events

Winter seen warmer than normal (NOAA predicts - Place your bets and Get ready to bundle up!)


7,696 posted on 10/09/2007 12:22:40 PM PDT by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Fourth Generation Warfare Evolves, Fifth Emerges
 
IBD is producing editorials like the WSJ used to:
 
Guns And Butter: A Primer
 
What's Tax 'Fairness'?--The problem with the federal government lies in its transformation over the decades from an institution providing a common defense and maintaining common infrastructure into an institution that simply robs Peter to pay Paul.
 
Not by Fire but by Ice ----- THE NEXT ICE AGE - NOW!
 
The Truth About SCHIP Shortfalls--There is no authority granted for FedGov to be in the health biz, the education biz, the energy or transportation biz, either.
 
Democrat poster-child abuse, the nutroots’ pushback, and the continued campaign to silence the Right
 
Leftist and Democrats Threaten Michelle Malkin With Death for Reporting on their Sham
 
WANT FREE HEALTH CARE - MOVE TO CANADA AND YOU CAN EXPECT THE FOLLOWING:
 
Gimme Shelter

http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?s=57a43b05733bba883962e252dd7c54e9&t=260344

GOV/MIL - Have you heard about all the dead Republican congressmen?

Who made these statements? (Hillary did)

 
Hillary, Soros, Alinsky, and Rush
 
Good piece at American Thinker about the genesis of this type of propaganda. Here is a primer on Alinsky’s Rules. The political formula is Hegel + Marx + Gramsci + Alinsky = Clinton.
 

Hillary Spoke At Wellesley Due To Pal’s Threats

October 9th, 2007

From the hallowed archives of (the then women-only) Wellesley College:

1969 Student Commencement Speech

Hillary D. Rodham
May 31, 1969

Ruth M. Adams, ninth president of Wellesley College, introduced Hillary D. Rodham, ‘69, at the 91st commencement exercises, as follows:

In addition to inviting Senator Brooke to speak to them this morning, the Class of ‘69 has expressed a desire to speak to them and for them at this morning’s commencement. There was no debate so far as I could ascertain as to who their spokesman was to be — Miss Hillary Rodham. Member of this graduating class, she is a major in political science and a candidate for the degree with honors.

In four years she has combined academic ability with active service to the College, her junior year having served as a Vil Junior, and then as a member of Senate and during the past year as President of College Government and presiding officer of College Senate. She is also cheerful, good humored, good company, and a good friend to all of us and it is a great pleasure to present to this audience Miss Hillary Rodham.

Remarks of Hillary D. Rodham, President of the Wellesley College Government Association and member of the Class of 1969, on the occasion of Wellesley’s 91st Commencement, May 31, 1969:

I am very glad that Miss Adams made it clear that what I am speaking for today is all of us — the 400 of us — and I find myself in a familiar position, that of reacting, something that our generation has been doing for quite a while now. We’re not in the positions yet of leadership and power, but we do have that indispensable task of criticizing and constructive protest and I find myself reacting just briefly to some of the things that Senator Brooke said.

This has to be brief because I do have a little speech to give. Part of the problem with empathy with professed goals is that empathy doesn’t do us anything. We’ve had lots of empathy; we’ve had lots of sympathy, but we feel that for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible.

What does it mean to hear that 13.3% of the people in this country are below the poverty line? That’s a percentage. We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction. How can we talk about percentages and trends? The complexities are not lost in our analyses, but perhaps they’re just put into what we consider a more human and eventually a more progressive perspective. The question about possible and impossible was one that we brought with us to Wellesley four years ago. We arrived not yet knowing what was not possible. Consequently, we expected a lot.

Our attitudes are easily understood having grown up, having come to consciousness in the first five years of this decade — years dominated by men with dreams, men in the civil rights movement, the Peace Corps, the space program — so we arrived at Wellesley and we found, as all of us have found, that there was a gap between expectation and realities. But it wasn’t a discouraging gap and it didn’t turn us into cynical, bitter old women at the age of 18. It just inspired us to do something about that gap. What we did is often difficult for some people to understand.

They ask us quite often: “Why, if you’re dissatisfied, do you stay in a place?” Well, if you didn’t care a lot about it you wouldn’t stay. It’s almost as though my mother used to say, “I’ll always love you but there are times when I certainly won’t like you.” Our love for this place, this particular place, Wellesley College, coupled with our freedom from the burden of an inauthentic reality allowed us to question basic assumptions underlying our education.

