Did the President invade and attack Iraq and I slept through it?
I hear so many people saying that it's wrong to attack without presenting the evidence first. Well, since we haven't started shooting yet, where's the problem?
IF we start bombing or marching on Baghdad tonight, then I can understand where some people might have a legitimate gripe (though I personally disagree with them). But I have observed our President for over two years now. He does the right thing at the right time. I have full confidence that by the time a battle is waged there will be more than enough convincing evidence to support such action and only those nimwits who would be critical if he said that the sky is blue would still be objecting.
In the meantime, why "blame" him for something he hasn't done yet???
Btw, that is a rhetorical question. I know the answer already.