[gore3000]

If all the dots are subject to revision, it seems to me that the dots prove nothing at all! -me-

Wrong, idiot. The dots aren't subject to revision, the context is.

The fact that you find it necessary to insult me because you put your foot in your mouth and admitted that the bones do not prove anything since they are always subject to revision shows the truth of my statement above. Therefore paleontology is no proof of evolution as I have detailed in other posts.

[balrog666]

The fact that you find it necessary to insult me because you put your foot in your mouth and admitted that the bones do not prove anything since they are always subject to revision shows the truth of my statement above. Therefore paleontology is no proof of evolution as I have detailed in other posts.

Boy, you really are stupid. How anybody outside of a mental institution could read my posts and glean those ideas is truly incredible!

Oh, and objecting to my characterization of you is really funny, Mr. Slime, Mr everybody's-a-liar, Mr evo-Taliban, Mr doesn't-understand-a-"proof".

[Condorman]

...Therefore paleontology is no proof of evolution as I have detailed in other posts.

Balrog, you careless fool! With that dreadful lapse--an anonymous post on a small website--you have singlehandedly destroyed the foundations and findings of 150 years of research. The Atheist Council for Evolutionary Science is going to revoke your membership for this!

[snif] How could you...?