Before the days of the media orchestrated demonstrations, we had our own gathering over in Founder’s parking lot. We protested against the rigid academic distribution requirement. We worked for a pass-fail system. We worked for a say in some of the process of academic decision making. And luckily we were in a place where, when we questioned the meaning of a liberal arts education there were people with enough imagination to respond to that questioning. So we have made progress.

We have achieved some of the things that initially saw as lacking in that gap between expectation and reality. Our concerns were not, of course, solely academic as all of us know. We worried about inside Wellesley questions of admissions, the kind of people that should be coming to Wellesley, the process for getting them here. We questioned about what responsibility we should have both for our lives as individuals and for our lives as members of a collective group.

Coupled with our concerns for the Wellesley inside here in the community were our concerns for what happened beyond Hathaway House. We wanted to know what relationship Wellesley was going to have to the outer world. We were lucky in that one of the first things Miss Adams did was to set up a cross-registration with MIT because everyone knows that education just can’t have any parochial bounds any more.

One of the other things that we did was the Upward Bound program. There are so many other things that we could talk about; so many attempts, at least the way we saw it, to pull ourselves into the world outside. And I think we’ve succeeded. There will be an Upward Bound program, just for one example, on the campus this summer.

Many of the issues that I’ve mentioned — those of sharing power and responsibility, those of assuming power and responsibility have been general concerns on campuses throughout the world. But underlying those concerns there is a theme, a theme which is so trite and so old because the words are so familiar. It talks about integrity and trust and respect.

Words have a funny way of trapping our minds on the way to our tongues but there are necessary means even in this multi-media age for attempting to come to grasps with some of the inarticulate maybe even inarticulable things that we’re feeling. We are, all of us, exploring a world that none of us even understands and attempting to create within that uncertainty. But there are some things we feel, feelings that our prevailing, acquisitive, and competitive corporate life, including tragically the universities, is not the way of life for us. We’re searching for more immediate, ecstatic and penetrating mode of living.

And so our questions, our questions about our institutions, about our colleges, about our churches, about our government continue. The questions about those institutions are familiar to all of us. We have seen heralded across the newspapers. Senator Brooke has suggested some of them this morning. But along with using these words — integrity, trust, and respect — in regard to institutions and leaders we’re perhaps harshest with them in regard to ourselves.

Every protest, every dissent, whether it’s an individual academic paper, Founder’s parking lot demonstration, is unabashedly an attempt to forge an identity in this particular age. That attempt at forging for many of us over the past four years has meant coming to terms with our humanness.

Within the context of a society that we perceive — now we can talk about reality, and I would like to talk about reality sometime, authentic reality, inauthentic reality, and what we have to accept of what we see — but our perception of it is that it hovers often between the possibility of disaster and the potentiality for imaginatively responding to men’s needs.

There’s a very strange conservative strain that goes through a lot of New Left, collegiate protests that I find very intriguing because it harkens back to a lot of the old virtues, to the fulfillment of original ideas. And it’s also a very unique American experience. It’s such a great adventure. If the experiment in human living doesn’t work in this country, in this age, it’s not going to work anywhere.

But we also know that to be educated, the goal of it must be human liberation. A liberation enabling each of us to fulfill our capacity so as to be free to create within and around ourselves. To be educated to freedom must be evidenced in action, and here again is where we ask ourselves, as we have asked our parents and our teachers, questions about integrity, trust, and respect. Those three words mean different things to all of us.

Some of the things they can mean, for instance: Integrity, the courage to be whole, to try to mold an entire person in this particular context, living in relation to one another in the full poetry of existence. If the only tool we have ultimately to use is our lives, so we use it in the way we can by choosing a way to live that will demonstrate the way we feel and the way we know. Integrity — a man like Paul Santmire.

Trust. This is one word that when I asked the class at our rehearsal what it was they wanted me to say for them, everyone came up to me and said “Talk about trust, talk about the lack of trust both for us and the way we feel about others. Talk about the trust bust.” What can you say about it? What can you say about a feeling that permeates a generation and that perhaps is not even understood by those who are distrusted? All they can do is keep trying again and again and again. There’s that wonderful line in East Coker by Eliot about there’s only the trying, again and again and again; to win again what we’ve lost before.

And then respect. There’s that mutuality of respect between people where you don’t see people as percentage points. Where you don’t manipulate people. Where you’re not interested in social engineering for people. The struggle for an integrated life existing in an atmosphere of communal trust and respect is one with desperately important political and social consequences.

And the word “consequences” of course catapults us into the future. One of the most tragic things that happened yesterday, a beautiful day, was that I was talking to woman who said that she wouldn’t want to be me for anything in the world. She wouldn’t want to live today and look ahead to what it is she sees because she’s afraid. Fear is always with us but we just don’t have time for it. Not now.

