To: nicollo
I was listening to Glenn Beck this morning and he was asking, "Can you imagine if one month before 9/11 the president had given a speech and said that we are going into Afghanistan to take out the Taliban and Osama? There would be no support and there would be an outcry that they have done nothing to us." Just weeks later, there was a different kind of outcry: "What did you know and when did you know it? Why didn't you do anything about it?"
Whatever evidence President Bush has must be taken seriously, especially by the DNC. They've already tried the "what did you know and when did you know it?" routine. If we fail to stop an AQ attack that is aided in anyway by Iraq, what are they going to say?
238 posted on
01/29/2003 10:19:59 AM PST by
Mr. Mulliner
(There is such a thing as going too far, and you have gone it.)
To: Mr. Mulliner
Whatever evidence President Bush has must be taken seriously, especially by the DNC. They've already tried the "what did you know and when did you know it?" routine. If we fail to stop an AQ attack that is aided in anyway by Iraq, what are they going to say?
Yes, but don't get caught in the lie. You might say, "Whatever
additional evidence President Bush has..."
We've already got the evidence: Iraq has violated its agreements.
250 posted on
01/29/2003 10:53:40 AM PST by
nicollo
(And yes, I am pissed off.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson