Not really. As long as a theory is testable and falsifiable it has a shot. What have you got?
Originally the word liberal meant social conservatives(no govt religion--none) who advocated growth and progress---mostly technological(knowledge being absolute/unchanging)based on law--reality... UNDER GOD---the nature of GOD/man/govt. does not change. These were the Classical liberals...founding fathers-PRINCIPLES---stable/SANE scientific reality/society---industrial progress...moral/social character-values(private/personal) GROWTH(limited NON-intrusive PC Govt/religion---schools)!
Evolution...Atheism-dehumanism---TYRANNY(pc-religion/rhetoric)...
Then came the SPLIT SCHIZOPHRENIA/ZOMBIE/BRAVE-NWO1984 LIBERAL NEO-Soviet Darwin America---the post-modern age
Then came the SPLIT SCHIZOPHRENIA/ZOMBIE/BRAVE-NWO1984 LIBERAL NEO-Soviet Darwin America---the post-modern age of switch-flip-spin-DEFORMITY-cancer...Atheist secular materialists through ATHEISM/evolution CHANGED-REMOVED the foundations...demolished the wall(separation of state/religion)--trampled the TRUTH-GOD...built a satanic temple/SWAMP-MALARIA/RELIGION(cult of darwin-marx-satan) over them---made/REDACTED these absolutes subordinate--relative--'non-existant' and calling/CHANGING all the... residuals---technology/science === TO evolution via schlock/sMUCK IDEOLOGY/lies/bias...to substantiate/justify their efforts--claims...social engineering--PC--atheism...anti-God/Truth RELIGION(USSC monopoly)--and declared a crusade/WAR--JIHAD--INTOLERANCE/TYRANNY(breaking the establishment clause)...against God--man--society/SCIENCE!!
You think science/Creation is compatable to a materialistc cult/lie/heresy?
45% creationists/science(sane/normal)...
45% creation and evolutioned(confused/schizoids)...
10% hard core atheists/materialists---EVOLUTION only whacks!
That bones alone don't make a relationship. What happened to the mesonychus characteristics of the Pakicetus? How do you explain the whale-hippo closeness with in this diagram? How does the ambolucetus come from the Pakicetus if this is the diagram of the relationship?
Note this image comes from Nature and is produced by Thewissen. --- source of the above image.
The truth. That is why the evolutionists do not wish to discuss the science of evolution and instead keep repeating the mantra that evolution is science. If you cannot defend your theory scientifically, it is not science.