There are two people that I would like to thank before concluding. That’s Ellie Acheson, who is the spearhead for this, and also Nancy Scheibner who wrote this poem which is the last thing that I would like to read:

My entrance into the world of so-called “social problems”
Must be with quiet laughter, or not at all.
The hollow men of anger and bitterness
The bountiful ladies of righteous degradation
All must be left to a bygone age.
And the purpose of history is to provide a receptacle
For all those myths and oddments
Which oddly we have acquired
And from which we would become unburdened
To create a newer world
To transform the future into the present.
We have no need of false revolutions
In a world where categories tend to tyrannize our minds
And hang our wills up on narrow pegs.
It is well at every given moment to seek the limits in our lives.
And once those limits are understood
To understand that limitations no longer exist.
Earth could be fair. And you and I must be free
Not to save the world in a glorious crusade
Not to kill ourselves with a nameless gnawing pain
But to practice with all the skill of our being
The art of making possible.

The Ellie Acheson mentioned is Eleanor “Eldie” Acheson was Hillary’s roommate for all four years at Wellesley. She is a longtime supporter and close friend of Hillary’s.

As the speech graciously notes, it was Eldie who pressured the president of Wellesley, Ruth Adams, to let Hillary be the first student in the history of the school to deliver a speech at graduation.

From “Her Way: The Hopes and Ambitions of Hillary Rodham Clinton,” by Jeff Gerth and Don van Natta, Jr., pp 34-7:

The Art of Making Possible

ALL THAT WAS LEFT was graduation from Wellesley, which Hillary assumed would be uneventful — an assessment that turned out to be far off the mark. A classmate and friend, Eleanor “Eldie” Acheson, the granddaughter of Dean Acheson, President Truman’s secretary of state, had the idea that a student should address the graduating class at commencement for the first time in the college’s history. Wellesley president Ruth Adams quickly rejected the proposal.

Acheson refused to take no for an answer, however, declaring that she would stage a counter-commencement that weekend and that she was certain her famous grandfather would attend. Hillary, as student government president, was summoned to see President Adams in her house on the shore of Lake Waban on campus.

“What is the real objection?” Hillary asked.

“It’s never been done,” Adams replied.

“Well, we could give it a try.”

“We don’t know whom they are going to ask to speak,” Adams said.

“Well,” Hillary said, “they asked me to speak.”

“I’ll think about it.”

Adams finally approved the request, probably relying on her faith in Hillary…

Her speech was greeted with a standing ovation from her classmates, but President Adams was deeply disappointed with the message, and especially with Hillary’s spontaneous decision to rebut comments by the official commencement speaker. It was, she thought, disrespectful.

Later that day, Hillary said good-bye to Wellesley by breaking its rules. She jumped into Lake Waban near her dorm, an area where swimming was strictly forbidden. She left her cut-off jeans, T-shirt, and aviator-style sunglasses on the shore. “I didn’t have a care in the world as I swam out toward the middle, and because of my nearsightedness, my surroundings looked like an Impressionist painting.”

When she returned to the shore, her clothes and glasses were missing. A campus security guard told Hillary that President Adams had seen Hillary swimming from her house and ordered them confiscated.

It may have provoked President Adams’s ire, but her speech nevertheless attracted national attention. Highlights from it, as well as her photograph [above], appeared in the June 1969 issue of Life magazine. and she gave an interview to a Chicago TV station. Hillary’s mother basked in the media attention lavished on her only saying she had heard the full gamut of reactions, from salutations like “she spoke for a generation” to criticism like “who does she think she is?”

The accolades and attacks,” Hillary later reflected, “turned out preview of things to come.

Ms. Acheson is a lawyer who was a liaison to the gay community for presidential candidate John Kerry. Before that she served in the Justice Department as the Assistant Attorney General for Policy Development under Janet Reno during the Clinton administration.

She is the founding Director of Public Policy and Government Affairs for the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. Ms. Acheson also finds the time to head the Lesbian Gay Bi-Sexual Transgendered Americans For Hillary Steering Committee.

In addition to inviting Senator Brooke to speak to them this morning, the Class of ‘69 has expressed a desire to speak to them and for them at this morning’s commencement. There was no debate so far as I could ascertain as to who their spokesman was to be — Miss Hillary Rodham.

And so Ms. Rodham’s brilliant political career began, with a cringing coward papering over a threat from one of Hillary’s first (but far from last) bullying henchmen.

That’s Hillary’s “art of making possible.”

