Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sandude
But YOU have no proof that Ricci made any voluntary admission of guilt.

The case stinks and you know it!

737 posted on 09/30/2002 11:00:47 PM PDT by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies ]


To: lakey
The case stinks and you know it!

I have based my speculation around Richard Ricci because that is who the police named as the most likely suspect. Not me, or Jolly, or Sherlock, or Devil, but Law Enforcement made this determination. When I look at all of the information that we have on Richard I can understand why he was of interest to LE in this case. If the day comes that LE names another potential suspect then I will examine the issues surrounding that individual. What separates us is that I trust that LE is doing their job. There have been errors for sure but nothing on the level of negligence that you and others foster. If the family is involved I think it would have come out by now. I could be wrong but I’m not ready to support any wild eyed theories that have absolutely no basis in fact. In our society there is supposed to be a presumption of innocence. Many on this thread forget this principle. It is alright to speculate about whatever as long as it has some kind of foundation in reality. The speculator should also be prepared to answer reasoned challenges. Too many times it seems more like mad dogs going after a piece of meat whenever anybody has some "dirt" on the Smart family.

748 posted on 09/30/2002 11:29:13 PM PDT by sandude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson