[AndrewC]

Not really. As long as a theory is testable and falsifiable it has a shot. What have you got?

That bones alone don't make a relationship. What happened to the mesonychus characteristics of the Pakicetus? How do you explain the whale-hippo closeness with in this diagram? How does the ambolucetus come from the Pakicetus if this is the diagram of the relationship?

Note this image comes from Nature and is produced by Thewissen. --- source of the above image.

[Junior]

I never said bones alone make a relationship; indeed, bones are simply another clue to the relationships between organisms.

[AndrewC]

Dyslexic today.

with in=within

ambolucetus=(some creature developed for Darwininian pleasure) or ambulocetus -- take your choice