9 Comments »
 
Author says: Alberta oil thirst leading to disaster
 
From The Home Office In The Ministry Of Truth

Randall Hoven has assembled a tremendous list (in alphabetical order) of the top 101 lies and misinformation from the elite media and related figures. He calls it "Media Dishonesty Matters", and I recommend reading it to everyone, since we're all consumers of news and opinion in one form or another. Upon first glance, I just have one minor quibble. Included in Hoven's list is this incident from the 2004 presidential election:

92. Evan Thomas, Newsweek (2004). Admitted bias. Thomas said, "Let's talk a little media bias here. The media, I think, wants Kerry to win. ... They're going to portray Kerry and Edwards as being young and dynamic and optimistic and there's going to be this glow about them ... that's going to be worth maybe 15 points."
Unless you actually do believe the legacy media is unbiased (an impossibility in my book, for reasons I go into here), then I'm don't believe that Thomas should be faulted for admitting the truth about his profession, which jibes perfectly with all of the studies that have been taken regarding their voting habits.
 
 
 
 
 

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

 
 
 
 
-more--
BlogWarZ...heh™
 

Y2Kyoto: An Inconvenient Court Case

"Here's something American media are virtually guaranteed to not report: a British court has determined that Al Gore's schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth" contains at least eleven material falsehoods."
Posted by Kate at 1:25 AM | Comments (6)
 

"Interpol photo unscrambling raises privacy questions"

Captac21ce9336844c72907d59a557d6aa4

How, exactly?

"Maybe it's just me, but if you are putting things on the internet that demand the scrambling of people's faces, maybe the problem is lack of judgment."

You don't say.
Posted by Kate at 12:21 AM | Comments (2)
A LOOK AT PHOTO-UNSCRAMBLING TECHNOLOGY and its implications for privacy.
 
RED LIGHT CAMERAS: Literal money machines! "They say a picture is worth a thousand words, but in Albuquerque pictures of traffic violators are worth $10 million, according to an audit which renews the debate over excessive fines."
 
Olbermann refers to FR as the "lunatic, fringe website" and it's members "the group of sociopaths"--Don't you love it when liberals inadvertantly describe themselves on public TV?
 
 

I'M STUCK AT THE AIRPORT but Pajamas Media is covering the Republican debate. And Stephen Green is liveblogging.

UPDATE: Still stuck. But there's more at The Corner.

MORE: Stephen Green, above, didn't seem very impressed with Fred's performance but Emily Zanotti reports: "The general feeling around here is that Fred Thompson pulled out a narrow win over Rudy and McCain, though a few hardcore Mitt supporters are attributing that to low expectations. I have to disagree. Mitt looked scripted, and even if it was calculated, Fred looked free and easy by comparison, and stayed consistently on message."

Plus, comments here, including Mitt Romney's startling handsomeness, and missed opportunity re Scalia.

 
Permalink Thompson did well for his first time out. He was excellent on taxes, patiently explaining that the wealth of government isn't the same thing as the wealth of nations. And he was very effective on Iraq, pointing out that Saddam Hussein almost certainly would have reconstituted his nuclear program in the context of a soon-to-be-nuclear Iran. At other times, Thompson was uninspiring at best, as in his rambling answer about how Republicans can regain the voters' trust on economic issues. Thompson needs to become more consistently sharp, and he probably will. However, he looks old, and I don't thnk there's much he can do about that. Will this be a problem for him? Beats me.
-more-- Posted by Ed Morrissey on October 9, 2007 5:03 PM | Comments (51) | TrackBacks (3)
 
(Video)Fred Thompson Puts Chris Matthews In His Place--Spitboy was waiting the entire debate to use that cheap line. Too bad he picked on the wrong guy.

7,697 posted on 10/10/2007 2:31:49 AM PDT by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Democrat poster-child abuse, the nutroots’ pushback, and the continued campaign to silence the Right

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 9, 2007 11:08 PM

memegraeme.jpg

I received an e-mail from a NYTimes reporter this afternoon:

Writing about blog coverage of the SCHIP debate, including scrutiny of Graeme Frost and plan to include references to your posts. Would like comment if you’re willing. Republicans on Capitol Hill are now saying they think the Frost children are legitimate recipients of CHIP coverage.

Thanks and regards,

David M. Herszenhorn
The New York Times
Congressional Correspondent

I gave him these comments:

The bottom line here is that this family has considerable assets. Maryland’ s S-CHIP program does not means-test (correction: I meant to say assets-test>. The refusal to do assets tests on federal health insurance programs is why federal entitlements are exploding and government keeps expanding. If Republicans don’t have the guts to hold the line, they deserve to lose their seats.

I also told him this:

As for accusations about “smearing” and “Swiftboating,” I’ll repeat what I said on my blog: “When a family and Democrat political leaders drag a child down to Washington at 6 in the morning to read a script written by Senate Democrat staffers on a crusade to overturn a presidential veto, someone might have questions about the family’s claims. The newspapers don’t want to do their jobs. The vacuum is being filled. If you don’t want questions, don’t foist these children onto the public stage. Fight your battles like adults and stop hiding behind youngsters dragging around red wagons filled with your talking points.”

Here’s the NYTimes story, which actually turned out much fairer and more balanced than I expected. An excerpt:

…what on the surface appears to be yet another partisan feud, all the nastier because a child is at the center of it, actually cuts to the most substantive debate around S-chip. Democrats say it is crucially needed to help the working poor — Medicaid already helps the impoverished — but many Republicans say it now helps too many people with the means to help themselves.

The feud also illustrates what can happen when politicians showcase real people to make a point, a popular but often perilous technique.

Some Republicans are too weak in the knees to engage:

Republicans on Capitol Hill, who were gearing up to use Graeme as evidence that Democrats have overexpanded the health program to include families wealthy enough to afford private insurance, have backed off, glad to let bloggers take the heat for attacking a family with injured children.

An aide to Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, expressed relief that his office had not issued a press release criticizing the Frosts.

Oh, swell. So he feels “relief” because he doesn’t have to ask the hard questions about the continued entitlement creep approved by both big government parties? Well, wipe your brow and pat yourself on the back! Crikey.

Meantime, Nancy Pelosi seems confident that those weak-kneed Republicans will roll over:

“Democrats, including the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, have risen to the Frosts’ defense, saying they earn about $45,000 a year and are precisely the type of working-poor Americans that the program was intended to help.

That’s what should concern every fiscal conservative left in Congress. And it is exactly why the Frosts’ financial situation is so germane–i.e., because Democrats are holding them out as “precisely the type of working-poor Americans that the program was intended to help.”

Dan Riehl has some questions the NYTimes didn’t get around to asking.

Now, before I get into the latest, left-wing attacks on those of us who dare to question the Democrats’ sacred political narratives, here’s my new syndicated column on Dirty Harry Reid’s poster child abuse:

A few weeks ago, Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid lured two young children to the public spotlight to help him pass a massive expansion of government health insurance. Gemma and Graeme Frost, 9 and 12 years old respectively, were severely injured in a car accident three years ago. Their parents obtained government health care through the non-meansassets-tested Children’s Health Insurance Program in Maryland. President Bush’s veto doesn’t change that. And there’s the rub.

Because liberal lawmakers cannot honestly defend their expansion plans as bona fide aid to the needy, they have surrounded themselves with the Frosts and other kiddie human shields to deflect any tough scrutiny. As they push for an override of the president’s veto, scheduled for Oct. 18, the desperate Dems will shamelessly invoke the Absolute Moral Authority kiddie card to attack their critics for “attacking the children.”

After 12-year-old Graeme Frost delivered the Democrat radio address last week, which was penned for him by Senate staffers, conservatives on the FreeRepublic.com forum and across the Internet asked the questions the mainstream media wouldn’t ask about the family’s financial situation. The couple claims an annual combined annual income of about $45,000. Neither the Democrats nor the Baltimore Sun indicate how they verified that assertion before circulating it.

What is verifiable: The Frosts own a home in Baltimore purchased for $55,000 sixteen years ago–and now worth an estimated $300,000. That’s a lot of equity. In addition, the children’s father, Halsey Frost, owns commercial real estate and his own small business, but chose not to buy health insurance for himself and his wife, whom he hired as an employee. She now apparently works freelance at a medical publishing firm, which also reportedly doesn’t offer insurance. Gemma and Graeme both attend expensive private schools; the Frosts have two other school-age children. Reid’s staff says Gemma and Graeme receive tuition breaks. But it’s not clear when those scholarships were instituted and/or whether the other two receive tuition aid as well. Moreover, Frost’s family comes from considerable means. The children’s maternal grandfather was an engineering executive. Their paternal grandparents hail from affluent Bronxville, New York, where the grandfather is a prominent facilities management consultant and chairman of the municipal planning board.

In other words: The public trough is not Halsey Frost’s last and only resort.

The accident was horrible. The children deserve much sympathy and compassion. But this family made choices. Choices have consequences. Taxpayers of lesser means should not be forced to subsidize them.

The Frosts claim it would cost them more per month than their mortgage, reportedly $1,200 a month, to buy private insurance. But insurance bloggers quickly found available plans for a family of six with premiums as low as $452/month.

“That’s almost a third of the price quoted in the [Baltimore Sun] article,” wrote Bob Vineyard at InsureBlog. “Doesn’t anyone bother to check the facts?”

When in comes to Democrat health care poster children, the answer is “No, they don’t.” Graeme and Gemma Frost are not the first political symbols to be exploited by the socialized health care pushers of the Left:

In 1996, Hillary Clinton propped up young Jennifer Bush, a seven-year-old with mystery ailments whose mother coached her to lobby for universal health care Jennifer was trotted out to present the Clintons a lucky silver dollar “to bring you good luck so everyone can have good insurance.” Jennifer’s mother was later convicted of aggravated child abuse and welfare fraud for misrepresenting $60,000 in assets on Medicaid forms.

In 2000, Al Gore propped up elderly widow Winifred Skinner to lambaste high drug prices. Gore repeated her claim that she had to pick up cans on the side of the road to pay for medicine. Dan Rather bemoaned: “She’s no child, but she belongs on a poster about high drug costs.” One problem: Winifred’s own well-to-do son, businessman Earl King, debunked those claims.

In 2004, John Kerry propped up Mary Ann Knowles, a breast cancer patient who he claimed “had to keep working day after day right through her chemotherapy, no matter how sick she felt, because she was terrified of losing her family’s health insurance?” The conservative Manchester Union Leader editorial page reported: “Knowles chose to work through most, but not all, of her chemotherapy because her husband was out of a job…She and husband John did not want to take the pay cut that would have come with disability leave, so Mary Ann kept working.”

The Democrats sorely resent that they can no longer peddle their Big Nanny propaganda unchallenged. Harry Reid is already throwing tantrums and attacking the messengers who expose their health-care poster child abuse.

Here’s a free prescription for our stunted politicians: Grow up.

The Free Republic member who first scrutinized the Frost case has a follow-up here. He concludes: “This is not a family of renters, they own not only a 3,040 SF home but a commercial property as well. I’m not faulting them for it, I’m not trying to say they are rich, I’m trying to make people aware of what types of families are CURRENTLY covered by S-CHIP so we can honestly debate if the income ceiling should be raised. Hmmmm, I really could use that new bass boat motor and the kids really would like a Nintendo Wii … maybe I’ll change my position.”

And now to the nutroots’ pushback. It’s not just Media Matters and MoveOn.org who lie through their teeth and attempt to intimidate critics through mass thuggishness. It’s militant leftist bloggers who wouldn’t know a good-faith argument if it bit them in the lip.

On Monday, I did something that has everyone from King Kos on down to the dregs (a short traveling distance, to be sure) screaming “Stalker!” What did I do? I went up to Baltimore and interviewed a tenant at health-care poster parent Halsey Frost’s place of business and drove past the Frost home. That’s not “stalking.” That’s not “harassing.” It’s reporting.

This is stalking.

Why did I take the time to go to Baltimore? Because bloggers raised questions about the Frosts’ financial situation and made specific reference to these pieces of real estate. I did not “harass” the Frosts. I simply reported what the tenant told me and described what I saw after driving by their home. My basic reporting rebutted some impressions left by other bloggers on the right who haven’t been to these sites and assumed they were high-end luxury properties. They’re not. Moreover, I corrected the mistake that some of these bloggers made in overvaluing the house at $400,000-plus. It’s closer to $300,000.

The bottom line remains:

This family made choices. Choices have consequences. Taxpayers of lesser means should not be forced to subsidize them.

The Left is so accustomed to the stenographic servitude of the MSM, it goes bananas when we fill the vacuum. Moonbat bloggers have taken to posting my personal home information again in “retaliation.”

Why? Because they want to make an example: Challenge their narratives and you will pay.

If they can redefine simple reporting as “stalking,” they’ll have their desired chilling effect.

You can’t win with the unhinged mob. If you blog from home and don’t get your ass out of your chair, you’re a navel-gazing pontificator in pajamas who’s a wannabe journalist. If you get off your ass and get out on the street to compare what’s been written with the reality on the ground, you’ll be mauled as a “stalker” and “slimer” and “wingnut Nazi whore.” Never mind the truly unhinged and destructive tactics that the anti-war, anti-Bush Left itself has embraced and perfected.

Context, people, context: This is the inevitable M.O. every time bloggers and commentators on the right have challenged the Absolute Moral Authority of the Democrat poster child du jour. It happened with Cindy Sheehan. And the military recruiter-bashing thugs at Santa Cruz. And MoveOn.org. And the phony soldier saga. Crush Rush is just the tip of the iceberg. Just ask the mom-and-pop Cafe Press owners who got those cease-and-desist letters from MoveOn.org’s lawyers for daring to defend Gen. David Petraeus.

When they cry “intimidation,” they are engaging in classic projection.

This is not about The Children. It’s about the purported adults in the Democrat party leadership, the left-wing blogosphere, and the sycophantic media who can’t debate policy without flinging their peas when challenged.

Financial assets are at the very core of this debate. Schip was supposed to be a bridge to help insure children in poor families who barely missed out on qualifying for Medicaid. The Democrats are pushing the Schip eligibility level to 200, 300, 400 percent of the federal poverty line. The kids’ program is no longer just for kids and may well cover illegal aliens to boot.

Instead of sitting on the sidelines, Republicans need to force the Left out of its ideological infancy and stop this disastrous entitlement juggernaut.

I repeat what I told the Times reporter:

If Republicans don’t have the guts to hold the line, they deserve to lose their seats.

***

Reminder: The veto override vote is scheduled for Oct. 18. The stakes are high…

Sensing their best opportunity yet to overrule a White House that has stymied them on stem cell research and Iraq, congressional Democrats and their supporters have launched a campaign to override President Bush’s veto of plans to expand the popular State Children’s Health Insurance Program.

With polls showing broad support even among Republican voters to expand coverage to 4 million more children nationwide, congressional Democrats are rallying their allies publicly while speaking to their GOP colleagues privately. Supporters both on and off Capitol Hill are sinking millions of dollars into advertisements and automated “robo-calls” in the home districts of targeted Republicans, urging constituents to add to the pressure.

The veto override campaign pits a congressional majority - eager for victory on a program popular among both liberals and moderates - against conservative Republicans whose base sees the expansion as a step toward a national health plan. With the vote scheduled for Oct. 18, Democrats have given themselves two weeks to build support for a vote with reverberations likely to be felt next fall…

…The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which raises money for the House races, is targeting eight Republicans with radio and television ads. Democrats were joined yesterday by a coalition including MoveOn.org, Americans United for Change and several labor unions, which announced spots that officials said would have an impact on more than 30 Republicans.

Make sure House Minority Leader John Boehner hears from you:

Washington Office:
1011 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-3508
Phone: (202) 225-6205
Fax: (202) 225-0704

Posted in: Health care, Nutroots, Kos

7,698 posted on 10/10/2007 3:43:56 AM PDT by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Frost Family Draws Ire of Conservatives ( MSM Fights Back! Free Republic mentioned)--Ann Coulter is proven right again ...... liberals don't feel you're allowed to respond to their lies if those lies are spoken/published by a victim, or someone in the victim's family.
 
The Democrats' Unhealthy Poster Child Abuse(Free Republic is mentioned)
 
Rush Limbaugh, Vindicated --the other day  this guy walked up to the counter and said, (in front of other customers standing there) "I wish Rush would die of a drug overdose".
 
Hillary: Fake Hawk
 
Attacking Talk Radio--As a child in the 1950s my mother told me that communists lie, intimidate, twist vocabulary, warp the law to achieve their desired end. They define people as subhuman if they disagree with them. Then it is no disgrace to dispatch subhumans. All of these things now apply to Democrats. Taxes are “contributions.” We have “dues” we owe to the United Nations, a communist dominated organization. The boldness with which the Marxists pursue their agenda today is frightening.

Anti-Tobacco Crusaders Boldly Go into Smokers' Homes.
 
 Women’s Studies Dept's Ignore the Plight of Women in Islam
 
 The Giles manifesto
 
Exposing the Real Che Guevara: BOOK
 
A Prayer for Archimedes
 
Sex, drugs and my 15-year-old; A Sex Talk By An Aging Hipster
 
FBI probes Torricelli for alleged lobbying gains (Medicaid ripoff with offshore latino pols)
 
Sweet Reason (pols' sucking-up to illegals a very dirty political game)
 
REAL ID endorsed to solve problem with illegals--close our borders first.......and then see if its needed...
 
The Politics of Disaster--We've been warning of the financial disaster looming off the Florida coast ever since Governor Charlie Crist socialized the state's hurricane insurance market and put Florida taxpayers on the hook for billions. The plan will work splendidly as long as there are no hurricanes...

7,699 posted on 10/10/2007 5:30:50 AM PDT by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Well, THEG is about "Frost'd" out- but one more entry:
 
 
http://commonsensepoliticalthought.com/?p=2015
 

What Is Wrong with Them?

October 10th, 2007 by Sharon

The nutroots are out in full force defending Democrats using a child to do a liberal’s work. To listen to them, questioning the sob story of 12-year-old Graeme Frost, who was shilling for the Dems latest project: ballooning the SCHIP program to include upper middle class families.

Why would conservatives be so skeptical of Dems’ newest poster child? Gee, I dunno. Maybe it’s because liberals love using their kids to promote their causes, even if the kid would be against the parent’s political position.

What is bizarre to me about this whole brouhaha is the faux outrage of the left that their tactics are being attacked. Let’s make this clear: it’s not really whether or not Frost’s family could afford insurance. It’s that Democrats can’t make the case for raising the costs to cover families making $83,000 per year. They know that, which is why they bring in Frost to tell why SCHIP helped his family.

For the record, President Bush wanted to extend SCHIP, but didn’t want the $35 billion price tag Democrats have attached to it. Democrats want universal health care, and insuring children is a backdoor approach to it. Besides, who can oppose insuring children?

Amusingly, moonbats are defending the life choices of the Frosts by saying they’re “doing what Republicans espouse.” Well, excuse me, but as Dan Riehl points out, that’s a load of hooey.

Yes, the Frost children are victims, but not of conservatives. They look more like victims of a couple of mostly spoiled brats who became parents and never felt compelled to take responsibility for themselves when it came to the bottom line on that. There are poor people in America who need help, particularly as regards Health care. The point is, the family above shouldn’t be and simply aren’t among them. Call Dad next time you want some bucks FH. And kindly leave the rest of America’s collective wallet the hell alone.

Or, hey, get a second job with benefits. I’ve done that more than once in my life when I needed the cash. And do it before you let Graeme tell the media how much you struggle to take care of him, because there are enough people in America who really do struggle with these issues. And when they take a look at your lot in life they are left far from impressed and unmoved to cough up one thin dime so you can enjoy afternoons playing with your lathe, or whatever the hell else it is you do in your factory.

I don’t see someone who needs my help in F Halsey Frost. I see a simpleton and a loser who had more kids than he could afford and doesn’t appear to have given up very much in life to deal with that situation. Who knows, maybe Dad figured it out, too and cut him off. What the hell, there’s always welfare, right?

The problem with the liberal world view is that none of us should be required to live with the decisions we make. As Dan says, responsible parents figure out how to pay for their own children, and only after they’ve exhausted their own resources do they consider government assistance. Though my husband is uninsurable, my children and I do have insurance and it costs about $300 per month.

What’s terrible is that the Frosts really do symbolize the Democrats’ idea of the poor: people who volunteer to make less money than it takes to support their family, then expect the taxpayers to make up the difference. That’s an insult to the families who really are poor. But I guess a really poor child wouldn’t look as sympathetic to Dems as this family did.

Michelle Malkin has a great post that gives more details about what is wrong with the “they’re attacking children” harangue from the left.

To start with, the Maryland program does not assets-test, meaning that people who own property but don’t necessarily make a great deal are eligible for the taxpayer-supported program. That’s how the Frosts managed not to provide for their children. The plan the Democrats in Congress are proposing is designed to expand what should be a program to help those who cannot afford health insurance to include those who don’t want to afford their own insurance.

And more on Frost.

The Frosts own a home in Baltimore purchased for $55,000 sixteen years ago–and now worth an estimated $300,000. That’s a lot of equity. In addition, the children’s father, Halsey Frost, owns commercial real estate and his own small business, but chose not to buy health insurance for himself and his wife, whom he hired as an employee. She now apparently works freelance at a medical publishing firm, which also reportedly doesn’t offer insurance. Gemma and Graeme both attend expensive private schools; the Frosts have two other school-age children. Reid’s staff says Gemma and Graeme receive tuition breaks. But it’s not clear when those scholarships were instituted and/or whether the other two receive tuition aid as well. Moreover, Frost’s family comes from considerable means. The children’s maternal grandfather was an engineering executive. Their paternal grandparents hail from affluent Bronxville, New York, where the grandfather is a prominent facilities management consultant and chairman of the municipal planning board.

In other words: The public trough is not Halsey Frost’s last and only resort.

Having your children hurt in an accident is a tragedy. Exploiting that tragedy for political gain is despicable.

Cross-posted at Gold-Plated Witch on Wheels.


7,700 posted on 10/10/2007 6:09:00 AM PDT by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 7,661-7,6807,681-7,7007,701-7,720 ... 12,501-12,502 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson